Except that that post absolutely puts the best possible spin on a set of results, a spin that simply doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. Frankly, during the “run”, our performances have oscillated wildly, between “decent” to “shocking”. Let’s not kid ourselves here - Ole has come in, and has won many (not all) games because the opposition were generally poor against us. That is no reflection on Ole, but it is still true.
- Tottenham - DDG got us through, when Tottenham really should have put us to the sword.
- Arsenal in the cup - it’s Arsenal, in the cup.
- PSG - they toyed with us, and that hubris brought their downfall.
When we have come up against teams that actually have the nous to simply go for our soft underbelly, we have been humiliated. The defeat to Arsenal? Wolves - we were actually humiliated by them, let’s not pretend we weren’t. Barcelona - how can we defend that performance? Everton? City? How many more times will we need to watch these performances to understand?
Ole was appointed because he loves his club, and was a cheap option. The fact he is loved by all of us, including me, should not blind us to reality. He’s not a top-level manager, and he hasn’t got the managerial tools required to do the job, or the force of personality and track record to take on the club hierarchy.
Ole will be made a scapegoat for the failings of the club. That is the bitter truth many of us suspect - he won’t be backed to the extent needed to rehabilitate this failing institution, his reputation will be tarnished by a squad of mercenaries, and by Christmas, a club legend will be humiliated and ignominiously sacked, while the core of our club is further hollowed out. Vulture capitalism ad infinitum.