Nemanja Matic| BBC says deal agreed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not that I agree with the idea that Magic is a better goalscorer than Fellaini particularly but you'd have to factor in the fact that Fellaini played up front for Everton at times and how often in his career he's thrown on just to mill about the box. Those stats for Fellaini are fairly shit when that is considered.

I'am not saying Fellaini is good, I'am just saying Matic surely isn't better offensively. Defensively, it is another story.
 
You can say that but these are facts:

Fellaini:
84 games for Standard, scored 12 goals and provided 6 assists
177 games for Everton, scored 33 goals and provided 26 assists
133 games for United, scored 15 goals and provided 9 assists
77 caps for Belgium, scored 16 goals

Total: 471 games, 76 goals and 41 assists

Average per game is: 0.16 goals and 0.09 assists



Matic:
29 games for Vitesse, scored 2 goals and provided 3 assists
56 games for VSS Kosice, scored 3 goals and provided 2 assists
97 games for Benfica, scored 9 goals and provided 1 assists
154 games for Chelsea, scored 7 goals and provided 20 assists
31 caps for Serbia, scored 1 goal

Total: 367 games, 22 goals and 26 assists

Average per game is: 0.06 goals and 0.07 assists

But keep pretending Matic is far superior to Fellaini in offence. The career stats tell a totally different story but who cares about facts right ?

That's because he is usually played as no 10 while Matic is played as DM. Throughout his career in the EPL Roy Keane scored just 39 goals and had 33 assists. Only a mad man would consider Chest/elbow expert Fellaini better offensively then Roy Keane

https://www.premierleague.com/players/407/Roy-Keane/stats
 
Not sure what to make of this transfer. I kind of agree with the principle that if Chelsea are selling to upgrade maybe we should consider the upgrade, but you could also argue they need that upgrade and might spend more for it and we don't. Or the 'upgrade' is more of a different option as they already have Kante to do much of what Matic would do.

£40m for what will be a 29 year old sounds a lot, i.e £10m a year till the end of being 33, which is generally considered the point at which you hit bonus world, rather than banking that as part of the investment.

Still in this financial climate who knows what is good value. And there are intangible values such as very recent Premiership winning experience, an inside view of Chelsea, etc. Some of these insights may be worth way more than £40m alone.

Winners in the dressing room is always a big plus.

Then there is the fact journalist's may not even have a clue and it's all nonsense anyway.

So as with all things football, all we really need to care about is what our squad is come the end of the summer.

Carrick has always been effective and not glamorous so why not have a job share and then take over who is more of the same!
 
Marginally more mobile than a 36 year old Carrick.
Do not want.
 
I don't particularly rate Dier, but I'd much prefer him over Matic.

We are being linked with some extremely underwhelming players this summer that look like good quality squad players rather than bonafide starters that will transform us.
 
Nemanja Matic - if we signed him he would make us better. He is better than what we already have, that is for certain. Carrick was great for a few games last season, but we are talking 10 games - not 35 - and he was obviously tired and showing his age at the end. The less we play Lingard and Fellaini, the better our results will be. However, like I have mentioned in the past, Matic is getting on and who knows how hungry he is? I am not saying he is old, but if we are going to fork out 50M I want a player for now and for the future like Fabinho.

Matic would be OK, but underwhelming - we need BETTER players to become a Champions League-team/winner. Thus far we have gotten Lindelof and perhaps Perisic will come in next, these are not even close to being of the highest quality. They are Newcastle-signings to be honest. Does not mean they are bad, but we seriously need quality to go up a few levels.
 
Would prefer Fabinho and Semedo, or Matic and Semedo - basically, I'd like a central midfielder and a rightback - not Fabinho being played out of position. From what I've seen I prefer Fabinho to Matic, but I'm pretty sure Mourinho and his team have a better idea than I do so I'll happily accept whichever midfielder they believe to be right for us
Out of position? The guy has played there for the most of his career, now he's out of position if he plays right-back? You people…
 
Two Chelsea fans in my office have been laughing their arses off at me this morning.

Both think he's average and think we are crazy to spend £40 million on him.
 
Two Chelsea fans in my office have been laughing their arses off at me this morning.

Both think he's average and think we are crazy to spend £40 million on him.

Well tell them united fans make their perceptions on players based on their own judgements.:D
 
Pogba and Herrera are CM not AM. They are not great for attacking.

