Paris terror attacks on Friday 13th

CNN just showed the video of the crowd panic. Apparently there was absolutely nothing kicked it off but within seconds there was a frantic stampede of people. Crazy stuff to watch!

Well it's not helped by the Police who seemed to be shouting at everyone to run. But yeah, everyone looked in a bit of a panic. Exactly what the terrorists want i'm afraid :(
 
nuns-singing.jpg
That's me in the corner,
That's me in the spotlight...
 
But it's not just Saudi Arabia, there are many countries, every country in fact, which have laws which people do not like - why should France or any other country for that matter change their laws to suit the people who don't like the laws. As per my earlier post they know what they can do. I may want to drive at 150mph but I can't, I may want to run down the Champs Elysée naked but I can't, I may want to smoke in a restaurant but I can't, I may want to steal all your money but I can't .That is why it is a democracy where people vote for people to run the country. Afraid it doesn't suit everyone but there you go.


Why? Those people are french. Why is it a good idea for a government to impose (meaningless) restrictions on its own people? What will banning the headscarf achieve?
 
That is completely right in this specific case. The problem is that for every time they would stop a terrorist act (not exactly stop, but have less victims) you would have 10 other mass shootings from nutters who can legally buy guns.
In France they get machine guns illegally but people can't buy guns for protection.
 
Or they came with the refugees with the fake passports

Why would they have the passports on them when they were doing this other than to make people think that way?

The passports were made in Europe too, how did they get there in the first place. Why get a fake Syrian one? Why would it make any sense in any sense other than to generate the terror you're demonstrating?
 
Muslim and Jewish leaders gather at Paris concert hall memorial

French Muslim leaders gathered outside the Bataclan concert hall on Sunday to honour the 89 people who died there in the bloodiest attack by jihadi terrorists France has known.

They carried white roses, which they laid amid the hundreds of candles and bouquets left by members of the public and were accompanied, as a show of inter-faith solidarity, by representatives of Paris’s Jewish community.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...leaders-gather-at-paris-concert-hall-memorial
 
Why? Those people are french. Why is it a good idea for a government to impose (meaningless) restrictions on its own people? What will banning the headscarf achieve?

The state and religion are two separate things - as someone pointed out you couldn't wear a nuns outfit either - if you ride a motorcycle you cannot wear the helmet, petty laws but sorry to upset a few people.
In certain countries in North Africa and the middle east, women are forced to have a certain dress code but that's ok is it whether they are from that country or not

In any event this has nothing to do with the events in Paris , it is sub-human barbarians hiding behind religion to satisfy their bloodlust which has happened by people from all different "religions" throughout the centuries
 
The state and religion are two separate things - as someone pointed out you couldn't wear a nuns outfit either - if you ride a motorcycle you cannot wear the helmet, petty laws but sorry to upset a few people.
In certain countries in North Africa and the middle east, women are forced to have a certain dress code but that's ok is it whether they are from that country or not

In any event this has nothing to do with the events in Paris , it is sub-human barbarians hiding behind religion to satisfy their bloodlust which has happened by people from all different "religions" throughout the centuries

I do not agree with those restrictions as well which is why I have to be consistent. Besides, I am not against/for the banning of head scarfs and whatnot but is it really beneficial considering a sizable population would want to wear it? I just can't see any positive coming from it at all.

It may not have a direct relationship with Paris but let's fact it: these attacks will increase anti-Islamic sentiments throughout Europe and the rest of the world and in that sense discussing restrictions/laws on Muslims is kind of important.
 
The municipality of Molenbeek is really coming into focus. Is it really that Bad?
 
I do not agree with those restrictions as well which is why I have to be consistent. Besides, I am not against/for the banning of head scarfs and whatnot but is it really beneficial considering a sizable population would want to wear it? I just can't see any positive coming from it at all.

It may not have a direct relationship with Paris but let's fact it: these attacks will increase anti-Islamic sentiments throughout Europe and the rest of the world and in that sense discussing restrictions/laws on Muslims is kind of important.

