In Rainbows
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2014
- Messages
- 6,940
There is no evidence that we're better without him and there is no evidence we would be better without him. The whole unit being better than the sum of their parts starts and ends with Mourinho.There's something called the whole unit being bigger than the sums of their part. You can have a midfielder with double figures but everyone else struggling thanks to him being a passenger off the ball, and you can have a midfield that looks average on paper but thanks to them doing a proper midfield job and supporting them with a good attacking unit, the team ranks more results than the first one with loads of goals and assists. Funny enough, we used to be like that with SAF and you can look at how Liverpool improved after selling Coutinho even though their team now lacks a creator midfield, they look better, more balanced, and bigger than the sum of their players.
Pogba is a midfielder. I want to see a proper midfielder job, that's all.
What do Pogba's midfield partners excel at btw? I keep seeing the finger pointed at Pogba as if he's what's wrong with our midfield and I want evidence that shows he's what's wrong. This is the minimum that needs to be presented in the argument for wanting to get rid of him.
I don't particularly need Pogba to be this high energy guy btw. As long as the midfield can balance each other out to provide everything I'm satisfied with that midfield. For example, Kante is not good at distributing the ball and he can't attack all that well. But he does specialize in destroying opposition attacks. When Pogba is next to him, he hides Pogba's deficiency and Pogba hides his deficiencies. There are different ways of accomplishing this. We currently have Pogba. Why not try and target other midfielders who can better fulfill what the United midfield lacks? If United lack energy in midfield let's target someone who provides that. Do we lack someone to break up attacks much better than Matic? Let's target that player. Not everyone needs to be Roy Keane and not everyone needs to be Scholes.
I feel like you guys are being too rigid in what a midfielder needs to be as opposed to looking at the midfield as a whole and how it functions as a unit. Juve had the best midfield in the world with Pogba in it. Why didn't Juve need Pogba to be what you guys rigidly want a midfielder to be? Because they understood the group's production is what matters.
Last edited: