GaryLifo
Liverpool's Secret Weapon.
if we're not in the mix for this I am baffled.
I suspect we're not mate. Addressing the gaping hole in midfield is a blind spot at our club.
if we're not in the mix for this I am baffled.
-----Lucas--------Sahin
-----------Gerrard
That's a very competitive midfield 3, especially if Gerrard is able to get anywhere near his best form.
(with Allen, Henderson, Spearing/Shelvey as backup)
Sahin wants to go to Arsenal, Mourinho prefers Liverpool
Nuri Sahin may have the definitive answer on his future this very week. Everything points to the Turkish midfielder's destiny lying in the Premier League. The player who was voted Bundesliga Player of the Year only two seasons ago still has a good reputation in Europe.
Madrid wants the player to regain his confidence and form by playing regularly in a competitive league. They still have faith at the Bernabéu that he has a promising future; he is only 23 and has a contract until 2017. That is the reason Real Madrid is only considering a loan agreement or, otherwise, a transfer in which it maintains a repurchase option. There do not appear to be any obstacles to a deal as both Arsenal and Liverpool are well disposed to Madrid's proposal.
Herein lies the problem, however. The player would prefer to join Arsène Wenger's team in Arsenal. The offer from the Gunners and the chance to play alongside footballers like Robin Van Persie or even Santi Cazorla, appeals to the Turk. However, Madrid's manager sees Liverpool as ideal. Mourinho has his reasons for that.
Liverpool's manager, Brendan Rodgers, had his introduction to the Premier League as coach of Chelsea's reserve team while Mou was in charge. He is someone Mou trusts and admires. "Liverpool will relive its glory days with Rodgers", he commented on learning of the Reds' new managerial appointment.
To be honest, I'd be disgusted if Liverpool were able to get him on loan and we made no effort for him. We need to strengthen the midfield, it's as simple as that. This guy fits the bill perfectly. I'm astounded that we are not being linked with him.
Plus he would work brilliantly with Kagawa.
Not for 1 year though what is the point in that? strengthen real madrid just to have 1 more option?.
If we can buy him permanently afterwards then im all for it, but just for a 1 year loan deal is stupid.
How is it stupid? We brought back a 37 year old out of retirement last season because we were so weak in midfield.
Having an extra option in midfield could be a difference in us winning the league or not. How many times to we have to get overrun in midfield to realise that we are short there?
We are obviously not buying anyone at this stage, so why not bring a player in for a year?
To be honest, I'd be disgusted if Liverpool were able to get him on loan and we made no effort for him. We need to strengthen the midfield, it's as simple as that. This guy fits the bill perfectly. I'm astounded that we are not being linked with him.
Plus he would work brilliantly with Kagawa.
SAF has too much pride, and we are too big of a club to sign a player on loan, without a permanent buying option. It's stupid. Mourinho knows that Fergie wouldn't play him much even if we were told to keep him for a year, and not pay any wages. He'd get frozen out like Berbatov was; for the same reason, they aren't going to be here long, why give them games if there are other players that can perform decently as well, who will (i.e. Welbeck / Hernandez).
I'm against signing him on loan, but full muppet on bringing him here on a complete transfer, or even with a buy back option, provided we say, sign him for 20 million, and Real can resign him for 40m (provided the player wants to go back). But it won't work out like that, so we won't get him unless Real and the player want to come here with a view to a permanent transfer
if ferguson wanted sahin, he should've bought him for cheap from dortmund in the first place.
Doing a loan would be stupid.
That's for shitc**ts like the vermin who are desperate to get into top4 and will let themselves be incubators of talent for bigger clubs. I know we sold ronnie after developing him, but that isn't as smalltime as this.
If I was a Liverpool fan I'd be worried that the owners don't seem to want to put their hands in their pocket for proper signings, instead messing around with loan deals which only bring short-term benefit. Unless they get a option to purchase, then it would make alot more sense.
Mourinho must have put in a good word for Rodgers, then say Wenger.The Liverpool Echo are apparently very confident Sahin is signing within 48 hours, even reporting that Sahin has informed Rodgers that he wants to join us.
Developing young players is always risky, as they'll probably contribute to dropped points while they're still learning the game. This is a risk worth taking if you're developing them into a better player for the future. Kind of pointless if that future is at another club.
Developing young players is always risky, as they'll probably contribute to dropped points while they're still learning the game. This is a risk worth taking if you're developing them into a better player for the future. Kind of pointless if that future is at another club.
Developing young players is always risky, as they'll probably contribute to dropped points while they're still learning the game. This is a risk worth taking if you're developing them into a better player for the future. Kind of pointless if that future is at another club.
Ahm?! They've got Allen, Sahin (if he signs), Gerrard, Lucas, Henderson, Spearing and Shelvey. We've got Carrick, Cleverley, Scholes, Anderson, Giggs & even Kagawa (as much a CM as Gerrard). You really think they've got a better midfield? I'd have ours any day of the week and twice on Sunday.I can't believe Liverpool will have a better midfield than us.
Any sources lads?