prtk0811
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2016
- Messages
- 7,854
This is shaping up to be an extremely underwhelming summer by all accounts in terms of incoming transfers.
Nah, it will be fine.
This is shaping up to be an extremely underwhelming summer by all accounts in terms of incoming transfers.
how old is bakayoko? 24/25? they'll get more than 4 good years out of him.agree, but for the quoted £40m it's a lot seeing as that's what Bakayoko is arguably going for and they'll get a good 4 more years out of him. But at going rates, what's £40m right.
This forum is never happier than when saying someone is declining.
Obsessed!
I'm not actually sure it's true with Matic. His role has changed from 2 years ago to last year's version, and no Chelsea player came out well from the dreadful title defence year
This is shaping up to be an extremely underwhelming summer by all accounts in terms of incoming transfers.
Not really. Summer is considered successful or a failure by seeing players on the pitch, not by signing the players only.
This is shaping up to be an extremely underwhelming summer by all accounts in terms of incoming transfers.
how old is bakayoko? 24/25? they'll get more than 4 good years out of him.
Well if dont have the luxury of taking a risk, then lets not buy anyone foreign player. Lets stick to the premier league cause only those players are "premier league proven".For Jose, Fabinho is a much bigger risk. If he struggles (and let's be honest, that's a big possibility), we're back to a midfield three of Herrera, pogba and Fellaini. Although Fabinho may have a greater ceiling, mourinho knows exactly what's he's getting with Matic. There's much less risk that he won't displace Fellaini. Right now, that's what we probably need - we don't really have the luxury of taking a risk.
I simply cannot believe that fee for a guy who's almost 30 years old, with no other suitors in sight. Seriously? That can't be right. Are you telling me the guys who run our club and make so much money, hasn't got a proper negotiator among them? Also, we're playing hardball on the fee for Perisic, but yet we're going to pay more for another old player and Chelsea cast off? Why are we giving in so easily here? I'd be surprised if this worked out.
I guess all his ass kissing of Mourinho through the media has worked it's charm
I also hope we're not planning on giving him a long contract at his age.
Going forward, United need to get a Director of Football and hire better scouts.
Of course you need a mixture of mature players and young ones BUT - not a semi declining old player who costs £40M - that's bad business.Do you want a team of 21 year olds who have no experience of a title run in and could potentially bottle it every year? You'd swear he's verging on chronic arthritis. Fair enough if we consistently sign players who are 30+ years of age but I just don't understand the hysteria with his age. You need a mix and we have plenty of young players. Signing a midfielder who is 28 going on 29 who has experiencing of playing and winning the premier league isn't a bad thing.
If we're really about to spend a large chunk of our summer budget on a lumbering Matic, clearly past his best and probably Chelsea's worst regular player last season, I'm not very optimistic for this season.Forgetting age for a minute, I just find it hard to believe this is the best we could do for what we're willing to pay.
Do you want a team of 21 year olds who have no experience of a title run in and could potentially bottle it every year? You'd swear he's verging on chronic arthritis. Fair enough if we consistently sign players who are 30+ years of age but I just don't understand the hysteria with his age. You need a mix and we have plenty of young players. Signing a midfielder who is 28 going on 29 who has experiencing of playing and winning the premier league isn't a bad thing.
Forgetting age for a minute, I just find it hard to believe this is the best we could do for what we're willing to pay.
Pep is going to sign a 35 years old RB but it's not a problem at all, however when we sign a 29 years old player then we're going for short term and the team will be ruined in 2-3 years. Interesting.
Yep signing for free and spending 40m is the exact same thing.Pep is going to sign a 35 years old RB but it's not a problem at all, however when we sign a 29 years old player then we're going for short term and the team will be ruined in 2-3 years. Interesting.
If we're really about to spend a large chunk of our summer budget on a lumbering Matic, clearly past his best and probably Chelsea's worst regular player last season, I'm not very optimistic for this season.
Aren't they signing Dani Alves on a free? I'd take Matic for free...
Because Lindelof has time on his side. Matic doesnt.Is the problem in the fee now ? 35-40m is the ordinary price for any ordinary player in the current market. We signed Lindelof for 30m and he's considered cheap.
Yep signing for free and spending 40m is the exact same thing.
If we're really about to spend a large chunk of our summer budget on a lumbering Matic, clearly past his best and probably Chelsea's worst regular player last season, I'm not very optimistic for this season.
Because Lindelof has time on his side. Matic doesnt.
Again its cheap maybe for a player like Fabinho has the potential to develop into an even better player. Its different with Matic. He has already peaked and is declining. No improvement here.As if 40m isn't cheap in the current market actually.
Isn't it strange that the complains here about any player are always about the price or the age ?
Dafaq? When did I say Lindelof is expensive? Im very happy with that signing.So you consider Lindelof an expensive signing ?
30m is the least you can pay for any ordinary player now. Deal with it.
Again its cheap maybe for a player like Fabinho has the potential to develop into an even better player. Its different with Matic. He has already peaked and is declining. No improvement here.
If we HAVE to spend 40m to get Matic, then we dont need him.What was you expecting us to pay for him ? 15-20m ? This is just not gonna happen.
Dafaq? When did I say Lindelof is expensive? Im very happy with that signing.
Its not high.You said paying 30m for him is good because he has time to develop, so you consider this price high or not ? Don't get you.