I hope Utah qualify with a fit Gobert they'd be a better bet to snatch a couple of games as opposed to Clips without Blake.
Rockets - Spurs would be a lot more interesting. How does Pop workaround the defense with Gasol in there if Houston pin them down.
I find it puzzling that the absence of Steve Kerr seems to be regarded as not that relevant. Do you guys really think that without the first team coach (he might be absent till the end of the season, you know) the Warriors lose only a couple of games and just walk through to the finals?
Lets hope that he isn't out for the entire playoff.I find it puzzling that the absence of Steve Kerr seems to be regarded as not that relevant. Do you guys really think that without the first team coach (he might be absent till the end of the season, you know) the Warriors lose only a couple of games and just walk through to the finals?
I don't care if he was playing against the Washington Generals. To do something that has only happened twice in thirty odd years or more is pretty damn good.Not to mention he did it against an all time elite defensive unit like the current Portland Trailblazers team.
Yes. Their structure really is that good, their team really is that good, and the guy replacing Kerr is a former head coach with finals experienceI find it puzzling that the absence of Steve Kerr seems to be regarded as not that relevant. Do you guys really think that without the first team coach (he might be absent till the end of the season, you know) the Warriors lose only a couple of games and just walk through to the finals?
From Foxsports:
There have only been two players who have scored 35 or more points in less than 30 minutes in a playoff game in the last 33 years (per Basketball Reference data, which only goes back that far) — Curry did it Monday night, scoring 37 on 7-of-11 shooting from beyond the arc in 29 minutes.
The other player to do it: Michael Jordan. (He only scored 35 ...).
Keven Durant's team - ha!
It was all just Steffortless.
Also this.Never use this again.
Hey, if it's good enough for the "Inside the NBA" crew, it's good enough for me.Never use this again.
I don't care if he was playing against the Washington Generals. To do something that has only happened twice in thirty odd years or more is pretty damn good.
Let me guess - was it Shaq?Hey, if it's good enough for the "Inside the NBA" crew, it's good enough for me.
Not to mention he did it against an all time elite defensive unit like the current Portland Trailblazers team.
I didn't issue any disclaimers, I just quoted Foxsports and the TNT crew of course. Breathe! Steffortless! Steffortless! Steffortless!And yet you issued all kinds of disclaimers for something that has only happened twice in nba history.
No, it's all of them. When he hits a long bomb and they show it on highlights they all say at once in a hushed tone "it was just Steffortless."Let me guess - was it Shaq?
I saw what I saw, in that first quarter.Are you trying to suggest that Meyers Leonard is not an elite defender? Or is it Lillard who cannot defend?!
Bunch of clowns. Has to be Shaq who started it tho, the man cannot stop coming up with these. Remember the 'ShawShaq Redemption'No, it's all of them. When he hits a long bomb and they show it on highlights they all say at once in a hushed tone "that was just Steffortless."
I couldn't tell you for sure. I tried looking it up and the only thing I found was that it's actually "Stephortless." As to Shaq, he can be amusing in small doses but he does tend to beat this kind of thing to death.Bunch of clowns. Has to be Shaq who started it tho, the man cannot stop coming up with these. Remember the 'ShawShaq Redemption'
I saw what I saw, in that first quarter.
Just seen this, don't if it' true but whatever:
Portland has outscored the dubs by 4 points in the 105 minutes JaVale McGee was on the bench. In the 39 minutes he was on the floor, they were +51
It's JaVale's era
(Stealth edit) Take that for data
Oladipo has yet to show consistency over an entire season and has a lot of injury problems. Adams has no offensive game barring tips and dunks and his free-throw shooting means it's hard to ever make him the focal point of the offense. Kanter is skilled offensively but is just a sieve on defense, it's ridiculous at times so it's hard to play him significant minutes and when you pair him with Taj or Adams, there just isn't enough perimeter shooting to stay with Houston. You're right in the sense that Houston's roster makes sense while OKC's doesn't.I think it's mostly the system and coaching. Houston's team is built around Harden, whereas OKC's was set up for KD, but the gap between the quality of players isn't ginormous, in fact, many preseason reports projected OKC to have a better season than Houston (some were posted a few pages back). On paper, Oladipo, Adams, Kanter, and Taj are good role players.
