Red Dreams
Full Member
I will blame the usual suspects.
scousers.
scousers.
This is probably going to be my last post since I keep repeating myself. NOBODY IS BLAMING GARY NEVILLE FOR TWITTER TROLLS. Gary Neville was hysterical and his criticism was unneeded. That's my point. It's not that ANYTHING he says can trigger an increase in negativity it's specifically the vitriol that came out of his mouth yesterday. It wasn't a nuanced measured opinion, it was the equivalent of a hit piece and that is where I'm drawing the distinction. It's really simple stuff you are trying to morph into something else.That’s completely ridiculous. Gary Neville has had fits about everything. If you watched Gary’s rant last night and in your head thought “ooh this might spark some racists off” then I don’t know what’s up with you. He criticised Pogba. He didn’t racially abuse him. People who abused Pogba need to be held accountable they don’t have any excuse. It’s not Gary’s fault at all. How they’ve even been linked is beyond me. Give it a rest with all the “Potential Trigger” bollocks aswell. Wrong is wrong.
Society in general will always need a scapegoat.
Gary Neville might as well be a Scouser at this point. Carragher has a more measured opinion about us these days.I will blame the usual suspects.
scousers.
This is probably going to be my last post since I keep repeating myself. NOBODY IS BLAMING GARY NEVILLE FOR TWITTER TROLLS. Gary Neville was hysterical and his criticism was unneeded. That's my point. It's not that ANYTHING he says can trigger an increase in negativity it's specifically the vitriol that came out of his mouth yesterday. It wasn't a nuanced measured opinion, it was the equivalent of a hit piece and that is where I'm drawing the distinction. It's really simple stuff you are trying to morph into something else.
This is on Gary Neville. He set off a viscous precedent right after the game when emotions were high. Ultimately he didn’t control his emotions. Anyone that watched the game realized he had a really good game. The racism is just disgusting
NOBODY = ISigh.
Haven’t bothered to read the discussion in here yet. The way I see it is racism has no place to begin with and there are racist feckers without Gary going bonkers. This sharp increase in abuse towards Pogba is very misguided especially when he’s come off the back of 2 very good games for us and having pushed off a media shitstorm about leaving us. Gary added fuel to the fire. He should have been more composed to realize that.Sigh.
This will never stop unfortunately, as long as different skin complexions exist people will always use it to attack others; even if they aren't necessarily true racists. Real shame!!
I will blame the usual suspects.
scousers.
Gary Neville might as well be a Scouser at this point. Carragher has a more measured opinion about us these days.
I'm half expecting one of these days for Gary Neville to rip his face off live on air and it be exposed that it's actually Graeme Souness underneath.
That's just them wanting to live in their ignorance and shut out expanding their horizons. Why should it be stopped at just surface level?You’re essentially calling good-minded people racists though, that’s the issue. Even if it’s not directly what you’re suggesting, it’s the implication, that’s why people dig their heels in. This is when you start to lose people in the discussion because you’re picking fights with people that are on your side. Ultimately you end up having people who would fight your corner not wanting to get involved.
Great postThere's a really interesting thing that happens in discussions, I think, where people become exasperated at each other because they are talking at crossed purposes.
When I talk about racism what I mean is the myriad factors that mean that the entire society I live in is based on white supremacist principles. It's the small decisions, organisational and institutional norms; the traditions, practices and principles that bake inequality into almost every facet of social, cultural and political life. In this sense I really mean structural racism - the kind of racism that everyone can (and often will) contribute to without necessarily holding any explicit prejudice in their beliefs. The kind of racism you can contribute to by simply not recognising it exists (and, if you're white, that you benefit from it at the expense of others).
When other people talk about racism they have a much more reductionist view of it. They define it simply as "hating someone because of the colour of their skin" or "acting in a way that is consciously discriminatory due to someone's race." Now, ignoring the argument over which definition is preferable or "right" (because it's the one I use. Everything I think is right. Always). This means that when two people with those two understandings of the word speak to each other they can end up becoming very quickly exasperated with each other because they can't understand where the other one is starting.
Take this thread. There are those that will see Gary Neville's comments as being based in the structural racism that demands different expectations from players of colour, or players from overseas, or players from a religious minority, and want to discuss that issue and unpack the norms that create that situation. Others will read that as an accusation that Neville holds some malicious feeling towards minorities. Crossed wires. Inevitable disagreement.