Pogba is great for attacking. Seems you haven't been watching us. Pogba would have 15 assists or more had Ibra and others decided to put away some of his final balls.
 
The best players for a team are not always the best players.

IF, and it's a big IF, Jose thinks Matic and Perisic will best execute his title winning plans, then Matic and Perisic might just be the best players to get. If Jose gets it wrong, then his reputation takes a hit and he'll probably end up getting fired someday.
 
So Chelsea get Bakayako for £35m & we pay £40mfor Matic....makes sense!
 
Matic will surprise a lot of people if he does sign. He's very good on the ball for someone who is 194cm in height. Has very good vision. A good pass on him. He reads the game well and is a very good tackler. Honestly, he will be a cracking player for us!
 
I would take him but we still need Fabhinio. Having both Matic and Fabhinio would be very good for us.
 
Matic is a two time Premier League winner and a very good defensive midfielder, I don't understand why so many would be against us moving for him. It may not be an 'exotic' signing but we know he won't need to adjust to the Premier League, and he has been good enough to help Chelsea win the title twice. If Chelsea are open to selling I'm open to us buying.
 
So Chelsea get Bakayako for £35m & we pay £40mfor Matic....makes sense!

If we have been the ones signing Bakayako, I can see this forum meltdown and moaning about him also. Basically it's just Fabinho or no one else for many here.
 
Two Chelsea fans in my office have been laughing their arses off at me this morning.

Both think he's average and think we are crazy to spend £40 million on him.


Matic is not an average player at all considering his career overall. He is really good. But the reality is that he had an average season (by his high standards) the last time and during Jose's last season at Chelsea. The question is can he get back to his best? If he does, then United would have hit a jackpot. If he does not, then it could be disastrous as the DM position might remain a problem area.

If Jose desperately wants him, then it means he's willing to bet on Matic getting back to his best under his management. That's risky but then, it's what makes football tick.
 
So chelsea will buy better player and give us their sub. Wtf? What are we stoke or wba?
Bakayoko is far better player then matic. So why don't go straight for bakayoko?
 
If we have been the ones signing Bakayako, I can see this forum meltdown and moaning about him also. Basically it's just Fabinho or no one else for many here.

Not sure. Many have convinced themselves Bakayoko is a defensive midfielder, ignoring the fact Fabinho is the anchor of the Monaco midfield with Bakayoko hunting the ball higher up the pitch. :rolleyes:

I don't mind whether we sign Matic or Fabinho. They are both very good holding players. I find it odd that people are trying to pretend Matic is average though.
 
IMO

Chelsea play 3 at the back, so swapping a pure sitting midfield for a box to box midfielder in bakayoko makes sense

So - just because chelsea are 'swapping them' doesn't mean they play the same position.

Mourinho plays a back 4 so needs a more defensive option that Bakayoko, who simply hasn't been a holding mid this year (as matic is)
 
Not sure. Many have convinced themselves Bakayoko is a defensive midfielder, ignoring the fact Fabinho is the anchor of the Monaco midfield with Bakayoko hunting the ball higher up the pitch. :rolleyes:

I don't mind whether we sign Matic or Fabinho. They are both very good holding players. I find it odd that people are trying to pretend Matic is average though.

Hmm do you mean Bakayoko is more like Kante-esque ? moving and pressing everywhere, not setting at the back ?

And yep I agree it's annoying, Matic after all was a key part in the team who won the league twice in 3 seasons. He's not the best in the world but he can't be THAT bad. He has been shite in Jose's last season but same goes for all Chelsea players even Hazard it's not a point to prove something.
 
So chelsea will buy better player and give us their sub. Wtf? What are we stoke or wba?
Bakayoko is far better player then matic. So why don't go straight for bakayoko?

Because Bakayoko is a different type of player to Matic, with the Matic type presumably being what Mourinho is looking for.
 
Hmm do you mean Bakayoko is more like Kante-esque ? moving and pressing everywhere, not setting at the back ?

And yep I agree it's annoying, Matic after all was a key part in the team who won the league twice in 3 seasons. He's not the best in the world but he can't be THAT bad. He has been shite in Jose's last season but same goes for all Chelsea players even Hazard it's not a point to prove something.

More or less. Bakayoko is not a defensive midfielder. Fabinho is Monaco's holding player. When Fabinho was out for the City games and Bakayoko was forced to play as the defensive midfielder you could see its not his natural game.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.