hoped to get him onboard on his viagra-promotionPele secretly raging he didn't arrive in time to meet LVG and learn the Way of the Horny.
hoped to get him onboard on his viagra-promotionPele secretly raging he didn't arrive in time to meet LVG and learn the Way of the Horny.
This plus about 34 seconds against Bayern when Evra scored that screamer. That was our lot from Moyes.Maybe they remember the bayer neverlosin 0-5 away game. Was some performance to be fair. But a rare shinging light in a sea of gloom.
This plus about 34 seconds against Bayern when Evra scored that screamer. That was our lot from Moyes.
I'll give you that but even his solitary win against anyone significant in the league (Arsenal Home) was a bloody diabolical game. Anyway, off thread topic but lets leave it at: Moyes good football? LolThe first game of the season was excellent too, when we battered Swansea 4-1 away. The chip which Welbeck scored that day is still one of my favourite goals ever - sheer class.
....
And the "my house" comment
Looking at the number of effusive reactions (and the poll numbers too, wow, 63% couldn't be happier as of now) is making me realise more and more that I belong to the more apprehensive crowd. While he has a proven track record for winning, a can't-help-but-grudgingly-admire level of cunning, and a personality worthy of managing one of the best clubs, the style of football he usually encourages isn't the best of look at. I know we've faced some rank football these last three years, and even some trademark anti-football will look better if its effective, but it still won't be the 'United way' we've grown up watching and fallen in love with. He certainly *seems* more mature now, and hopefully he will be more concerned about building a long-lasting dynasty replete with a healthy dose of United youth, but we don't know that for sure.
Given the options available, I am quite happy, but not ecstatic. To be completely honest, I really wanted Klopp here. He would have been the perfect fit, more so than anyone, even the Special One. It feels really strange to welcome Mourinho here instead. That said, I really want to be proven wrong. Hopefully ten years down the line I'll be looking at this post and grinning wryly at my skepticism.
Ahhh just some dude who advertises viagraWho is this Pele chap?
Why isn't he wearing the club blazer?
Not an official club event? Anyway, don't go trying to besmirch Mourinho.
Looking at the number of effusive reactions (and the poll numbers too, wow, 63% couldn't be happier as of now) is making me realise more and more that I belong to the more apprehensive crowd. While he has a proven track record for winning, a can't-help-but-grudgingly-admire level of cunning, and a personality worthy of managing one of the best clubs, the style of football he usually encourages isn't the best of look at. I know we've faced some rank football these last three years, and even some trademark anti-football will look better if its effective, but it still won't be the 'United way' we've grown up watching and fallen in love with. He certainly *seems* more mature now, and hopefully he will be more concerned about building a long-lasting dynasty replete with a healthy dose of United youth, but we don't know that for sure.
Given the options available, I am quite happy, but not ecstatic. To be completely honest, I really wanted Klopp here. He would have been the perfect fit, more so than anyone, even the Special One. It feels really strange to welcome Mourinho here instead. That said, I really want to be proven wrong. Hopefully ten years down the line I'll be looking at this post and grinning wryly at my skepticism.
Ibra's strike partner next season.Who is this Pele chap?
Never heard of the black Rooney?Who is this Pele chap?
It hasnt been debunked. Its an opinion. The number of goals doesnt mean a team is good to watch. Stats dont indicate if a style of football is pleasing on the eye to everyone.I think that's been mostly debunked already. Barring last season, the stats don't lie, his teams score goals.
Saying his first Chelsea team and his Madrid team didn't play good football is also bollocks. Both those teams often played great football.It hasnt been debunked. Its an opinion. The number of goals doesnt mean a team is good to watch. Stats dont indicate if a style of football is pleasing on the eye to everyone.
I dont like his style of football. His teams throttle the life out of other sides and his teams win. Its very effective and yes there are plenty of goals scored.
But for me personally I dont find his style of football attractive. Now I know I am in the minority here but saying its been debunked is bollocks.
It hasnt been debunked. Its an opinion. The number of goals doesnt mean a team is good to watch. Stats dont indicate if a style of football is pleasing on the eye to everyone.