A good example of this is to ask the question "Is it possible for a white person to experience racism in the UK today?" To me, the answer is obviously no. A white person cannot experience the reality of existing within a society where they are consistently and systematically disadvantaged by their race. They might experience similar discrimination due to class, gender, sexuality, age etc. (intersectionality is complex, y'all!) but the specific experience of structural racism is owned and defined by racial minority groups that suffer due to it. Other people would think of an example where a white person might be discriminated against or even attacked because of their race in the UK and would claim that of course this means that person has experienced racism. They would find my assertion that it's impossible for a white person to experience racism to be basically bizarre and ludicrous. We'd talk at crossed purposes and both end up thinking the other one super weird.
Anyway. Just a thought.
There was no need for Neville to lose his rag - it was truly pathetic - but Sky seems to like his style. Normally I turn to the fan cams but this time I saw the entire rant. Yeah, ok it was a stupid on the pitch moment between two of our players but the number of times Neville screwed up when he played would bury the pair of them in crap. His holier than thou opinions and his self-proclaimed status as the voice of all things United have gone past their sell by date. Sky should replace him - Danny H seems altogether more capable and less shrew-like.
Initially, Gary was under the impression that Rashford was the designated penalty taker (since he took it last week) and Pogba took it off him and missed. Then, he himself realized that in the last matchweek there was a discussion between Pogba and Rashford for the penalty as well. So, he was really just annoyed we didn't have a designated penalty taker and it can cost us points, and deciding or discussing who takes the penalty on the spot is not professional/doesn't look good.
It's worth a watch if you want a laugh.
I think it's worth pointing out that neither Gary or anyone else on the panel made any reference to the colour of Pogba's skin.
NOBODY = I
Figure of speech and all that and that was posted after I said that so yeah...
Haven’t bothered to read the discussion in here yet. The way I see it is racism has no place to begin with and there are racist feckers without Gary going bonkers. This sharp increase in abuse towards Pogba is very misguided especially when he’s come off the back of 2 very good games for us and having pushed off a media shitstorm about leaving us. Gary added fuel to the fire. He should have been more composed to realize that.
Gary has a higher level of responsibility than any twitter troll because of the reach and influence he has over the public say.
He has the capability of really hurting our club and players because of the position he is in. Immediately after a game when emotions are rampant was a horrible decision on Gary’s end.
The racism and Gary’s escalation of the current abuse can be mutually exclusive and I think it’s odd there’s a back and forth discussion in here about that. Seems like some are saying that they are mutually exclusive and some non-mutually exclusive but can’t deny Gary’s horrible actions regardless.
twitter and caf logic.So unless I'm completely missing the point I don't see how Neville said anything wrong. People can't listen to this and somehow link it to some s.... racially abusing Pogba.
It would be quite sad if idiots on social media have such a strong influence that pundits need to change their analysis and critisism.Okay so my thoughts on the Gary Neville rant.
In the backdrop of the Tammy Abraham racial abuse for missing a penalty he should have known that his attack on Pogba for doing the same thing could have the same result with people racially abusing Paul for missing a penalty. It hadn't been a week had he forgot that another black player had been racially abused for missing a pen? Of course not, so going over the top about a black player missing a pen might not be the best thing to do?
I'm not saying that he meant for fans to racially abuse Paul just that in the climate of the racial abuse over the last week be more circumspect about what you say or more importantly the tone in which you say it.
It's hilarious you would point to a post made after mine, which proves feck all. It's also telling you ignore that most of the posts critiquing Neville point out that he didn't help. But yeah let's cherry pick pick posts to have an imaginary argument...It's been said all throughout the thread especially towards the beginning, you just haven't looked hard enough. It's hilarious you make that post and literally the very next post is an example of what you state isn't happening.
Due to Red Nev’s dog whistling.
It's hilarious you would point to a post made after mine, which proves feck all. It's also telling you ignore that most of the posts critiquing Neville point out that he didn't help. But yeah let's cherry pick pick posts to have an imaginary argument...
Why can’t we accept there’s two issues here?It's bollocks. Blaming Gary Neville is very frustrating and upsetting for me to look at, because rather than accepting that there's an issue that needs addressing, we'll link it to him and blame him instead of the root problem.
It's almost burying heads in the sand.
I agree there's two issues actually, but I think the issue at hand is racism in football which doesn't include Gary Nevilles rant.Why can’t we accept there’s two issues here?
