All I know is that KD is a hell of a basketball player, up there with the very best if not the best. Him playing for a very talented team doesn't take away from that. Just means like Bron he was afraid of the challenge and got desperate for titles.
Turned out well for him only if you look at rings as the main/only accomplishment an NBA player can get.Well can you blame him? It's the ultimate achievement and it turned out well for him, rather to be nearly man...
he got the finals MVP though, so essentially the best player of his teamTurned out well for him only if you look at rings as the main/only accomplishment an NBA player can get.
He was the main player on the team that blew a 3-1 lead against the Warriors. There's no reason to suggest that he couldn't have won a ring with the Thunder but he chickened out and opted for the easy way, which will forever tarnish his legacy unless he goes to another team this summer and wins another ring there (which is what LeBron did, against the best regular season team of all time).
Wasn't necessarily comparing him to LeBron as I agree that he'll never be regarded higher than him, which is no shame because LeBron is a shoe-in for top 5 all-time imo. Durant will always have it hanging over his head that he joined the Warriors, people will keep using it as a stick to beat him with if a "top 10 of all-time" debate comes up or anything like that.he got the finals MVP though, so essentially the best player of his team
LeBron is the better player careerwise and peak wise and I doubt Durant can ever change that. Even if he wins the title with the Knicks, which I highly doubt, he won't leapfrog him. The only way I can see for him to enhance his stature is stay at GSW, or go to another top team (Bucks, Houston) and keep racking up rings.
Or he chose to go to a better workplace, with better colleagues, in a better city. I think legacy means more to fans than most players. They're just people making choices for themselves, trying to live their lives as best as they can, just like the rest of us.Turned out well for him only if you look at rings as the main/only accomplishment an NBA player can get.
He was the main player on the team that blew a 3-1 lead against the Warriors. There's no reason to suggest that he couldn't have won a ring with the Thunder but he chickened out and opted for the easy way, which will forever tarnish his legacy unless he goes to another team this summer and wins another ring there (which is what LeBron did, against the best regular season team of all time).
First sentence is true, but what's your point? We are talking about legacies, not whether his choice suited his life.Or he chose to go to a better workplace, with better colleagues, in a better city. I think legacy means more to fans than most players. They're just people making choices for themselves, trying to live their lives as best as they can, just like the rest of us.
Not to get too philosophical but it genuinely feels like some of you see these guys as virtual characters that exist and make decisions for your entertainment.
This is not directed at you, necessarily, you may just be talking about his career in a vacuum. Some here take it way too personally though, I think.
I think some people are making judgement about a man's personal character and qualities (mostly negative) based on that decision. Calling him a bitch, a coward etc., when "bravery" has nothing to do with it. It bothers me a bit. That's my point, I guess.First sentence is true, but what's your point? We are talking about legacies, not whether his choice suited his life.
Fair, but I think fans of the game are entitled to jeer him after he essentially ruined the competitive balance of the game.I think some people are making judgement about a man's personal character and qualities (mostly negative) based on that decision. Calling him a bitch, a coward etc., when "bravery" has nothing to do with it. It bothers me a bit. That's my point, I guess.
Or he chose to go to a better workplace, with better colleagues, in a better city. I think legacy means more to fans than most players. They're just people making choices for themselves, trying to live their lives as best as they can, just like the rest of us.
Not to get too philosophical but it genuinely feels like some of you see these guys as virtual characters that exist and make decisions for your entertainment.
This is not directed at you, necessarily, you may just be talking about his career in a vacuum. Some here take it way too personally though, I think.
I would have gone to Warriors too if I was KD. I find the legacy stuff pretty lame and almost childish. Go get your rings and retire happy. Fans won’t give a feck after a time period.
You just have to look at this thread every season to see how dissatisfied NBA fans are with the current balance of power in the NBA. The last 2 Finals have been 4-0 and 4-1 and totally non-competitive, and it will be no different if Toronto makes it to the Finals this year.I would have gone to Warriors too if I was KD. I find the legacy stuff pretty lame and almost childish. Go get your rings and retire happy. Fans won’t give a feck after a time period.
Dynasties have always existed to be fair. Lakers went 12-3 in the finals for their threepeat.You just have to look at this thread every season to see how dissatisfied NBA fans are with the current balance of power in the NBA. The last 2 Finals have been 4-0 and 4-1 and totally non-competitive, and it will be no different if Toronto makes it to the Finals this year.
They would've had a dynasty with or without Durant though. I quite liked the Warriors in the beginning because they built their team the right way, now it's just boring and waiting for them to eventually break up. I don't fault them for signing him of course, they would've been mad not to. But Durant fecked the league a bit for me by doing what he did.Dynasties have always existed to be fair. Lakers went 12-3 in the finals for their threepeat.
Personally I don't blame him, I blame LeBron and Wade for setting the precedent.Well can you blame him? It's the ultimate achievement and it turned out well for him, rather to be nearly man...
Yeah but i'm jinxing on purpose, so it's working fineAre you sure it wasn't this guy working the jinx magic?
Good man! Keep it upYeah but i'm jinxing on purpose, so it's working fine
Didn't work in GS-Portland series thoughGood man! Keep it up
He's probably recording himself shooting.who was recording this and why
You just have to look at this thread every season to see how dissatisfied NBA fans are with the current balance of power in the NBA. The last 2 Finals have been 4-0 and 4-1 and totally non-competitive, and it will be no different if Toronto makes it to the Finals this year.
Nah definitely don’t agree with that, of course people care about that and know that he went to the Heat to get his first 2. Would’ve been a lot more accomplished if he had won all 3 in Cleveland or without one, maybe 2 other HOF’ers.They’ll get over it. I wasn't satisfied during the Lakers 3peat but it means nothing now which was my point originally about so called legacy. The future won’t be dissecting KD’s decision to join the Warriors. They’ll just look at his rings.
All this asterix stuff was mentioned when Lebron won his first ring. (iirc) it was after a 66 game season. No one cares now, they just know he has 3 rings.
All NBA teams are out:
1st team:
Curry
Harden
George
Antetokounmpo
Jokic
2nd team:
Lillard
Irving
Durant
Leonard (Kawhi not Meyers)
Embiid
3rd team:
Westbrook
Walker
Griffin
James
Gobert
After the other night I felt he deserved it.Thanks for the clarification, had me confused