So because I disagree with your agenda I am a man of privilege even when you do not know a single thing about me. How very typical.
How about you come off that high horse of moral ambiguity and contribute something meaningful instead of spouting that same old drivel about how people are privileged if they do not share the same viewpoint.
Then maybe we could have a civil discussion
Saying that your comments come from a position of privilege was not intended to be uncivil. It was an observation.
You make a good point. I know nothing about you. You then go on to tell me I have an agenda and then state the reason I believe you are privileged is because we have differing views - how ironic.
Looking at the state of this thread the last place for a civil discussion on race is this forum.
“Same old drivel”, “moral ambiguity”, “high horse” - all very progressive terms in a discussion.
Just to clear things up, I sit somewhere in the middle on this issue.
Does Gary Neville going on a rant trigger racists to be racist? I highly doubt it but the way people are falling over themselves to ignore the way Pogba has been treated by 'pundits' in certain cases is disturbing. Saying that his treatment has something to do with his race does not mean people believe the likes of Neville wear white hooded cloaks in their spare time. People do not operate in silos, Pogba represents a part of society that a lot of people are uncomfortable with and ignorant of.
Pogba's performances for United are often bad enough that the analysis doesn't need any bolstering with criticism of his attitude in the dressing room etc. and any stories are always littered with vague cliche terms. If pundits like Neville actually gave concrete stories instead of 'i hear', 'they're saying' etc. then fine but to go on regular impassioned tirades and stand back doesn't seem ok to me. That doesn't mean he is attempting to incite racists btw but the whole media machine at Sky crave interactions on their social media platforms and they'd be naive to believe a number of their followers don't have unsavory motives.
You can dislike Paul Pogba and not be racist. You can report in a negative manner on Paul Pogba and not be racist. Yet you begin your discussion by ruling out the possibility that Pogba's race may have a part in the way he is discussed by pundits - so I don't see another way to class your post.
I could go on but it will get lost in the wave of arguments already going on.
BTW, calling somebody privileged doesn't mean I'm calling you a racist. As i said, things are so black and white on here there is no nuance for conversations to breath and expand, meaning points are often misconstrued or poorly worded [something I can be at fault of - A LOT].