Just got some tickets to Raptors 2nd round, home game 3 (vs probably Cavs). Will it get that far?
You can scratch that probably, it'll definitely be the Cavs, they're already qualified. As for the Raptors it looks quite likely, they have the better roster and are up 3-2 with home court advantage.Just got some tickets to Raptors 2nd round, home game 3 (vs probably Cavs). Will it get that far?
Ah yes, just seen Cavs have done it.You can scratch that probably, it'll definitely be the Cavs, they're already qualified. As for the Raptors it looks quite likely, they have the better roster and are up 3-2 with home court advantage.
Edit: Or did you mean the 3rd game at home, which would be game 6?
phew, good to know!It did last year. And with Kyrie and Love not doing so well this post season, there is a good chance that Cleveland may not be able to close this out in 5 games.
Based on the 22 shots he took in his 20 year career?It was a hyperbole to illustrate how shit Shaq was at shooting (and yep, he was quite bad at it).
Harden going 2-13 from the arc and Houston overall 6-37 (a shocking 16%) from 3 point shots is definitely a cause for concern as that is something that they need have going really well if they are to stand any chance to go deep into this postseason. I mean, if OKC is outplaying you with 3 point shooting then there's something really wrong haha. I was hopeful of them outscoring their playoff opponents earlier which was largely dependent on their shooting but play like this and those veterans in San Antonio would dispatch them without breaking a sweat.I am a little concerned about Houston now. Harden is struggling from the field and their 3 point game has reduced a lot. I can't tell if that was OKC's defense or just them struggling. They will have to improve against the Spurs (probably) though.
Well said.The great thing about Westbrook he consistently satisfies his fans and detractors.
Well said.
Thanks. Just look at this
These numbers effectively make both sides of the argument for you.
*59-152How many shots did he make in the entire series? Even though it only lasted 5 games it must have been close to 200.
EDIT:
6-23 in Game 1
17-43 in Game 2
11-24 in Game 3
10-28 in Game 4
15-34 in Game 5
49-152 in the series.
In fairness, they got a title out of Walton and kudos to Z-Bo for punching the rapistSpoken like someone who has been an NBA fan for a couple years. The Blazers took Saw Bowie over Michael Jordan. They took Greg Oden over Kevin Durant. They drafted Bill Walton, one of the greatest players of all time, and got 209 games out of him due to injuries. They drafted Brandon Roy and watched injuries destroy his career after only 4 seasons. Zach Randolph punched Ruben Patterson in the eye during practice!
Think so myself. This was probably the last straw.Paul is incredible, just too bad he is a whiney fecker. Spurs bound?
Paul is incredible, just too bad he is a whiney fecker. Spurs bound?
How many shots did he make in the entire series? Even though it only lasted 5 games it must have been close to 200.
EDIT:
6-23 in Game 1
17-43 in Game 2
11-24 in Game 3
10-28 in Game 4
15-34 in Game 5
49-152 in the series.
Think so myself. This was probably the last straw.
Supposedly as president of the P.A. he put in a rule which would give him a massive contract for staying with the Clippers, but he has never struck me as someone who chases the money. We will see. I agree regarding moving to the East, but realistically which challenger needs him there? Cavs, Celtics, Wiz and Raptors all have their PG. Bucks? I just don't see it.Clippers are apparently convinced that he stays. I am pretty sure he should not stay, he will have offers from all over the league and honestly, he's not winning anything with Clippers.
He should try going East. Not sure where.
This, in a nutshell. I've vacillated back and forth all season on whether he deserves it or not but either way it's a really pointless debate about a really pointless player. Just give him the damn thing and move on. Also please God let's consign the most useless statistic in basketball history to the sporting scrapheap - the triple double. Wtf - when your usage rate is higher than your shooting percentage and people are patting you on the back, something's wrong.I'm happy this series is over, just give him two MVP and we'd finally be done with this annoying debate. If they don't give it to Westbrook we'll have the same discussion next year again, not really thrilled about that prospect.
