If anything is a hyperbole it's this post. Pogba's lapse of concencration cost us the first goal which then set the tone, which makes the 'negative tactics - Pogba shit, positive tactics - Pogba good' even funnier. As
@kundalini said before: he costs us goals too often. And today's game is in line with the criticism he's been getting for the last three seasons here: he's doing brilliant stuff just to make a schoolboy error that makes him look like an idiot. Problem is, it's the third season running of this shit, meaning he's learnt very little in that time if anything.
And no, I'm not deluded enough to think that Rüdiger was supposed to be picked up by Lindelöf on this particular corner, as contrary to every other set piece there was in this game. It was not a discussion either, it was Pogba throwing a hissy fit at Lindelöf. Not sure how you arrived at the conclusion about the 'usually 2-3 man marking' when even in this screenshot you've got 5 people man marking with Lukaku being on the front post. There was nothing NBA about the screenplay, Jesus, Luiz was hardly even active there, it was Pogba who let Rüdiger off there with a free header, nothing particulary special about Chelsea's routine nor anything to give them credit for. It was a good healer only because there was nobody near Rüdiger.
I'll be the first one to jump on Souness' back for constant criticism of Pogba, but with plays like this one or the one against Wolves, he's giving idiots like Souness bullets to fire and a reason for other people to question him. And with him being fine with Raiola running his whore mouth about our club, there'll always be question marks over his head as to whether he's really worth all the hassle.