Moby
Dick
What? Cannot have random allocation in a draft where you are specifically asked to build a flawless tactical unit.Maybe get a GOAT pool and randomly allocate at R6.
What? Cannot have random allocation in a draft where you are specifically asked to build a flawless tactical unit.Maybe get a GOAT pool and randomly allocate at R6.
There wont be GOATs(Messi, Diego, Pele, Kaiser etc.), every manager will get a great player but that great player wont be a first tier great and you will get that player before we start picking so you know around who you are building your side.
Have to finish the rules but will post them in few minutes so everyone can see if they are ok with it.
second tier
This is why nobody likes Russians.Gullit
That's a good call since some GOAT's are better than others especially in 16 managers pool.
Same goes for Rivellino tbh. Still, I think we discussed quite recently Gullit's case (with EAP/Annah/Joga don't really remember) - how many teams can you remember where Gullit was the star man?This is why nobody likes Russians.
I don't about stars but each of those great teams would have won sweet feckall without him.how many teams can you remember where Gullit was the star man?
And that needs to change, absolute rubbish. As far as his contribution to the team goes it's technical offensive brilliance (dribbling, control at pace, vision, link up play, goalscoring), physicality and then work rate. He didn't win the Ballon D'or in THAT era because he was able to cover more ground than others!He's usually picked here as a hardworking all-rounder that can balance the GOAT-ish attack.
I meant draft teams, not Milan/Netherlands. And he definitely deserves much more recognition for what he had doneI don't about stars but each of those great teams would have won sweet feckall without him.
You're welcome.Special mention to @Joga Bonito from who i shamefully stole this template.
You're welcome.
As far as I am understanding these rules, I think for Reinforcements you need to Block the first round picks so basically every team has an absolute maximum of one Top 3 Ballon/SAfoty and that's it.
Draft Committee - Šjor Bepo, Antohan, Physiocrat, Balu
So it should be. Although maybe some of the players from the original top-3 should be included? The ones that are never getting picked - like Keegan/Simonsen/Belanov?btw block list will be bigger then just top 3 spots from balon dor list
Open to joining the committee if there's room for more.
So it should be. Although maybe some of the players from the original top-3 should be included? The ones that are never getting picked - like Keegan/Simonsen/Belanov?
You should play - it's the best kind of draft for the famous "Joga Bonito PR machine"Open to joining the committee if there's room for more.
Teams will be built and judged for best tactical fits rather then the quality of the team. First, team has to be perfectly built around the central figure and only after that we will look at the other specific pairings, good fits for the team etc.
Draft matches would be decided based on who has crafted/built the more coherent and cohesive tactical set-up around his main star as opposed to who might win in a fantasy encounter.
there is always room but the committee pretty much already did their job, all lists are ready + funny you asked for a spot as we put one player specially for you in the pool, thats the best we can do, now its up to the lady luck if you decide to play and i hope you do.
And @Šjor Bepo I can't see the dip pool picture. Can you do a list?
I don't think this should be specified as a rule. If the pool is tailored enough with blocks the star power will be taken out of the equation by default. The rule definition is very ambiguous. How about an attack that perfectly fits Rivellino but a bad CB pairing? This is just game dynamics and should be left to the discretion of the manager/voters.
So it should be. Although maybe some of the players from the original top-3 should be included? The ones that are never getting picked - like Keegan/Simonsen/Belanov?
Agree with it, otherwise it would be like Remake draft. As you would just pick the best team with your man (e.g. Brazil 70 for Rivellino) and try to replicate it. Think usual draft matches would be better where you can use your allocated player in creative ways to counter other team.I don't think this should be specified as a rule. If the pool is tailored enough with blocks the star power will be taken out of the equation by default. The rule definition is very ambiguous. How about an attack that perfectly fits Rivellino but a bad CB pairing? This is just game dynamics and should be left to the discretion of the manager/voters.
You should try yourself as an adult movie screenwriterSpirit of the draft: 'The beauty and the 10 Beasts'
You should try yourself as an adult movie screenwriter
Agree with it, otherwise it would be like Remake draft. As you would just pick the best team with your man (e.g. Brazil 70 for Rivellino) and try to replicate it. Think usual draft matches would be better where you can use your allocated player in creative ways to counter other team.
I get it that they wouldn't be tier 1 goats around whom the team will be built but we need to keep some sort of interest.Belanov'86 should be a first round handout IMO.
You should try yourself as an adult movie screenwriter
Already said that the block list is pretty big so the answer is yes.@Šjor Bepo
Starting point: you choose the list of blocked players (the question is: do you want to see a lot of new faces or not?)
Next: who are the 16 main stars?
---> I'd like a preliminary stage for the 1st player - sheep mode - so that we can potentially choose our 'main star' depending the criteria or the list of main stars you submit
I get it that they wouldn't be tier 1 goats around whom the team will be built but we need to keep some sort of interest.
I'm not sure what differentiates this from Remake draft. Isn't this just a remake draft but with a player instead of a manager?
The only cases I can see it being non-remake would be for earlier players that played in a WM or 2-3-5 where the best tactical fit would be a modern formation.
Managers can use any formations and tactics in their efforts to create the perfect scene for their main star. For example, if you get Pele from 1970 WC you are not obliged to create the same tactic or a formation in which he played there.
You should try yourself as an adult movie screenwriter
Do you feel personally targeted by this rule?