Red Dreams
Full Member
All I know is the players should have no input in who comes. Recipe for disaster.
It should be a given.
But the Galzers want happy employees.
All I know is the players should have no input in who comes. Recipe for disaster.
All I know is the players should have no input in who comes. Recipe for disaster.
If Pochettino fails to win the Champions League, I think he will be sacked.
Already knocked out of the French Cup and winning the league, is hardly an accomplishment, with the money and players they have.
All I know is the players should have no input in who comes. Recipe for disaster.
Yes because you expected to win anything with spurs. spurs spend much more than United, Chelsea, arsenal, liverpool, city, etc. at psg, he already has a few cups in his name and about to comfortably walk the league. Something that champions league winner Tuchel couldn’t do and even was one of the basis for his sacking in his last season.Yep. Because if there’s anyone I want after a 10 year trophy drought it’s Mr Winner himself Spursy Pochettino
Yet Klopp went to the shit show that was Liverpool and turned it around.
We want a manager who would accept a challenge like United, to try to restore us to greatness.
Double that. Absolutely plonkers the lot of them if they think they can decide. Don't even talk to them. Anyone in the management who thinks so should be sacked on the spot.
Huh? How come? They are the ones playing on the pitch. If the players are willing to run through walls for a manager like Pochettino, it is better than downing tools over another manager they don't prefer. Even if we replace most of the players, it will cost a fortune and be near impossible to do especially after we have wasted so much in the last few season. Financially it won't make sense and even in term of performance it doesn't either because getting in different players will require time for them to build chemistry.All I know is the players should have no input in who comes. Recipe for disaster.
Huh? How come? They are the ones playing on the pitch. If the players are willing to run through walls for a manager like Pochettino, it is better than downing tools over another manager they don't prefer. Even if we replace most of the players, it will cost a fortune and be near impossible to do especially after we have wasted so much in the last few season. Financially it won't make sense and even in term of performance it doesn't either because getting in different players will require time for them to build chemistry.
You are absolutely right the fans are not happy and it's stupid but then when has that stopped United?But what's the purpose of this briefing? To prepare the atmospere for a Pochettino appointment?
Then apparently they have't taken the fans temperature about what they think about player power and the players in general, at the moment, because it's the kind of PR that can backfire, no?
Not to be a downer but Tuchel walked the league the season before he was sacked.Yes because you expected to win anything with spurs. spurs spend much more than United, Chelsea, arsenal, liverpool, city, etc. at psg, he already has a few cups in his name and about to comfortably walk the league. Something that champions league winner Tuchel couldn’t do and even was one of the basis for his sacking in his last season.
The player power dynamic will be hard to get rid of unless we change our transfer policies, in particular wage structure and identifyingthe ideal candidate for the club. Top club are typically filled with superstars, so there will always be that player power dynamic present unless the player has a great relationship with the manager and they are willing to adhere to his principles. As you stated, these players only hear what they heard about Pochettino and considering that footballer are typically closely associated with each other, it would make sense that many United player have heard positive news about Pochettino tactics from players that has played with them. It is better to have a happy atmosphere in the dressing room than a toxic one that we saw under mourinho and somewhat seeing under Ralf. In my opinion, the players should have a say, and their input should be heard from the board that includes the people who are in charge of football and also the financial aspect of Manchester unitedBecause it gives into to a squad already full of player power and also what do they know about how he manages? Apart from Shaw I don't think any of the squad have worked under him. They will only know things they've heard. They (and fans) aren't qualified to make a managerial decision. And unfortunately whilst they should be, I don't think our board is either.
Tuchel struggled in his last season, he definitely didnt walk that one. Tuchel expertise is definitely in cup competition as seen with Chelsea, so not surprised about that record.Not to be a downer but Tuchel walked the league the season before he was sacked.
He also has made the final in every single domestic cup he's been competing in since his time at PSG or something ridiculous like that. Might even include the CL as well.
He was widely known to have issues with that weirdo Leonardo and he didn't really struggle, PSG weren't in a much worse position than at the end of the league IIRC.Tuchel struggled in his last season, he definitely didnt walk that one. Tuchel expertise is definitely in cup competition as seen with Chelsea, so not surprised about that record.
No, they shouldn't be heard because it advocates for a bunch of individuals that we believe have character flaws, at least within the confines of a team being trusted with a responsibility of judgement that is far beyond their station. Basically, you want the lunatics running the asylum.The player power dynamic will be hard to get rid of unless we change our transfer policies, in particular wage structure and identifyingthe ideal candidate for the club. Top club are typically filled with superstars, so there will always be that player power dynamic present unless the player has a great relationship with the manager and they are willing to adhere to his principles. As you stated, these players only hear what they heard about Pochettino and considering that footballer are typically closely associated with each other, it would make sense that many United player have heard positive news about Pochettino tactics from players that has played with them. It is better to have a happy atmosphere in the dressing room than a toxic one that we saw under mourinho and somewhat seeing under Ralf. In my opinion, the players should have a say, and their input should be heard from the board that includes the people who are in charge of football and also the financial aspect of Manchester united
Yea as you noted, that lille team was good and reminded me of the leceister team. I believe they only lost three games that season, so perhaps that one season could be an outlier. Even then, stat showed that when pochettino took over, there was an improvement in their league form, he continued towards winning the domestic cup and almost made it to the champion league final. So as you noted the difference isnt that much, and seeing how well tuchel is doing at Chelsea well in terms of cup competition, it could be an indicator to why we are heavily interested in PochettinoHe was widely known to have issues with that weirdo Leonardo and he didn't really struggle, PSG weren't in a much worse position than at the end of the league IIRC.