This, in a nutshell. I've vacillated back and forth all season on whether he deserves it or not but either way it's a really pointless debate about a really pointless player. Just give him the damn thing and move on. Also please God let's consign the most useless statistic in basketball history to the sporting scrapheap - the triple double. Wtf - when your usage rate is higher than your shooting percentage and people are patting you on the back, something's wrong.
I don't actually. I'm just tired of the same back and forth debate as to whether he deserves the MVP or not. Like @Kasper said, just give it to him so we don't have to do this again. The sum total of his season is that he's taken a mediocre team to one playoff win and beaten a 60 year old record that the holder of said record didn't realize what he'd accomplished until 15 years later when the NBA went back and started adding up totals. Back in Oscar's day it was just wins and losses that counted. These days unfortunately, "it's not whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game."Seems you really hate him
He may be pointless for you or us but for his team he isn't. without him OKC wouldn't have even reached the playoffs. Yea he's selfish and is searching for his numbers and triple doubles but remove him from OKC and tell me what their rank will be in West conf. ? He single handedly made them reach the playoffs. One look at his teammates when he isn't on the court and you see how terrible and clueless they are with the ball. They can't do anything without him, so he's not a pointless player IMO from his team point of view.
I'm hoping (really, really, really hoping) that a big part of wanting to give Russ the MVP is that he's done something that hasn't been done in 60 odd years. If he does it again next year, I'm hoping (really, really, really hoping) that it will be looked at as kind of old news - especially when his team continues to win less than 50 games.Why wouldn't we have to do this again? He will be chasing the same award next season as well, in the exact same manner, being Mr Triple Double.
I don't actually. I'm just tired of the same back and forth debate as to whether he deserves the MVP or not. Like @Kasper said, just give it to him so we don't have to do this again. The sum total of his season is that he's taken a mediocre team to one playoff win and beaten a 60 year old record that the holder of said record didn't realize what he'd accomplished until 15 years later when the NBA went back and started adding up totals. Back in Oscar's day it was just wins and losses that counted. These days unfortunately, "it's not whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game."[/QUOTE]
Kind of weird to complain about that but celebrate this.
From Foxsports:
There have only been two players who have scored 35 or more points in less than 30 minutes in a playoff game in the last 33 years (per Basketball Reference data, which only goes back that far) — Curry did it Monday night, scoring 37 on 7-of-11 shooting from beyond the arc in 29 minutes.
The other player to do it: Michael Jordan. (He only scored 35 ...).
Keven Durant's team - ha!
It was all just Steffortless.
I'd be amazed (well, really surprised anyway) if any top players want to go anywhere near Oklahoma City in the near future as long as Westbrook is doing his thing. That locker room, from the outside looking in, appears to be one of the most dysfunctional out there.OKC will win more next year I reckon, they will be able to sort out some shooting in the off-season, and that will help Russ big time.
Last time I looked the Dubs had won 207 games over the last 3 years including one Championship and on the particular night you refer to Curry scored 37 points on 60% shooting (in a game which they won), far superior to Westbrook's recent efforts.
It was all just "Stephortless."
It was great performance in a WIN. I can't see what's so odd about celebrating that. The fact that Foxsports chose to point out that that particular achievement had only been done once before in 30 odd years was just "grist for the mill" as far as I was concerned. I used it to illustrate that he had played really well. It was his overall "Stephortless" performance that mattered to me.If only wins and losses matter than curry's particular performance shouldn't be praised as per your criteria, its a bit weird to cherry pick and celebrate some records while ignoring the others.
IfThe locker room is definitely not dysfuntional either. The team is, yes. But as a lockeroom they are very much together.
Ifanyone in the locker roomWestbrook comes out and says they're not dysfunctional, they're not dysfunctional.
This, in a nutshell. I've vacillated back and forth all season on whether he deserves it or not but either way it's a really pointless debate about a really pointless player. Just give him the damn thing and move on. Also please God let's consign the most useless statistic in basketball history to the sporting scrapheap - the triple double. Wtf - when your usage rate is higher than your shooting percentage and people are patting you on the back, something's wrong.
It was for the Houston series. It was 42.5% vs 41.7% for regular season - so very close.Is this actually true?!
I know he had smashed Kobe's record for usage rate in a season.