Next permanent manager | Poll updated

Who should be the next permanent manager?

  • Luis Enrique

    Votes: 113 7.4%
  • Erik ten Hag

    Votes: 1,300 84.7%
  • Julen Lopetegui

    Votes: 10 0.7%
  • Mauricio Pochettino

    Votes: 79 5.1%
  • None of the above

    Votes: 32 2.1%

  • Total voters
    1,534
Status
Not open for further replies.
Does anyone here think Mancini is a better option then ten Hag and pochettino? Darren bent thinks so… ten Hag would still be my first choice but I’m unsure who id prefer over poch and Mancini.


Their is your problem
 
Yeah never listen to Talksport pundits for sensible advice because they can't provide it
I stopped listening completely a couple of weeks back, because it is more bothered about where they had dinner, where they went for a drink, what Darren Bent is wearing and proving how thick most of them are.
 
I stopped listening completely a couple of weeks back, because it is more bothered about where they had dinner, where they went for a drink, what Darren Bent is wearing and proving how thick most of them are.

Shame because was a decent station when it launched but now we have these regular joke callers and pundits to boot
 
Clearly Ralf and the fans want ETH. If we don't get ETH then it can only be because the Glazers didn't provide the kinds of reassurance he wanted on control of transfers. So ETH becomes an acid test of whether the Glazers are really serious about shifting to high press football with the intention of winning stuff. If it is more gas lighting then they will go for Poch - who is a perfectly good coach (as good as ETH) but we know he will accommodate the commercial stuff. Patchwork squads don't win anything.
 
Last edited:
It really needs no explanation but somehow some still can’t see it.

When Klopp was at Dortmund everybody was infatuated with the way the play, and by everybody I mean everyone who watches the Champions League. Some people doubted whether he could do it in the premier league, some called him a bottler since he lost some finals. But the evidence was there for all to see.

Now we have the same case with Ten Hag. genuinely great football at CL level, and league level although not one of the top leagues. And people are talking about no premier league experience when the top two coaches in the league had none.

Every appointment is a risk, this one is the more exciting, seemingly higher ceiling appointment. That’s why the absolute majority of supporters want it to happen.

With all due respect, Klopp was far more proven than ETH. It wasn't just in the CL. Klopp's Dortmund team remain the only team other than Bayern to win the Bundesliga in the last 11 (soon to be 12 years) and they did it twice in a row. The Bundesliga is also a far better league than the Eredivisie so the competition Klopp's Dortmund were facing on a regular basis was far higher. I'm happy with ETH, especially since I think it's already done and at this stage we might as well put all our full support behind him. That being said, the relative risk between ETH and Klopp is massively scewed towards ETH. The only reason it would even be remotely comparable is because of the way Klopp's time at Dortmund ended, which was probably the main reason we decided not to go for him at the time.
 
What does that mean? He’s excelling in the Chanpions League with a squad weaker than ours. And based on the matches I have watched, his Ajax team would finish top 4 in the premier league.

Sorry but this part is absolute nonsense. It would take a Leicester-sized miracle for that Ajax team to finish in the top 4 in the PL. That is nothing against ETH, the realtive standard of the Ajax players vs those in the PL is not high, in most cases mid-table with a couple potential stars like Gravenberch. The problem here is because nobody actually watches the Eredivisie, they have no idea how terribly poor the level of the Eredivisie actually is. The top 3 teams are probably mid level Prem standard, 4-5 probably relegation battling, 6-7 probably mid-table Championship, everything below is probably League 1 or lower. The gap between the top teams and the rest of the league is absolutley gigantic. This isn't just compared to the Premier League, Ligue 1 which people always criticise is a massively superior league, so much so that I would back any of the bottom 3 in Ligue 1 to beat 6th place Vitesse 8/10 times.
 
I think the whole thing needs to be toned down. This isn't a life or death decision. It's just the hiring of a manager. Everything about this is completely normal, there's nothing horrible or outrageous going on whatsoever. I get the point about the state of mind regarding the past but "this board" isn't this board anymore. New CEO, new DoF. Maybe just give it a rest for a moment and let them do their job.

Ay it.
 