That Lille team is also quite decent, so I am not sure why one season of average performances is that big of a deal.
In any case, Tuchel is definitely a cup manager but Pochettino has not really done that much better than him because they'll both walk the league in their first full season.
No, they shouldn't be heard because it advocates for a bunch of individuals that we believe have character flaws, at least within the confines of a team being trusted with a responsibility of judgement that is far beyond their station. Basically, you want the lunatics running the asylum.
Even if they're "happy" for a few months and "running through walls", players are fickle. That happiness can wain as soon as results turn, or the manager's disposition towards individuals turns.
It's not just about new manager bounce. It is about the most credible man available. The one who is tactically good enough, good enough in preparation, good enough with transfers, good enough to represent a massive club in all aspects of the job including with the media, stand out enough to turn a juggernaut around. If that is Pochettino he should be picked, but not because the players have a shallow conception of his ability based on hearsay. Baffling you'd even argue for it on such thin reasoning.
They have got the previous 4 sacked.I am baffled that you even argued against it as it is the players who perform on the pitch and team morale is a huge reason for a team to be successful. Their opinion shouldn't be the final say, but to say it shouldn't be considered is ridiculous.
They got the 4 previous sacked when team morale was down, i.e the manager has lost the dressing room which was noted on here many times. But when team morale was high we saw how brilliantly we performed. How can you perform well if their is a toxic atmosphere in the dressing room? And as noted we aren't getting rid of half of our players especially how wasteful we have been in the last few season so for anyone to even suggest that they are crazy. An important factor towards picking our next manager is that he will unite these current players and create a good atmosphere that will make them perform at the highlest level. The players wanting Pochettino is a good indicator of a unity that will be built.They have got the previous 4 sacked.
Only thing that is expected from them is performance. Next manager appointment is not their business. If they aren’t happy with next manager appointment they can find a new job. Its not like this lot is successful and the current manager is retiring. You dont ask least performing people for opinion. And this lot are the definition of that.
Would you expect the owner of the business you work for to ask for recommendations on who should manage you and your colleagues?I am baffled that you even argued against it as it is the players who perform on the pitch and team morale is a huge reason for a team to be successful. Their opinion shouldn't be the final say, but to say it shouldn't be considered is ridiculous.
Actually I made that experience, that team members are included in interviews with potential team leads. Just to check if the chemistry is right between team and manager. So yes, this is not unusual in some companies.Would you expect the owner of the business you work for to ask for recommendations on who should manage you and your colleagues?
How did it work out?Actually I made that experience, that team members are included in interviews with potential team leads. Just to check if the chemistry is right between team and manager. So yes, this is not unusual in some companies.
OK I get it about Ten Hag but to my eyes Poch is the right fit.
Unfortunately Ten Hag will come and be a huge flop, and we will be here again and debate about that he needs time to implement his ideas, we're missing x,y,z player blah blah.
A lot of people are taking the PL know how (that Poch has) a bit light.
It makes a huge difference coming from the Dutch league or the Bundesliga to the PL and a lot of players and managers learned it the hard way.
Ten Hag coming to the PL will be like Ole when he came from Norway. The Dutch league is a two team league with almost inexistent defending. That's why almost every year the top scorer will be a has been player, or flopped in the PL player etc.
At this moment the top scorer is Sébastien Haller who couldn't nail a place in the starting 11 of West Ham, and 4th top scorer is Ricky van Wolfswinkel.
I really can't wrap my head around the idea that people are dismissing what Poch did with Spurs and praise what Ten Hag does with Ajax.
Don't know. I didn't get that jobHow did it work out?
Can't see it working too well at United, as others have mentioned, they've seen the back of 4 other managers previously and it'd lead to a catastrophic failure should we listen to them this time.
If he flops, he flops. At least we can be happy we tried and it didn't work out. With Poch it's going to be more or less the same, thus admitting defeat. I rather risk it and go for greatness rather than wallow in misery.
You mean like that dude who has a relegation on his CV and ended up as Liverpool manager?
If poch's biggest attribute is PL know-how then we ought to hire Roy hodgson.
Oh hope you got the next one!Don't know. I didn't get that job
I did, but not on management level. Nonetheless got the same money, so I guess I'm luckyOh hope you got the next one!