GodShaveTheQueen
We mean it man, we love our queen!
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2018
- Messages
- 6,680
Yeah, it is hard to find if you don't know it exists. The best you get is having the draft post as the latest post in the forum list page
Exactly
Yeah, it is hard to find if you don't know it exists. The best you get is having the draft post as the latest post in the forum list page
We are not in vacuum you know.
There is shortage of posts in general and not related to this. We are fine.
Are they down just since coronavrius stopped the football calendar or has there been a general drop relative to previous seasons? I don't venture much outside the draft forums so don't know
It's been down since we lost tuppet. But, we managed to keep a flat curve imo.
How about including a "draw" option in the match polls?
Bigger advantage: If you have voted and change your mind, you can not only switch to the opposition, but also to a draw. Which is more likely than a total 180. (I had that problem in the past.)
Smaller advantage: Neutrals who think it's a draw don't appear as absent, but their vote is a) explicit, and b) contributes to the overall turnout.
Can't see any downside.
Ah, pity.We tried that a while ago and the general view was it just encouraged voters not to make a decision and take the easy option of a draw
The drafting was fine but the matches were pretty shit and with little activity. Wasn't easy to simulate a match in a thread. But if you are doing one then count me in.would anyone be up for a NBA draft? think i saw a draft long time ago and IIRC @Moby was playing? If so, was it good and how many players would we even need?
Would go next to a football one.
would anyone be up for a NBA draft? think i saw a draft long time ago and IIRC @Moby was playing? If so, was it good and how many players would we even need?
Would go next to a football one.
Please invite and accept me for the NBA draft.would anyone be up for a NBA draft? think i saw a draft long time ago and IIRC
Don't think he's been online for a while mate, i say you go ahead and throw up the thread for yours and get the sign ups going.@Indnyc are you going ahead with Monopoly Draft? Just asking cause I’ve been working on a board as well. The challenge is getting the financial balance right at the moment.
it’s not ready yet though and may not be for a while yet. So if yours is ready to go you can go ahead.
Don't think he's been online for a while mate, i say you go ahead and throw up the thread for yours and get the sign ups going.
This one?Yeah, ok. I'll get on it. Mine is a bit different anyway as it involves clubs. I've still got a bit of work to do to get it right. In the meantime, if anyone else has an idea we can simply go ahead with that.
This one?
Ha!@Synco there is your chance
2. All Time Great Managers Draft
Every player picks a manager and builds a side around his basic philosophy & historical setups. So there may be knockout games of SAF vs Herrera, Cruijff vs Mourinho, Happel vs Conte. An option is keeping manager choices secret during the drafting process.
Okay, if we're just firing away with suggestions, here's mine again:
- tactics must be true to the manager's philosophy, but can be tweaked within that frame
- amount of players that have played under that manager is limited (3-5 probably)
Yeah it was an oversight in the Remake Draft that we were allowed to use players from the teams who were trying to replicate. So remove completely would resolve that. It does add in a new factor though that ruling out all of Trapattoni's players for example make it more challenging to build a team than doing the same for Ferguson, Busby or Sacchi for example.id remove them completely
Thought about that too. Would make a few manager choices more difficult than others.id remove them completely
Okay, if we're just firing away with suggestions, here's mine again:
- tactics must be true to the manager's philosophy, but can be tweaked within that frame
- amount of players that have played under that manager is limited (3-5 probably)
No problem mate, go for it.Seems like this could work, so I'd like to give it a try & see if we can get 16 to play. Details can still be ironed out over the next few days.
@2mufc0
Are you okay with delaying your draft idea a bit? I'm kind of itching to get more involved than just making everyone's life miserable in draft matches. I'd play in this one myself, so it'd be payback time and everyone can finally kick my ass as well.
Okay, if we're just firing away with suggestions, here's mine again:
- tactics must be true to the manager's philosophy, but can be tweaked within that frame
- amount of players that have played under that manager is limited (3-5 probably)
Definitely no manager's players allowed.id remove them completely
Would be funny (Mou vs Mou), but I'd prefer if not. More variety in styles that way, and probably more outlier choices.Definitely no manager's players allowed.
The only issue/question is, can managers be picked twice?
This would be my preference as well. It's just when we had the Managers draft is suddenly came as a surprise to me that one manager could've been picked twiceWould be funny (Mou vs Mou), but I'd prefer if not. More variety in styles that way, and probably more outlier choices.
Don't like randomization that much, it also prevents more original choices. I have an idea for a sheep style manager pick (but with lottery draws instead of blocks). Result should be that everyone can pick a manager they like, but we still end up with 16 different ones.Maybe pick 16 managers and just randomise, will be boring if everyone just picks the same managers.