Anytime I think the board aren't complete idiots - just very slow to action - I get that nagging feeling that I'm just wrong. Good examples include letting LVG sell Rafael, Hernandez and Nani leave for peanuts, and of course the Fellaini 4m.
But choosing Jose over Pogba would be their new crowning achievement. One of them is approaching his prime, just won the premier footballing competition in the world, is marketable and cost us almost 100m. The other is toxic, won't have won a major trophy for 4 years and could only be marketable if a gofundme was started to remove him.
Purely from a business perspective, the board should be protecting the more impactful (in a good way) asset.
Reading the papers and listening to the British pundits, we also start getting into seriously dodgy racial territory imo. Pogba isn't 'disciplined', or 'intelligent', or lacks 'tactical understanding'. Unlike that nice white fella next to him, who is so good at tactics that he's been a defensive midfielder as we concede 2 goals per match, and hurts us anytime we meander into the opponent's half.
If Pogba leaves United, he will be awesome, for at least another 4/5 years. If Jose leaves United, he'll be out of football until the next time the Portugal team falters.
Discipline within a squad is based on the premise that the manager is in charge, that he picks the team and decides upon the tactics. That has always been the case, and most likely always will be. The moment there is any suggestion that a player is more important than the manager, or that a player is somehow entitled to sulk and down tools if he doesn't like what he's being asked to do for the team, that discipline is destroyed and results will reflect that.
The information emanating from Old Trafford regarding the relationship between Mourinho and Pogba is, at best, sketchy. However the evidence based on selections and performances is that Mourinho no longer trusts Pogba to carry out his duties on the pitch, and it has been Pogba's performances which have led to that situation. Arguing that it is Mourinho's fault for adopting the wrong tactics, or picking the wrong players to work alongside Pogba, just ignores the fundamental point that selection and tactics are the manager's prerogative, and the manager (and the fans, and the other players in the team) have every right to expect maximum effort and commitment from everyone in the side. Any other arrangement would be anarchy (what happens if Mourinho is sacked, and Pogba takes issue with the next manager's set up? ... do we keep shedding managers just to keep him happy?).
When Mourinho signed Pogba, I'm sure he had a vision of how he would fit into the side, and I imagine that would have been shared with Pogba in the course of the negotiations leading up to his signature. To argue that Mourinho knew what he was getting, and should therefore be adapting his tactics to suit Pogba seems to me to ignore the point that Pogba too would have known what was going to be expected of him, and presumably thought his game was up to it.
I'm no fan of Mourinho, and would be delighted if he was replaced in short order (there are aspects of his behaviour I find intolerable, and I think he may be using tactics that are past their sell-by date). Nevertheless that does not give any of the players the right to metaphorically down tools. If it comes to a clash of heads between a player and the manager there should only ever be one winner.
I believe Pogba will be sold, probably to a club in one of the southern European leagues, and I believe he is likely to prosper. That does not mean that it would be wrong to sell him as I seriously doubt he will ever prosper at our club, or even in our league.
The 'racial' comment is seriously wide of the mark. There are many people posting on here who don't think much of Pogba's performances but are enthusiastic about the contributions of players like Rashford, or would like to see Fred get more game time. Is your 'nice white fella' Matic? If so, he gets even more stick than Pogba on here.