The old he has 'PL experience' that gets thrown in by everybody will make sure of that. If he gets backed he should have us up and running quickly apparently. It is if the owners/board think we need a complete change at the club. I personally do. At the moment it is which signing do the board think will excite the fans, throw a team together and expect it to work when it blatantly won't. We need a plan and a man to carry it out.
To be fair social media isn't a great barometer. It attracts a lot of bandwagon fans who don't know much.
Its either leaks or media clutching at straws.
Whitwell isn't that type of journalist. He normally reports what he's fed from established club sources.
Then they're just muddying the water all the while maybe having decided already. I dont think it makes them incompetent although I dont know whats the purpose on the other hand.
I think it makes them look incompetent because they're trying to brief updates to show the process is ongoing but they look like lemons by not knowing who they want.
It means the same thing.I think it makes them look incompetent because they're trying to brief updates to show the process is ongoing but they look like lemons by not knowing who they want.
Undoubtedly the club have seen 99% of the press tip to ETH's favour which may well be true. But cooling that idea whilst the process continues was likely the play - they look to have done this by citing Poch can be gotten without too much hassle too and we'll have a third round with both. But that just makes them look unsure
Would rather Shrager's updates which was "ETH talks going well but nothing imminent". Fine with that
Also it could be damaging to the whole process if they just leak the info of ETH being appointed. I dont know. Maybe they're still unsure, its a process and a really important decision. Personally I think they've already decided and this all is a formality.Me too, we think its Poch right?It means the same thing.
Yeah, who knows what's the leak and how is put by the media, some things, words are lost in translation sometimes.Me too, we think its Poch right?
Seriously though, I get what you mean. I just prefer briefs that don't make us look like we're lost between the two is all. There are different ways to word it and anything to avoid the impression we have no clue would be a good start.
Too much smoke at the moment not to be him.If the club is incapable of making the correct football decisions without needing to check fan sentiments first, we're absolutely doomed.
Fans are rarely right about most business decisions around their clubs as they're too emotional, so I'd take anything the fan's 'want' with a pinch of salt if it's clear Ten Hag isn't up to it during the interview process.
1. over a larger scale people opinions has value.
No but it points to the exaggeration of stats
That makes no sense.
In what way is Pochettino a yes man?
ETH said yes to the board about his stars leaving like De Jong, VDB, De Ligt, and Ziyech. Is that not yes man? As far what I know, most managers (apart from Conte) are yes man because they are working for the owner, which is a common sense in job. Even Klopp just accepted it in 2019/2020 for not having a new player in the summer.
So they are also saying Ole, Carrick and McKenna were no good, also as you said Jose has rubbish coaches and LVG has rubbish coaches. Will love to see if any of this lot make it as coaches as they are so all knowing.
Yup, my first thought too.
Only if its Ten Hags choice. If its something the board wants Ten Hag to accept , they can feck off
