Rolaholic
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2016
- Messages
- 12,803
d) they aren't looking for a manager right now, so they are an irrelevanceSo Man City need a new manager soon, they seem to be happy for United to get Ten Hag.
Makes you wonder a) If they know Hag isn't good enough b) they have someone better lined up (why haven't we in that case?) c) they know everything we touch is posion and best to simply avoid.
d) they aren't looking for a manager right now, so they are an irrelevance
Ten Hag has been long reported to leave Ajax this summer. Timing wouldn't have worked out.End of next season, City seem to be very good planners.
You'd think if Hag was even in their top 5 they would have spoken to him by now.
I wanted ETH or Enrique. We are getting ETH, but I reckon City get Enrique after he wins the WC with Spain
Poch literally said a couple of weeks ago he wanted to finish his career at City.So Man City need a new manager soon, they seem to be happy for United to get Ten Hag.
Makes you wonder a) If they know Hag isn't good enough b) they have someone better lined up (why haven't we in that case?) c) they know everything we touch is posion and best to simply avoid.
Seriously though. The amount of weird reasons that come from our fans is just staggering. Man, we made a good appointment. Just appreciate it for a change. Let's hope it works out well !Ten Hag has been long reported to leave Ajax this summer. Timing wouldn't have worked out.
Anyway, quit trying to second guess what City would do and work on ourselves. We look like we have gotten the right man in this time.
I knew it was too good to be true about the change in direction etc.
So it's back to Darren Fletcher in the dugout with ETH.
They don’t need one right now though, why would ten Hag wait for them when he can join us next season? Pep guardiola might not even leave soon anyway, he said he’d happily stay there another 10 years. When he does leave they’ll probably get Enrique who fits the same profile as pep.So Man City need a new manager soon, they seem to be happy for United to get Ten Hag.
Makes you wonder a) If they know Hag isn't good enough b) they have someone better lined up (why haven't we in that case?) c) they know everything we touch is posion and best to simply avoid.
So Man City need a new manager soon, they seem to be happy for United to get Ten Hag.
Makes you wonder a) If they know Hag isn't good enough b) they have someone better lined up (why haven't we in that case?) c) they know everything we touch is posion and best to simply avoid.
That would mean that Ten Hag would have to work with the staff members who now assist Rangnick
agree about Jose, whatever most people here say. we need a tough line and it turns out he was right about our defenceNeeds to rebuild the club, also Jesus Christ would fail
Mourinho still the best one post Ferguson
So Man City need a new manager soon, they seem to be happy for United to get Ten Hag.
Makes you wonder a) If they know Hag isn't good enough b) they have someone better lined up (why haven't we in that case?) c) they know everything we touch is posion and best to simply avoid.
End of next season, City seem to be very good planners.
You'd think if Hag was even in their top 5 they would have spoken to him by now.
Is this a joke?So Man City need a new manager soon, they seem to be happy for United to get Ten Hag.
Makes you wonder a) If they know Hag isn't good enough b) they have someone better lined up (why haven't we in that case?) c) they know everything we touch is posion and best to simply avoid.
Is this a joke?
Why would City hire ten Hag when they have Pep? I've seen nothing to suggest Pep is leaving at the end of the season. He'll be there for another year at least.
Pep is leaving next season.
The point (in jest) that I was making, was, everytime we go for someone City also potentially wanted, it has backfired to City's benefit.
But it will be interesting to see the direction City's take when appointing their next manager.
So Man City need a new manager soon, they seem to be happy for United to get Ten Hag.
Makes you wonder a) If they know Hag isn't good enough b) they have someone better lined up (why haven't we in that case?) c) they know everything we touch is posion and best to simply avoid.
He didn't decide yet. Last month he said that he will talk about it when time will be right (so when season ends i guess). I would not be surprised that he signs new contract. And even if he is leaving it is after next season. Do you expect that City will approach to some manager and say; "look, we have a job for you but you need to wait 2 years. And yeah, it is not 100% sure".Pep is leaving next season.
The point (in jest) that I was making, was, everytime we go for someone City also potentially wanted, it has backfired to City's benefit.
But it will be interesting to see the direction City's take when appointing their next manager.
He didn't decide yet. Last month he said that he will talk about it when time will be right (so when season ends i guess). I would not be surprised that he signs new contract. And even if he is leaving it is after next season. Do you expect that City will approach to some manager and say; "look, we have a job for you but you need to wait 2 years. And yeah, it is not 100% sure".
I can't see United forcing anyone on ten Hag. He will have 100% say on his coaching staff.We are again doing best to do job half done. Why are we pushing our coaches in his coaching staff? Get rid of Fletcher, Phelan and others. Give him freedom to bring his complete coaching staff. We can protect ourseves with clauses in their contracts (when/if ETH is sacked all go with him). feck off already with "club soldiers"