I dont like his style of football. His teams throttle the life out of other sides and his teams win. Its very effective and yes there are plenty of goals scored.
But for me personally I dont find his style of football attractive. Now I know I am in the minority here but saying its been debunked is bollocks.
Its a matter of opinion and taste. Thats the point.Saying his first Chelsea team and his Madrid team didn't play good football is also bollocks. Both those teams often played great football.
For what its worth i dont think Mourinho plays attractive football, i think alot of people are making up things to fit the story that hes the perfect manager. Klopp would have been a far better fit for style of play in my opinion.It hasnt been debunked. Its an opinion. The number of goals doesnt mean a team is good to watch. Stats dont indicate if a style of football is pleasing on the eye to everyone.
I dont like his style of football. His teams throttle the life out of other sides and his teams win. Its very effective and yes there are plenty of goals scored.
But for me personally I dont find his style of football attractive. Now I know I am in the minority here but saying its been debunked is bollocks.
"I'm so sad as almost for sure it's my last game with Inter," stated Mourinho after the Nerazzurri beat Bayern Munich in Madrid. "If you don't coach Real Madrid then you always have a gap in your career."
He continued: "It was difficult to leave Chelsea and it will be sad to leave Inter. Inter is my house in the same way Chelsea was my house. But that's life, that's football.
"Now I have two houses, Stamford Bridge, San Siro and now a third house - probably the Santiago Bernabeu.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/europe/8699064.stm
Everyone banging on about the united way we didn't even have free flowing attack for last 3 years of Fergies reign...
...Besides, the Chelsea and Real Madrid team Mourinho coached were never lacking in goals. Madrid in particular had devastating counter attacks. I doubt we'd be seeing anything similar to Van Gaal's brand of impotent football.
I think that's been mostly debunked already. Barring last season, the stats don't lie, his teams score goals.
The United way involves playing football that scores goals, entertains fans, and wins trophies...
I know it's been a long descent, but I am only considering who would be best to count on re-creating the playing style of yore.
I admire the way Mourinho led the Inter Milan team to victory in the UCL, there was some defensive masterclasses involved. I am not sure if I'll be able to enjoy it as much seeing United play that way, though. While I appreciate that every advantage, including superior tactics, is necessary to win leagues, I suppose I'll always yearn for the more exciting, risky wins that look great. If Mourinho can somehow strike a balance between the two, using defensive football only when necessary, then it would be perfect.
What's this stuff about Moyes getting us played decent football?
When did that happen exactly?
There will be some people who will swear to their death beds that Moyes wasn't that bad.
He still has his admirers.
How can something like that ever be debunked? A style can never be narrowed down and understood in terms of numbers. I am not saying his teams do or do not play entertaining football but to suggest that one can prove one or the other is just wrong.I think that's been mostly debunked already. Barring last season, the stats don't lie, his teams score goals.
That is weird, I can atleast understand loyalty to Van Gaal because the man has his charisma, Moyes on the other hand has the charisma of a wet tissue paper.
It hasnt been debunked. Its an opinion. The number of goals doesnt mean a team is good to watch. Stats dont indicate if a style of football is pleasing on the eye to everyone.
I dont like his style of football. His teams throttle the life out of other sides and his teams win. Its very effective and yes there are plenty of goals scored.
But for me personally I dont find his style of football attractive. Now I know I am in the minority here but saying its been debunked is bollocks.
Hey, there's always people who would fancy a wet tissue paper and some that have a fetish for golden showers. And I am Not hinting my personal fetishes here, Thank you.That is weird, I can atleast understand loyalty to Van Gaal because the man has his charisma, Moyes on the other hand has the charisma of a wet tissue paper.
Absolutely, no argument thereI am 100% sure there's going to be better football played under Mourinho then LVG and thats good enough for me.
Indeed.Lolz.. Just because everyone is getting all orgasmic about the "New House" comment, now we have added that to title.
Taking the Mou fanfare to a new level.
BrilliantNever heard of the black Rooney?
I have to say that these comments are doing nothing for me. Less talk, more action please.