Bobcat
Full Member
Not a 'good player', a 'record transfer' player.
Unless you already have Ronaldo or Messi in your team (which makes every player signed inferior, regardless of cost) you'd be expecting a record transfer player who isn't dependent on equally talented teammates in order to properly shine.
Ronaldo went to Madrid and was immediately their driving force. He was better than everyone at the club (by a distance) but that didn't stop him playing a huge role in improving the team's fortunes.
If Madrid had paid all that money, and then realised that Ronaldo wouldn't shine until he had two more Ronaldo's and a Messi playing with him... that would have been cause for concern.
I don't think it's as simple as that, and it's more of a two way street.
Kagawa for example was a player that was lauded for his ability to "improve those around him" and if you watched him at Dortmund before he came here, it seemed a reasonable assessment. He never settled here though, and i suspect the main culprit was that our system did not fit him as well as it did at Dortmund. Carrick is in the same category, as in not a "highlight reel player", but does a lot to improve those around him.
Pogba on the other hand is a different breed of player (like Ronaldo), who will often show up with a match winning piece of skill, but not necessarily elevate the players around him like Carrick does. That does not mean the Pogbas and Ronaldos of football does not improve their team (they certainly do) but they do in a different way than the Carricks and Kagawas.
Seeing as Pogba is a CM, he won't have the same visible impact as an attacking player, but that does not mean hes not worth it either. You have to keep in mind he is still only 23 years old, time is on his side and i'm confident he will get better and more consistent with time