Sorry but this part is absolute nonsense. It would take a Leicester-sized miracle for that Ajax team to finish in the top 4 in the PL. That is nothing against ETH, the realtive standard of the Ajax players vs those in the PL is not high, in most cases mid-table with a couple potential stars like Gravenberch. The problem here is because nobody actually watches the Eredivisie, they have no idea how terribly poor the level of the Eredivisie actually is. The top 3 teams are probably mid level Prem standard, 4-5 probably relegation battling, 6-7 probably mid-table Championship, everything below is probably League 1 or lower. The gap between the top teams and the rest of the league is absolutley gigantic. This isn't just compared to the Premier League, Ligue 1 which people always criticise is a massively superior league, so much so that I would back any of the bottom 3 in Ligue 1 to beat 6th place Vitesse 8/10 times.
Altidore was Eredivise's top scorer. Says a lot about the league.
 
I stopped listening completely a couple of weeks back, because it is more bothered about where they had dinner, where they went for a drink, what Darren Bent is wearing and proving how thick most of them are.


Benty talking shit on the daily.


Vardy was greatest finisher premier League ever seen, then they railed off all the amazing finishers the league has had, worse take ever.

He defo on the WUM as he knows that how you keep a job on that show triggering folk :lol:
 
Where are you getting your figures for Chelsea's net spend vs Spurs during Pochettino's time there? Also, how did Spurs spending compare to the the rest of the top 6 during that time?

Pochettino's time at Southampton was not merely decent. You're embarrassingly disingenuous in your portrayal of Pochettino. Also, many top managers have been fired and came back strong. If ETH hasn't faced failure you have to wonder how he bounces back from it
There you go

Bear in mind that Poch didn't have to replace his star players in the same time period. Unlike Chelsea who had to replace Drogba, Terry and Lampard.

And what exactly did he do at Soton? He finished 7th yet you laud it as if he qualified for the CL or won the PL. Good achievement, but Moyes finished 4th with Everton and is having the season of his life with West Ham. Should we rehire him maybe? :rolleyes:
 
It’s pretty clear you prefer poch as our future manager as I’ve read many of your pros for poch and cons for ETH
But I’m curious from your subjective and realistic point of you, what your thoughts are on pochs cons and ETH pros?

Pochettino's cons: 1. He hasn't won anything and there remains the question of whether he can get his teams over the line when it counts

2. It remains to be seen how he'll bounce back from the overall negative experiences of being fired at Spurs and (looking likely) PSG back to back. Even if he does walk away from PSG with a title his time there will be seen as failure by his harshest detractors and they're plenty. He'll have to win over fans who won't be willing to give him time going by the posts on here

Hag's pros: Has his teams playing flowing and attractive attacking football, seems to show a willingness to adapt to the club's ethos and identity (whatever that means these days for United, so that might not be a good thing haha).

If you've viewed my posting history as pertains to this discussion you'll already know I've made my views very clear and I've gone in depth. There's not much else for me to say
 
Yet a reporter from the Sun like Niel Custis is deemed favorable here simply because he's been reporting what the Hag supporters want to see.
He’s terrible and a City fan I believe. Got duped into writing an “exclusive” from a parody article then had to grovel afterwards.

https://www.football365.com/news/paul-pogba-bruno-fernandes-injuries-man-united-daily-mirror

Also


Custis at least regularly covers United and does get things right from time to time.
 
There you go

Bear in mind that Poch didn't have to replace his star players in the same time period. Unlike Chelsea who had to replace Drogba, Terry and Lampard.

And what exactly did he do at Soton? He finished 7th yet you laud it as if he qualified for the CL or won the PL. Good achievement, but Moyes finished 4th with Everton and is having the season of his life with West Ham. Should we rehire him maybe? :rolleyes:


You're clutching at straws. So you specifically named Chelsea as there's no other team in the big 6 you could point to to boost your case? You don't think this is bizarre? One thing I'll give Chelsea credit for is they know how to get great deals for their exiting stars.

He made Southampton play brilliant football and made them giant killers and European football chasers. Their final position in his first and only fill season with Southampton didn't reflect their entertainment value and quality of football, similar to West Ham under Moyes who have arguably played better football than Untied this season and sit behind us.

