BringNaniBack
Leaves a bullshit trail behind him
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2014
- Messages
- 3,530
Poor display today but he's been good for us, overall. If we could just finish our chances he sets up.
He set up nothing.
Poor display today but he's been good for us, overall. If we could just finish our chances he sets up.
He wasn't Juventus' main man. He's wasn't even their main midfielder. He shared the load - which is the point.
At United, he's expected to actually be the main man (with Zlatan) and he doesn't have it in him.
There's nothing wrong with that. Lots of very good players aren't able to be main men. Di Maria, for example. Ozil as well.
But until Pogba isn't the main man/star player, United wont be a top team.
He wasn't the main man at Juve. The post that we are discussing says that no top club should have him as their main man. I'm not sure about the latter as he is still young and could develop further as a player. My worry is about his decision making. It's not top class.
Does it? Juventus won their league multiple times on the trot and reached a Champions League final. He played more or less every game.
Usually, I would argue that any team playing Victor Moses at right wing back couldn't top the Premier League, but looking at the evidence that would be bollocks. Rather like some of opinions in here.
His performance was terrible, for what it's worth. But he's far from the problem.
He's not playing for us this season like he was for Juventus. This season he has been very inconsistent and wouldn't have a right to play ahead of any of the midfielders at the current top teams. If he wants to play in an advanced three, he needs to perform much better than he is.
So we broke the transfer record for someone who can never be our main man? Somehow I doubt that was our thinking at the time.
Depends which top team.I'd be willing to wager that if he was at another "top team" he'd be playing a lot better.
Because it means that arguably three or four midfielders/forwards of £50-90 million quality will be needed before the team is actually good enough and Pogba is genuinely useful.Why are we splitting hairs about this "main man" thing? All that matters is whether he's good enough to be a starter in a team that competes on all fronts. He's done it once before and hopefully can again.
Because it means that arguably three or four midfielders/forwards of £50-90 million quality will be needed before the team is actually good enough and Pogba is genuinely useful.
Why are we splitting hairs about this "main man" thing? All that matters is whether he's good enough to be a starter in a team that competes on all fronts. He's done it once before and hopefully can again.
Jesus Christ this place loves a knee jerk.
Because it means that arguably three or four midfielders/forwards of £50-90 million quality will be needed before the team is actually good enough and Pogba is genuinely useful.
Why are we splitting hairs about this "main man" thing? All that matters is whether he's good enough to be a starter in a team that competes on all fronts. He's done it once before and hopefully can again.
So, given that Rakitic won the treble with Barca, he's worth a world record transfer? That's crazy. Pogba isn't supposed to be just good enough to start for United. He's supposed to make a big difference. Good enough are supposed to be the likes of Herrera, Mata, Valencia, etc. The expectations with Pogba are completely different.
Why are we splitting hairs about this "main man" thing? All that matters is whether he's good enough to be a starter in a team that competes on all fronts. He's done it once before and hopefully can again.
Why are we splitting hairs about this "main man" thing? All that matters is whether he's good enough to be a starter in a team that competes on all fronts. He's done it once before and hopefully can again.
I don't particularly care if he is the main man or not, I just want the team to play well.
At the same time, saying he actually can't be that main guy seems like a lowering of expectations to me. Whatever he does or doesn't turn out to be, we shouldn't place false ceilings on what we expect from him at this point.
If a club has smashed their transfer record for a player, you'd expect him to be a player who leads and who elevates the level of those around him. Not a player who needs to be led, or needs four or five equally/more talented players in order to play well.He's surrounded by the likes of Ibrahimovic, Mata, Herrera, Mkhitaryan and Martial, all of whom cost millions of pounds themselves. These are bloody good players.
I'm more concerned that we blow so much money on players without knowing what their best position is. It happened with Fellaini, di Maria, Martial (to a lesser extent), and now Pogba. Really shows a lack of proactive squad planning.
I'm more concerned that we blow so much money on players without knowing what their best position is. It happened with Fellaini, di Maria, Martial (to a lesser extent), and now Pogba. Really shows a lack of proactive squad planning.
Maybe it's not a matter of position so much as his specific role.wait...isn't he being played in his best position?
The money is spent. Arguing about exactly what we should have paid him is as stupid as the "main man" tangent.
wait...isn't he being played in his best position?
No-one argues abou the money. But the transfer sum is closely related to the expectations. Why break the world record for a player who is expected to be just good enough to start for United?That would be beyond daft. People are justified to expect much more from Pogba. They expect him to run games and dominate the opposition, not to be one of the many good enough to start players.
I'd be willing to wager that if he was at another "top team" he'd be playing a lot better.
So his lack of decision making and tendancy to overcomplicate things in the middle of the park would suddenly disappear if he were playing for say, Arsenal?