DatIrishFella
Band of Brothers, Thief
My favourite Oasis song.
My favourite Oasis song.
Not sure how it'll be out there in the UK but I'd used Ticketmaster for the Taylor Swift concert in Singapore and it was a massive headache. Firstly, although only those with an "access code" were permitted to actually buy tickets, everyone (even without the codes) showed up in the queue. Given there were 6 shows which totaled to around 330k in capacity, I was 780,000th in the queue and didn't think I'd stand a chance. I still managed to get tickets primarily because probably 70% of the idiots ahead of me had no access code. I have no idea if that is how it works in the UK. And in my case, I could alternate between the six different dates (all at the same venue though) in the ten minute window that I got once I got through the queue. You'll need to be really quick with your payment details (ideally keep them saved on Chrome if you're okay with that) because these tickets absolutely fly off the shelves. I think the queuing numbers are just random so best of luck with that.Does anyone use Ticketmaster regularly who may be able to help with some potentially naive questions? As someone who would genuinely go to any of the venues/dates to secure a ticket, what is the best approach to take? Do I need to commit to one venue/date and join the queue for that date only, or do I join the queue and then when it's my turn select whatever venue/date is left? What if I go for Wembley and am 750,000th in the queue - do I leave and then try and join a queue for Heaton Park?
It was both. Get it right.It was QuOasis, get it right.
You’re right. Apologies.Leave Status Quo alone!
Went to one last night.I think we’ve probably had enough old men tell us how shit oasis are in this thread now
As if you still go to gigs anyway
Not sure how it'll be out there in the UK but I'd used Ticketmaster for the Taylor Swift concert in Singapore and it was a massive headache. Firstly, although only those with an "access code" were permitted to actually buy tickets, everyone (even without the codes) showed up in the queue. Given there were 6 shows which totaled to around 330k in capacity, I was 780,000th in the queue and didn't think I'd stand a chance. I still managed to get tickets primarily because probably 70% of the idiots ahead of me had no access code. I have no idea if that is how it works in the UK. And in my case, I could alternate between the six different dates (all at the same venue though) in the ten minute window that I got once I got through the queue. You'll need to be really quick with your payment details (ideally keep them saved on Chrome if you're okay with that) because these tickets absolutely fly off the shelves. I think the queuing numbers are just random so best of luck with that.
Further, once you are in the queue, you'll usually be limited to how many tickets you can buy. In my case, it was four. Also, in my case, if you select 2/3/4 tickets, they try give it to you next to each other and (in my experience again and this may not happen to you) if they can't provide you with seats together, you go back to the seat/venue selection stage and waste precious seconds. I'm not sure if this will be the case in UK though.
Yeh this morningHas anyone got email confirmation yet from the pre sale ballot?
I though Definitely Maybe only had one good song on it. What's The Story was a very strong album but I though everything after that was a pale shadow of their best.
And were pretty derivative of the Beatles even at their peak.Amongst the "big and famous" British bands I got tired of Oasis the quickest since they never tried to innovate. Every single song in, say. Don't Believe the Truth can be inserted into Morning Glory seamlessly. The Gallagher brothers fail to mature musically
are they back as a band or are they back temporarily to make a few million and then fug off again into the wilderness?
Can we expect new music?
Nah no way will there be anything neware they back as a band or are they back temporarily to make a few million and then fug off again into the wilderness?
Can we expect new music?
are they back as a band or are they back temporarily to make a few million and then fug off again into the wilderness?
Can we expect new music?
Really weird that they’ve not just done their own festival. Find a spot of land that’s used for large UK Festivals. Both play some solo stuff on the small stage. Bring in a bunch of up and coming bands to fill out some afternoons.
Main gigantic stage
Thursday Night - Definitely Maybe start to finish
Friday Night - What’s the Story start to finish
Saturday - Be Here Now start to finish
Sunday evening - Full set of hits
I guess it probably makes less money, but it’s a bit more inspiring and bakes in a legacy more than rocking up at Wembley for 10 nights or whatever.
I think Wembley costs around £750k per night and they take a 10-15% cut of all ticket sales.
I've always found the dad rock term to be pretty daft. Almost like there's two categories of music. Music that appeals to anybody under 20/25, and then music 'for people above that age'. Just seems stupid to put music in those boxes. Music is music and can be listened to by anybody.
Different music appeals to different people. And young people will often create and listen to music that is, in part, about pushing back against what their parent's generation listened to. This will often result in music thats difficult for many older people to access. I don't think this point is even contentious, the history of music is filled with examples.
I hear their songs everywhere all the time. And I'm not some London ponce who is out looking for some new sound either, despite the fact I am exactly that as much as I can be.
I don't agree they haven't aged well though. Who is putting out music better than their last few albums in the same genre right now? Sure, you might come up with 100+ bands we'd all agree might be better in some way or another, but if we all put our preening opinions to the side for one moment and actually look at the songs they put out...
We are living in the age of the likes of Coldplay and Taylor Swift being the biggest artists. At least Oasis were always them.
See, I do think there’s a difference between ‘dated’ and ‘young people don’t like this anymore’ … I was VERY much in the age range when Oasis were big. Slightly too young if anything to actually enjoy Britpop proper. I’m of the generation where it was your mates cool older siblings who were listening to it, which made it even cooler! but now I’m older the likes of Blur and Radiohead have definitely aged better and I personally hear in more TV shows/ads etc. Granted there are still pubs that play Oasis more, but their sound was a lot less sophisticated and so a lot more “of” that era than even a lot of their contemporary’s. Even those 2 big Ocean Colour Scene songs still get a huge amount of play, cos they’ve dated quite well, musically.
I mean a lot of Bowie stuff hasn’t dated, but a lot of Prince stuff has. Soul largely hasnt dated but Hair Metal has. It’s not just about the passing of time. Oasis are one of those bands where you watch a retrospective and hear people say “their music was edgy and raw and for the people!” and then they cut to a clip of “Some Might Say” and it sounds incredibly naff. Like when people talk about the Satanic panic era and then cut to the cheesiest glam metal bollocks you’ve ever heard. Or even early Beatles stuff with women screaming over clean cup boppy love songs. But then nothing on Revolver has dated. Nor have a lot of The Stones stuff. Nirvana havent dated, etc
The difference obviously was that - unlike the Beatles - Oasis never l progressed from that one sound* There’s some stuff that hasn’t dated sure - Live Forever, Supersonic, fecking In The Bushes etc - but a lot of the album tracks and even the big ballads just sound a bit twee now, even to someone who grew up with them.
* Ironically the best Britpop Beatles rip off was Beetlebum, which is way more like their later stuff than any of Oasis was.
But hey, that’s just my take on it. I’m certainly a lot more generous towards them than some…
They want this (understandably, in my opinion) to be all about them. They also want to make as much money from it as possible, not least because both will be acutely aware of the potential for this to literally be the last ever Oasis tour.
Also, your festival idea sounds shite. Noel and Liam booking themselves to be their own support acts, but on a secondary stage, while a different band plays the main stage?
But it'd be the same 250,000 people over the whole of those dates, which would make them a lot less money.Oh yeah, OasisFest would be so much less about them wouldn’t it?……. 250,000 people in fields for 5 days with them playing every song they’ve ever made.
Also… only shite for you mate. Odd that you decided in my invented festival machinations that I’d had Noel playing on a small stage while someone else played the main?…
283
But it'd be the same 250,000 people over the whole of those dates, which would make them a lot less money.
Also, your own post literally said they'd play solo sets on the smaller stage.
Oh yeah, OasisFest would be so much less about them wouldn’t it?……. 250,000 people in fields for 5 days with them playing every song they’ve ever made.
Also… only shite for you mate. Odd that you decided in my invented festival machinations that I’d had Noel playing on a small stage while someone else played the main?…
283
Both play some solo stuff on the small stage.
I didn’t mean to not do any stadium dates at all… I meant a full on narcissistic 5 dayer. Also, a festival ticket would cost £250. The numbers would work.
Yes to the bold, But not at the same time the Main stage is in service. Y’know, Like a normal festival.
You can’t tell me you wouldn’t dream a little bigger if you were an artist that could guarantee a million ticket sales? Chapelles block party. John Mayers ‘Mayercraft’. I’d be looking to put up something huge with long lasting cultural impact than a bunch of stadium gigs.
But then again… it’s for their bank accounts, not the fans. So I get it.
Oh yeah, OasisFest would be so much less about them wouldn’t it?……. 250,000 people in fields for 5 days with them playing every song they’ve ever made.
Also… only shite for you mate. Odd that you decided in my invented festival machinations that I’d had Noel playing on a small stage while someone else played the main?…
283
Sounds like hell on earth.
So you'd have a 5 day festival cost £50 per night? Like I say, they'd make far, far less in ticket sales that way. And the money is obviously the key motivator here.I didn’t mean to not do any stadium dates at all… I meant a full on narcissistic 5 dayer. Also, a festival ticket would cost £250. The numbers would work.
Yes to the bold, But not at the same time the Main stage is in service. Y’know, Like a normal festival.
You can’t tell me you wouldn’t dream a little bigger if you were an artist that could guarantee a million ticket sales? Chapelles block party. John Mayers ‘Mayercraft’. I’d be looking to put up something huge with long lasting cultural impact than a bunch of stadium gigs.
But then again… it’s for their bank accounts, not the fans. So I get it.
It's actually genius. If they end up falling out again midway through, they can both perform the same songs on separate stages.Stop trying to make Oasis fest happen, it's not going to happen, and it's a blessing and a sign that god might be real that it's not a thing. Horrific idea.
It's actually genius. If they end up falling out again midway through, they can both perform the same songs on separate stages.
I was thinking the same thing. 1995 to 2010 seems like waaaaaay longer.In my head 2009 is not that long ago, it’s mental that it’s actually 15 years.
Maths ey?