With Poch at the helm in their first season Southampton also beat City, Liverpool and Chelsea in the space of two months! They played fearless high intensity attacking football and took the game to their opponents no matter how big or small

Match report: Southampton 3-1 Manchester City 2012/13 February 9th

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/21311313

Match report: Southampton 3-1 Liverpool March 16 2013

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/mar/16/southampton-liverpool-premier-league

Match report: Southampton 2-1 Chelsea March 30 2013

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/21909243

Poch had an average player like Puncheon punching above his weight. Same with Ricky Lambert who scored 13 and made 10 assists in his first full season with Pochettino, earning him a move to Liverpool. Same with Morgan Schneirdelin who earned a France call up and move to United. Luke Shaw, Nathaniel Clyne, Jay Rodriguez, Adam Lallana, Wanyama, Dejan Lovren, Callum Chambers, Jose Fonte and James Ward-Prawse all shined under him
 
Last edited:
You're clutching at straws. So you specifically named Chelsea as there's no other team in the big 6 you could point to to boost your case? You don't think this is bizarre? One thing I'll give Chelsea credit for is they know how to get great deals for their exiting stars.

He made Southampton play brilliant football and made them giant killers and European football chasers. Their final position in his first and only fill season with Southampton didn't reflect their entertainment value and quality of football, similar to West Ham under Moyes who have arguably played better football than Untied this season and sit behind us.

With Poch at the helm in their first season Southampton also beat City, Liverpool and Chelsea in the space of two months! They played fearless high intensity attacking football and took the game to their opponents no matter how big or small

Match report: Southampton 3-1 Manchester City 2012/13 February 9th

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/21311313

Match report: Southampton 3-1 Liverpool March 16 2013

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/mar/16/southampton-liverpool-premier-league

Match report: Southampton 2-1 Chelsea March 30 2013

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/21909243

Poch had an average player like Puncheon punching above his weight. Same with Ricky Lambert who scored 13 and made 10 assists in his first full season with Pochettino, earning him a move to Liverpool. Same with Morgan Schneirdelin who earned a France call up and move to United. Luke Shaw, Nathaniel Clyne, Jay Rodriguez, Adam Lallana, Wanyama, Dejan Lovren, Callum Chambers, Jose Fonte and James Ward-Prawse all shined under him
All legit points but they were from nearly 10 years ago. The game may have passed him since then. That's a concern, too.
Mourinho and Ancelotti both looked immense 10 years ago. But now they are a shadow of their former selves.
 
I think the whole thing needs to be toned down. This isn't a life or death decision. It's just the hiring of a manager. Everything about this is completely normal, there's nothing horrible or outrageous going on whatsoever. I get the point about the state of mind regarding the past but "this board" isn't this board anymore. New CEO, new DoF. Maybe just give it a rest for a moment and let them do their job.

Finally a decent post.
 
All legit points but they were from nearly 10 years ago. The game may have passed him since then. That's a concern, too.
Mourinho and Ancelotti both looked immense 10 years ago. But now they are a shadow of their former selves.

The man downplayed what Pochettino acheived at Southampton and I responded with historical facts. Ancelloti is leading La Liga with Real by 11 points and he beat Pochettino's PSG to remain in the hunt for the CL in 2022. Which Ancelloti are you thinking of?
 
The man downplayed what Pochettino acheived at Southampton and I responded with historical facts. Ancelloti is leading La Liga with Real by 11 points and he beat Pochettino's PSG to remain in the hunt for the CL in 2022. Which Ancelloti are you thinking of?

To be fair he's probably just thinking of the one we all saw not so long ago at Everton.
 
Pochettino's work at Soton ans Spurs is being sold like that's the type of football his sides are serving these days. Sorry but that's not the case. He has evolved over the period of time just like other managers we have had. Everyone expected Jose to play the way his Madrid side or LvG the way his Ajax sides played. But nothing like that happened. Pochettino does not emphasize having a defined way of playing or identity thing and that's why I don't expect him to play the way his Soton side played like almost a decade ago. He wasn't serving anything special during his latter years at Spurs anyways. Yes, a great CL run but horrendous league form that lasted for half a season. So much for league proven and all.

Its time for a breath of fresh air and new ideas. Enough with these safer options that will lead us nowhere.
 

