Sees 'boring' as drogatory but feels 'cnut' is cool. Interesting.
Maybe, but reading his post, I interpreted (possibly mistakenly) "Now over the last few years, our identity is being stripped away, with street signs in Irish, more and more things being "given away" to appease Nationalists." as being his own opinion, which is what I'm interested in having explained.
Sees 'boring' as drogatory but feels 'cnut' is cool. Interesting.
Yup. And if they can claim persecution in that set up imagine how they'll squeal at true equality.
Maybe, but reading his post, I interpreted (possibly mistakenly) "Now over the last few years, our identity is being stripped away, with street signs in Irish, more and more things being "given away" to appease Nationalists." as being his own opinion, which is what I'm interested in having explained.
Read what I was responding to.
I'll ask this question to both sides.
What is so important about holding on to your nationality?
Why the need to be affiliated with a country that really doesn't care about you one way or the other?
Why flaunt your nationality, like its some sort of award of achievement? Does it help you in any way? Does it put food on your table, money in your pocket or a roof over your head?
People complain that their culture/heritage is being taken away but if you go back far enough, probably none of our ancestors were indiginous to this island.
Add to this the fact that all of us are actually governed by the European Union, to me its starting to make less and less sense to desperate ourselves by nationality.
Couldn't agree more, it's got to the point where it really is a load of auld shite. No compromise will please everyone so we'd be as well just doing what Philip I think it was suggested, and stick a pirates flag up.
What do you add to these discussions PJ? Other than petty little digs? You constantly talk about what the Unionist side will never be able to do, whilst constantly giving off the air of a bitter little feck who will never let the past go. Your attitude makes you no better than those knobheads out on the streets.
What reconciliation are you interested in with your endless pettiness?
Facts, opinions and questions. Sorry I haven't reached your quota of personal insults yet.
Seriously, stop.
Couldn't agree more, it's got to the point where it really is a load of auld shite. No compromise will please everyone so we'd be as well just doing what Philip I think it was suggested, and stick a pirates flag up.
Stop what? He's at it all the time and it just gets fecking ignored. I wouldn't get away with it.
Show me one occasion where I've been in here slating nationalists or Republicans and calling them out for this or that? Not once. But Unionists can be made out to be all the cnuts of the day with impunity.
Stop calling people cnuts, bitter fecks and arseholes?
Do I really need to explain that?
wow.
And where has PJ insulted you peronally?
It's constant wee digs at the whole Unionist community. You make a fool of yourself if you pretend you don't see it.
Pointing out that we are in an unequal society and that parts of that society are clearly unwilling to move towards equality (reacting with disproportionate violence to the smallest of movements) is not "no better" than attacking the police, throwing petrol bombs into cars with women inside them, destroying the economy, and generally making lives miserable.
Or does it really annoy you that much to hear the truth that you can somehow equate the two?
He's entitled to not like Unionists, like you are entitled to call catholic areas shitholes.
You are not entitled to insult him personally.
I saw both so you can stop with your incorrect butthurt assumptions.
The same joke about flags that was told earlier in the thread about Union flags and painted kerbs.
same joke, different target, different reaction.
TN is on a CE holiday.
TN is on a CE holiday.
He should be allowed to post here on designated days I think.
I'll get my coat.
It's the members of the unionist community who stoke it up, encourage it, and go around repeating the hollow, baseless rhetoric of erosion of identity and financial isolation, who should be ashamed. Lots of unionists, like basil mccrea for examlle, have nothing to be ashamed of.
And I really don't get why you constantly equate not wanting to bend over and accept relentless loyalist triumphalism, and the keeping of Catholics in their place, as not wanting change or reconciliation.
I've stated it time and time again, I want a peaceful future where neither side feels the need to keep the other downtrodden, and the border issue is decided either way bh democratic means.
Gerry Kelly sums up the point I've been trying to make to GB very well (look what this has reduced me tl, I'll be mentioning securocrats next...) http://www.sinnfein.ie/contents/25383
He should be allowed to post here on designated days I think.
I'll get my coat.
A lot less than would were it not banned.
You can't ban a language, put us in jail for learning it on the sly then give us shit for not knowing it as a nation. That's just not cricket.
You thinking of reclaiming the States too? None of them speak Sioux.
You can't call every decision taken by elected representatives rather than going to referendum undemocratic, we'd never get anything done.
The reasons for taking it down are simple, in a shared city there is no need for one side or the other to triumphantly "claim" city hall. Designated days is a reasonable compromise, and one which keeps us in line with many UK councils.
A referendum on whether to fly a fecking flag? A decision of magnitude? Wise up tdon!
I think the reasons for taking it down are more questionable, tbh.
I've lived my whole life in a 100% nationalist area of West Belfast.
I've heard the grand total of 'feck all' people complain about the Union Flag being flown at City Hall and even less that knew it was there.
They say it was a 'democratic decision' to take the flag down. Was it really?
How many people got the chance to vote on the subject? None.
It was noting more than one political party, trying to get one over on the other.
A pure cock measuring exercise. The thing that gets me is, they did it, knowing full well what the repercussions would be.
The alternative don is to consider the potential unionist backlash for every step towards equality, and just not bother. Just keep our heads down and be grateful we can at least get jobs these days? Until they get angry over some existing equal status we have, and kick off until that's taken away from us too. In other words, bow to the violence?
Surely the fact this democratic decision to fly the union flag and keep belfast in line with the other UK cities has provoked such a violent reaction from those who profess to love the uk shows that the stupidity does not lie with the peolle who voted on this issue.
They could very reasonably have expected the unionist community to acknowledge it was line with other UK cities. Ridiculous to criticise them for not pre emptively giving in to disproportionate thrrats of violence.
Makes the need for signage a little needless really.
Maybe prior to the decision, SF thought the unionist community were slightly more civilised than a dumb angry beast?
And they probably were expecting a political backlash, hence the timing of it to hopefully let it die down before the next elections, but violence on this scale? No way.
You keep saying this, but you and I both know you don't believe it.
How many times has the nationalist community went buck mad and started riots when a 'democratic decision' didn't go our way?
They knew it would happen. 100%