ZDwyr
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2014
- Messages
- 7,318
The inability to grab a rebound in the last few minutes will haunt Memphis.
You do get ejected for having 2 flagrant fouls.Is that an actual thing or did you just make it up
Officially no, but unofficially the refs calls it differently depending on the player.Noob to this basketball stuff….does the travelling rule change when you’re near the basket?
You do get ejected for having 2 flagrant fouls.
I am asking if you ever see them throwing anyone out because they thought that there were two fragrants in the same play
Yes, they'll just call it as a flagrant 2 which is an instant ejection.I am asking if you ever see them throwing anyone out because they thought that there were two fragrants in the same play
What a bullshit call, but hardly surprising considering how shit officiating is in NBA. Then again, you think this is playoffs, so it might be different and tbf they let basketball being played in some recent games (like the game before this one for example).
Great win for the Warriors, well deserved.
The league does a lot of bullshit calls but they're pretty consistent with intentional contact above the neck.I think according to the rules the ejection was fine. The issue is, that I don’t think other players would have had the rulebook thrown at them like Green did.
He got tossed because he's a dumbass and went for the head.Draymond got tossed because he is Draymond Green. No other explanation for that. He gets leeway sometimes because of that but then for things like this the reputation will always be a factor. This is a man who once missed a championship game because of absolutely nothing
He got tossed because he's a dumbass and went for the head.
He's a fecking idiot who got what he deserved.
Jason Kidd catching bodies
He's not wrong though. Ayton by far the biggest matchup problem for the Mavs in this series. They need Brunson/someone to have another series like the Jazz, and maybe invest in some VR tech to make Luka think he's playing the Clippers
Timing.Apparently Gobert wants either him or Mitchell traded.
Think the Jazz will find it hard to move Mitchell on.
Timing.
I think the opposite. Teams will not offer much for Gobert while I can see some offering a lot for Mitchell. I would expect Knicks to jump in with a big offer immediately.
Same. Jazz are seemingly desperate to keep Mitchell - despite Gobert currently being both better and more important to their team - but i think once they start exploring the market it will be Mitchell they trade. Think he has a much higher value on the market as more teams need a player like him and his type tends to attract bigger offers than defensive anchors with limited offensive skillsetsTiming.
I think the opposite. Teams will not offer much for Gobert while I can see some offering a lot for Mitchell. I would expect Knicks to jump in with a big offer immediately.
Aren't you a grizzlies fan???What??? I would kill right now to have Gobert. So would a couple of other teams who have better perimeter defenders than Utah.
I’m not saying he’s not a very good player but between him being 30 this year, earning an average of more than $41m per year for the next 4 seasons, cumulating in $46.7m annual salary in 2025-26 when he will be 33, and him being very limited on offense and not necessarily always matching up well with other centers, I do not see the value being extremely high. I mean I don’t see anyone trade good young pieces + picks for him while teams will easily offer that for Mitchell who’s just a way more flashy player, on a slightly better contract and much younger.What??? I would kill right now to have Gobert. So would a couple of other teams who have better perimeter defenders than Utah.
Doubt it. Most teams already have a score first guard and adding Mitchell isn't going to be as big an upgrade over what most teams would have already.Timing.
I think the opposite. Teams will not offer much for Gobert while I can see some offering a lot for Mitchell. I would expect Knicks to jump in with a big offer immediately.
Imagine a healthy Clippers with Gobert. They're going to keep teams below 100 every game.What??? I would kill right now to have Gobert. So would a couple of other teams who have better perimeter defenders than Utah.
Problem is you can't build a contender around a defensive sieve like Mitchell either.Between Gobert & Mitchell it’s a no brainer for Utah in terms of who to keep. You can’t build around Gobert in this current nba
Problem is you can't build a contender around a defensive sieve like Mitchell either.
I think you can if he's an unholy sun devourer on offenceProblem is you can't build a contender around a defensive sieve like Mitchell either.
I was a little surprised when Draymond was thrown out, I expected a flagrant 1 to be called. However, I didn't think the call was outrageous or ridiculous as some in the media have made out. What I thought was far more egregious was the jump ball the refs called after Klay Thompson had missed the FTs. That was just bad refereeing when not one of the three had the balls/eyesight to make the correct call.
Aren't you a grizzlies fan???
I’m not saying he’s not a very good player but between him being 30 this year, earning an average of more than $41m per year for the next 4 seasons, cumulating in $46.7m annual salary in 2025-26 when he will be 33, and him being very limited on offense and not necessarily always matching up well with other centers, I do not see the value being extremely high. I mean I don’t see anyone trade good young pieces + picks for him while teams will easily offer that for Mitchell who’s just a way more flashy player, on a slightly better contract and much younger.
Warriors could be an interesting fit but this comes down to what I mentioned before, what would they realistically offer for him? Maybe Wiggins, a salary filler and a future first that would probably end up in the 20s. That is not a big offer. Maybe one of their young players but none of them have really done that much since coming into the league (Wiseman, Kuminga, Moody).His contract is a bit hefty, granted.
If you're near contenders with a mediocre center he pushes you over the top. The Warriors for example don't need him to create offense. And he's an upgrade on Wiseman, Looney, whoever else they trot out at center...
If you are the Knicks you probably go for Mitchell. He won't win you a chip but he's more box office.
Gobert, Kawhi and George on defense would be the best defense in the league.Imagine a healthy Clippers with Gobert. They're going to keep teams below 100 every game.
Id take Gobert in a heart beat. I wouldn't drive to SF 'cause it's too far. I'd try and get @Charlie Foley to do it. He's closer.Yes.
I would drive to Memphis, drive Steven Adams + Dillon Brooks to Salt Lake City, then pick up Gobert and drive him back to Memphis. No stops along the way.
We are talking about a 3 time DPOY here for goodness sakes. I don't want him chasing guards on the perimeter. I want him protecting the rim and catching lobs from Ja.
Jazz ain't giving you Gobert for Brooks and Adams though. You'd have to at least throw Clarke in there, or maybe JJJ if not Bane. Would you give up that much for Gobert? Considering how good your defence already is? Just get JJJ to figure out how to stop fouling and you've already got a DPOTY on the team. One that isn't limited on offence eitherYes.
I would drive to Memphis, drive Steven Adams + Dillon Brooks to Salt Lake City, then pick up Gobert and drive him back to Memphis. No stops along the way.
We are talking about a 3 time DPOY here for goodness sakes. I don't want him chasing guards on the perimeter. I want him protecting the rim and catching lobs from Ja.
Brother I live on the east coast these days, I’m surely further than you areId take Gobert in a heart beat. I wouldn't drive to SF 'cause it's too far. I'd try and get @Charlie Foley to do it. He's closer.