Gordon Godot
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,374
THis is crazy over analysis. The decisions were made by Woodward on the whole. Fergie chose Moyes as he thought he could mentor his clone and Glazers loved the idea of another manager who could do well on minimum spend. Then the board panicked and Woodward brought in LVG. He had no understanding of what LVG did or his football philosophy, but he was cheap and available. Then yes he panicked again and got Mourinho, a manger who by that point was clearly going downhill with shorter shelf lives. FInally Ole, he was meant to be a short fix but Woodward is so dumb he thought the Molde manager could challenge with teh big boys. We were never near competing.I think post SAF we've literally tried everything with managers. Have a look at our appointments since:
1. Moyes - picked by SAF which is why nobody questioned that decision. But he was clearly out of his depth at United. Never had the ability to challenge for trophies and titles, and manage big dressing rooms. By March we realised, "oops... we might have made a mistake" - reset please.
2. LvG - a different direction from Moyes. The idea was to have an experienced manager who can give stability to the club. But unfortunately, his ideas were old and he was incapable of adapting to the league. Bought and sold too many players - and thus breaking the spine of the team. This was when the culture started to change. By the 2nd year, this was a lost cause.
3. Mourinho - Screw philosophy lets get the proven winner. We thought, "Ok, so we messed up on the previous 2 appointments. Let's get the one who knows how to win". But Mourinho is Mourinho, and as well as he did in his 2nd season and winning the UEL in his 1st - he started spreading a lot of negativity. He was never going to be a long term appointment, we all knew that. The only difference is, he didn't win the league. By this time, the culture of United was ruined. The dressing room became toxic. "We messed up again didn't we?"
4. Ole - rewind. Get the old culture back. He stabilised the ship somewhat, but was always going to be challenged from a tactical point of view. Even till the end of last season, he was on the path to getting us back before it all went to shit. Had a lot of positives, but still wasn't THE ONE to get us back.
5. RR - very temporary and more like an SOS for the club. To steady the ship and fix problems at the core of the club. We've already messed way too many times.
Now, the reason for saying all this is that - we've already tried several options. We went with a British manager to repeat what SAF did, we went for the experienced hardman in Lvg, we went with the experienced proven winner in Mou, and we went with the club legend who understands the club. None of them worked. This is why Conte wouldn't have worked. This is exactly why I feel Poch might not work either.
We need something different. We need a shift in our strategy. We need the next Klopp or Pep or Tuchel. And there are only a handful of managers who are available and has that potential. ETH is at the top of that list.
So we havent actually tried 'options', we have had an idiot making incoherent and panicked decisions. The one thing we have not done, which all top teams now have is to build a strong and coherent football structure and get a manager to work in that. Then you avoid having the most bloated and dysfunctional squad in the premier league, and you may actualyl challenge.