Rubbish. Because like any other big company, hiring and final offers take weeks. We only had an official interview last week according to sources. I'm guessing a couple more interviews might take place with the others. If he is indeed the man, an offer might be made first week of April at the earliest.

Also - I think ETH knows the process quite well, so I doubt he will be "shocked" at not getting an offer immediately after an interview.
 

Enrique and ten Hag are comfortably the best candidates as far as implementing a strong identity is concerned imo. And it's also not surprising to read that Ten Hag is more interested in developing the existing team with his ideas, rather than look to fix everything via the transfer window, which Northcroft is insinuating about the other candidates.

Northcroft: "Manchester United want their next manager to imbue the club with a strong playing identity, giving Erik ten Hag an early edge in the contest to take over at Old Trafford."

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...d-in-race-for-manchester-united-job-gf3wscw20
 
Yet a reporter from the Sun like Niel Custis is deemed favorable here simply because he's been reporting what the Hag supporters want to see.

No, it's because he's been oddly good for Utd news for years. Against all logic and what people expect, he has. Does it not get boring being just doom and gloom. Already trying to cause division and a split in the fanbase before a manager has even been hired. Twitter might be more the place for you.
 
You're clutching at straws. So you specifically named Chelsea as there's no other team in the big 6 you could point to to boost your case? You don't think this is bizarre? One thing I'll give Chelsea credit for is they know how to get great deals for their exiting stars.

He made Southampton play brilliant football and made them giant killers and European football chasers. Their final position in his first and only fill season with Southampton didn't reflect their entertainment value and quality of football, similar to West Ham under Moyes who have arguably played better football than Untied this season and sit behind us.

With Poch at the helm in their first season Southampton also beat City, Liverpool and Chelsea in the space of two months! They played fearless high intensity attacking football and took the game to their opponents no matter how big or small

Match report: Southampton 3-1 Manchester City 2012/13 February 9th

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/21311313

Match report: Southampton 3-1 Liverpool March 16 2013

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/mar/16/southampton-liverpool-premier-league

Match report: Southampton 2-1 Chelsea March 30 2013

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/21909243

Poch had an average player like Puncheon punching above his weight. Same with Ricky Lambert who scored 13 and made 10 assists in his first full season with Pochettino, earning him a move to Liverpool. Same with Morgan Schneirdelin who earned a France call up and move to United. Luke Shaw, Nathaniel Clyne, Jay Rodriguez, Adam Lallana, Wanyama, Dejan Lovren, Callum Chambers, Jose Fonte and James Ward-Prawse all shined under him
Clutching at straws :lol:

You have Chelsea who spent less and won 2 PL and a CL in the time Poch performed his "mirracles" at Spurs. Liverpool spent an astronimical 39 million more. But yeah, sure let's deflect from this fact by pointing at other teams.

You want to talk Poch's records against the big boys. Let's talk about this:


But let's put this to bed once and for all. All your achievements you can muster. Every single thing Poch did don't matter. You know why?

Because if were to replicate them at United he would be deemed a failure. Pure and simple.

Ole finished 2nd yet people were calling for his head. Mourinho got us 2 trophies and finished on our highest points since SAF retired and people are still calling him as a underachiever.

You can take his best stints at Soton and Spurs and translate them to United and tell you what: finishing consistently 3rd, trophyless every year isn't good enough for a club of our stature, pure and simple.
 
Enrique and ten Hag are comfortably the best candidates as far as implementing a strong identity is concerned imo. And it's also not surprising to read that Ten Hag is more interested in developing the existing team with his ideas, rather than look to fix everything via the transfer window, which Northcroft is insinuating about the other candidates.

Northcroft: "Manchester United want their next manager to imbue the club with a strong playing identity, giving Erik ten Hag an early edge in the contest to take over at Old Trafford."

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...d-in-race-for-manchester-united-job-gf3wscw20
So the tweet was wrong? It sounded ridiculous.
 
I'm all for the next manager working with the players we've got who are capable and up for it, but no matter who comes in there has to be a big turnover of players for them to stand a proper chance of suceeding, it'll just maybe slightly less with someone like ETH than some of our other recent managers would have asked for in this situation.

Only with the players that we can't stop leaving we need replacements, then you loads of others that will be gone withn 12 months, the club is just going to have to dig deep.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.