Yes they're will be more anti-Islamic feeling in Europe because these terrorists are claiming they are representing Islam. No other reason - so why doesn't the true islamic world put a stop to the terrorists themselves . France changing their headscarf laws will change nothing.
 
Yes they're will be more anti-Islamic feeling in Europe because these terrorists are claiming they are representing Islam. No other reason - so why doesn't the true islamic world put a stop to the terrorists themselves . France changing their headscarf laws will change nothing.

The true Islamic world putting a stop to it is unrelated to headscarves, but how do you suggest they do that? As for head scarves, if I were the leader of a nation and saw a section of my population being alienated from the rest I would try and make laws to accommodate them (laws that would have no other negative impact)
 
it is sub-human barbarians hiding behind religion to satisfy their bloodlust which has happened by people from all different "religions" throughout the centuries

In the right or wrong circumstances most people can descend to sub-human barbarism. Imo it's wrong to ascribe such events to pathological blood-lust. These people killed for a cause, not to satisfy their homicidal cravings.

Which isn't to say they were nice people to begin with. But in a different social context their inner darkness would never have seen the light.
 
In the right or wrong circumstances most people can descend to sub-human barbarism. Imo it's wrong to ascribe such events to pathological blood-lust. These people killed for a cause, not to satisfy their homicidal cravings.

Which isn't to say they were nice people to begin with. But in a different social context their inner darkness would never have seen the light.

That's BS. Half of these people are criminals/outcasts of their society. There is no "cause" here but a pseudo cause to hide behind their blood lust.
 
That's BS. Half of these people are criminals/outcasts of their society. There is no "cause" here but a pseudo cause to hide behind their blood lust.

There are hundreds of thousands of people working towards the IS cause - women and children are flocking there to be a part of the project from all sections of society. How ignorant must you be to believe that the IS phenomenon is merely about a few violent men acting to satisfy their sadism. Open your fecking eyes...there is a very clear cause and it is a religious one.
 
There are hundreds of thousands of people working towards the IS cause - women and children are flocking there to be a part of the project from all sections of society. How ignorant must you be to believe that the IS phenomenon is merely about a few violent men acting to satisfy their sadism. Open your fecking eyes...there is a very clear cause and it is a religious one.

you think the children going there have any say in the matter?
 
you think the children going there have any say in the matter?

It depends on which ones we are talking about. In the UK there have been a number of teenagers having traveled there independently of their families. Obviously very young children who are taken by their families have no choice, just as they have no choice about their religious identity.

This isn't just about young men looking for action...it's about a deluded mass of people who are hoping to play their part in the caliphate, about which they have been told in the madrasas and the mosques since childhood.
 
There are hundreds of thousands of people working towards the IS cause - women and children are flocking there to be a part of the project from all sections of society. How ignorant must you be to believe that the IS phenomenon is merely about a few violent men acting to satisfy their sadism. Open your fecking eyes...there is a very clear cause and it is a religious one.

Unfortunately you have no idea what you are talking about if you truly believe that. There is no shortage of blood lusting outcasts in the world. Tell them "We are fighting the infidels. You will be paid for it" and they will find a good enough excuse to kill.
 
It depends on which ones we are talking about. In the UK there have been a number of teenagers having traveled there independently of their families. Obviously very young children who are taken by their families have no choice, just as they have no choice about their religious identity.

This isn't just about young men looking for action...it's about a deluded mass of people who are hoping to play their part in the caliphate, about which they have been told in the madrasas and the mosques since childhood.

Just out of curiosity, have you ever been to a Madrasa? If so where was it?
 
Unfortunately you have no idea what you are talking about if you truly believe that. There is no shortage of blood lusting outcasts in the world. Tell them "We are fighting the infidels. You will be paid for it" and they will find a good enough excuse to kill.

And from where does the concept of the infidel being worthy of death derive?
 