You are literally cherry picking posts to have an imaginary argument. Nice of you to ignore all of these on the first page. Don't be purposely dense. MOST (since semantics matter to you so much) people aren't blaming Neville. They are, rightly, calling him out for his childish, unnecessary, agenda-filled comments that only increased the negativity around Pogba.That's one of the very first posts, well before your post. And that's skipping a couple that don't outright blame Neville.
Neville's massive over reaction to a penalty miss didn't help. He singled out Pogba and made it out to be all his fault that we dropped points. He took a penalty and missed. It happens.
Neville's bullshit doesn't help with this stuff, the stupid prick.
Yeah, he is leader of hate speech when it comes to Pogba. He has agenda against Pogba from long time and can't wait something to happen so that he can spout more nonsense.
Neville created an atmosphere by talking as if Pogba committed a crime. He won't be the last person who misses a penalty in life. Give the goalkeeper some credit having guessed the right way and made a good save. Football is about small margins.
Relax, Gary! Racists do one!
Neville and Sky with their constant need to dramatize everything doesn't help. Not saying they shouldn't ever criticize anyone but feck sake relax, it was just a missed penalty and a decently struck one at that.
Other journalists are jumping on the drama bandwagon this morning as well, it's just what comes with Manchester United.
The stupidest people shout the loudest on twitter unfortunately
You thought that the tone of his criticism was professional?It would be quite sad if idiots on social media have such a strong influence that pundits need to change their analysis and critisism.
You are literally cherry picking posts to have an imaginary argument. Nice of you to ignore all of these on the first page. Don't be purposely dense. MOST (since semantics matter to you so much) people aren't blaming Neville. They are, rightly, calling him out for his childish, unnecessary, agenda-filled comments that only increased the negativity around Pogba.
Patricio is the real culprit here, he saved the penalty after all.I blame it all on Wolves. After the Abraham incident, they should have known that saving a penalty from a black player was just going to attract racist comments against that player. If Gary Neville should stop doing his job properly just because it might incite racists to be racist, then so should Rui Patricio.
Only a truly dense person take the word NOBODY literally. Notice it's just you because NOBODY is that dense. Jog on.You literally said "Nobody is blaming Gary Neville for Twitter trolls," this was followed by a post blaming Gary Neville for Twitter trolls. You then said that was made after your post so I've gotten one from the very first page where someone has blamed Gary a Neville for Twitter trolls. That's not me cherry picking, it's literally you ignoring what people have said to suit your agenda. You were wrong get over it.
Cool, good chat.Only a truly dense person take the word NOBODY literally. Notice it's just you because NOBODY is that dense. Jog on.
Neville said and did nothing wrong. Obviously.
Some turds on the other side of the planet spamming racial abuse on generic twitter accounts has feck all to do with what Neville said. But even if it did have, what then? Are pundits supposed to avoid talking about black players now in fear of what they say being linked to some russian bots twitter spam? Give over.
People really need to get a grip about twitter and the internet and the reality of things. No one tweeting racial abuse at Pogba are actual United fans coming out the other side of watching MNF feeling fully justified to unleash their racist views on Pogba's twitter feed, all because Neville said he was a twat for taking a penalty he had no business taking.
OkCool, good chat.
Ffs have you actually read the thread, people aren’t accusing him of being racist, they’re accusing him of contributing to an atmosphere where racists feel liberated to attack Pogba. Neville’s personal attacks, throwing around words such as treachery, have added to the growing target on Pogba’s back, similar to the target that was placed in Raheem Sterling’s back resulting in the abuse he received last season, a situation that Neville himself acknowledged was aggravated by the witch-hunt in the media. Neville isn’t stupid, he knows that his words hold weight, all people are saying is that he should exercise use more caution when discussing Pogba and hold back on the personal attacks. Shouldn’t be too much to ask.
Precisely. People are ignoring the issue at hand and using Neville as a scapegoat.It 100% would have happened without Neville saying anything. It’s the third time it’s happened in a week. Half of the accounts won’t even be football fans, they’ll be 8chan trolls buzzing off the power it’s giving them in the media with all the coverage.
It's entirely irrelevant to this discussion. If his punditry is poor this should be talked about in the Gary Neville thread. It's just silly to form some hypothetical connection between the two issues. The twitter reaction would be the same if Neville's criticism on Pogba would actually be valid and should pundits really adjust their criticism because idiots on twitter might react like this?You thought that the tone of his criticism was professional?