It depends on which ones we are talking about. In the UK there have been a number of teenagers having traveled there independently of their families. Obviously very young children who are taken by their families have no choice, just as they have no choice about their religious identity.

This isn't just about young men looking for action...it's about a deluded mass of people who are hoping to play their part in the caliphate, about which they have been told in the madrasas and the mosques since childhood.

Why the extreme rhetoric and actions now though (past 70 years)?

How far back does it go? And how did the British end up controlling an empire which contained more Muslims than any other entity in human history? Surely those Muslim's would have slaughtered the Brit's right?
 
For every decent peace-loving Muslim I know there are at least 3 other Muslims who will go batshit crazy if I speak negatively of the Islam. I guess that's just me though as other people seem to have a thousand peace-loving Muslim friends.
Had two muslim friends and it was same - they joked about my religion all the time which never bothered me and if it was funny I always joined the laugh, when I or other of my friends said anything about Islam they went crazy how we dear.
Once one of them pulled out the knife when one of my friend said something about Islam and after that we never hangout again.
But I always gave benefit of the doubt that all the muslim are not the same since this two were hardcore Albanians who are not known as the most kind people.
 
Kind of a grim thread for my first post in the mains but as a Frenchman it is appropriate.

RIP and stay strong.
 
Kind of a grim thread for my first post in the mains but as a Frenchman it is appropriate.

RIP and stay strong.
Welcome up. Were you in Paris at the time?

Really good article from the former head of MI6 - http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/201f9a32-8b72-11e5-8be4-3506bf20cc2b.html?ftcamp=published_links/rss/comment/feed//product#axzz3rarRHps5

Part that concerns me most and will no doubt occur:

The next attack probably will not be in France. Isis wants to provoke division across Europe — in particular, hostility to the refugees flooding in. It wants the far right to grow in strength, further alienating European Muslims. Germany might be vulnerable as Isis would see an attack as weakening Chancellor Angela Merkel and dividing opinion. It could just as easily be in London: according to Andrew Parker, head of MI5, the UK domestic security agency, six terror attacks have been foiled in the UK this year already — though none, I suspect, as extensive as what we saw in Paris.

No surprise they primarily target France given that goal. Seems to be working as well.
 
Why the extreme rhetoric and actions now though (past 70 years)?

How far back does it go? And how did the British end up controlling an empire which contained more Muslims than any other entity in human history? Surely those Muslim's would have slaughtered the Brit's right?

I don't think that extreme religious rhetoric and violence is exclusive to the modern day Islamic world...it's just that it's relatively more pronounced in today's world. But it has always been there... since day one religious violence in the name of the Quran has been a problem. If you want an early example of Islam antagonising the West, even isolationist Thomas Jefferson was compelled to start a war to crush the Islamic Barbary States of North Africa due to the fact that they permitted mujahidin to carry out maritime atrocities on Americans and Europeans. These states claimed such violence was mandated by the Quran and as a result they could have no objection to the murder and rape that was being carried out on 'infidels' by the Muslim pirates. Jefferson wrote of his inability to reason with Barbary diplomats on account of their fundamental faith in the Quran and the right to violence it sets out.
 
French air strikes on IS in progress.

Edit: 20 munitions dropped on Raqqa, targeting Jihadi recruitment centre apparently.
 
The true Islamic world putting a stop to it is unrelated to headscarves, but how do you suggest they do that? As for head scarves, if I were the leader of a nation and saw a section of my population being alienated from the rest I would try and make laws to accommodate them (laws that would have no other negative impact)

As per my point all long, you cannot make laws to satisfy everybody, there is a reason for that law to be passed, not just to annoy certain sections of the society.
if headscarves are alienating one section of society from the rest of the country and leads them to turn to reprisals to the state the people or worse into terrorism, for pity's sake .
About time we finished with this namby-pamby attitude.

The islamic world should try to put a stop to the terrorism but the impression in the west is more that they encourage it whether this is true or not is another matter, the west are trying to stop the terrorism.