.
You're no fun, manI don't think it has as much to do with McGee being great as with Portland back up unit, which he was against most of the time, being absolutely pointless beyond belief.
I was actually more confident last year to be honest and we know how that turned out. I think if the team can avoid any more injuries and the Steve Kerr situation settles down then they have a very good chance - nowhere near 95% though. 538 gives them a 70% chance of winning it all. I'm not sure I'd go that high but that's mostly because for me it's very hard to realistically count LeBron out until the fat lady has started on that first note.@charlton66 how confident are you that the Dubs win the championship this year? Interested to get the view of a Warriors fan. Everyone else appears to basically have them at about a 95% lock.
Not sure that I would really buy this. I doubt that there is a big difference in the size of hands of Shaq/Jordan/Howard and the likes of Gasol bothers, Duncan or Dirk Nowitzki who were very good at it. The thing is that Shaq/Jordan/Howard are actually terrible at shooting from anywhere which is more than 3 meters from the basket. If it was the size of the hands, then all big players would be suffering from it but that is hardly the case. In fact nowadays that everyone can shoot, you see the modern centers and power forwards (Cousin, Davis, KAT, Love) who are quite good at shooting from everywhere including free throws (5 seconds per day of thinking). The thing is that the likes of Shaq and co. weren't very skilled in the game. They just happened to be stronger and bigger than everyone else and so overwhelmed them but they weren't much skilled. I could have probably defeated Shaq one on one if we weren't allowed to shoot within 4 meters from the basket.
For guards, being useless at free throws is extra unexplainable. Guards are supposed to be able to shoot.
Shaq was probably the most skilled big man in history, shooting aside. There is absolutely no way you would score on him one on one in his prime.Not sure that I would really buy this. I doubt that there is a big difference in the size of hands of Shaq/Jordan/Howard and the likes of Gasol bothers, Duncan or Dirk Nowitzki who were very good at it. The thing is that Shaq/Jordan/Howard are actually terrible at shooting from anywhere which is more than 3 meters from the basket. If it was the size of the hands, then all big players would be suffering from it but that is hardly the case. In fact nowadays that everyone can shoot, you see the modern centers and power forwards (Cousin, Davis, KAT, Love) who are quite good at shooting from everywhere including free throws (5 seconds per day of thinking). The thing is that the likes of Shaq and co. weren't very skilled in the game. They just happened to be stronger and bigger than everyone else and so overwhelmed them but they weren't much skilled. I could have probably defeated Shaq one on one if we weren't allowed to shoot within 4 meters from the basket.
For guards, being useless at free throws is extra unexplainable. Guards are supposed to be able to shoot.
Guys, don't take me seriously. It was a hyperbole to illustrate how shit Shaq was at shooting (and yep, he was quite bad at it).
He is one of the best centers of all time, likely the strongest player to have played in the league, but his shooting was bad.
Duncan was much more skilled than Shaq. So are the Gasol brothers, Nowitzki and from recent crop of big men, the likes of Davis or KAT. They just aren't near as strong as him.
Leonard and his new contract is the worst thing that has ever happened to this franchise.
When you are so much bigger than everyone, then that is easily. He was physically gifted, likely the most powerful player in the history of the league.That's if we assume that post up play and inside scoring, defending, shot blocking and rebounding are not skills because he was elite at all of it.
Free throws are easy if you practice correctly though. My coach literally made the whole team shoot free throws after practice until we make 100 consecutive shots as a team and we were all hitting over 80% in actual games by the time the season was over.People think shooting free-throws is so easy. I play basketball regularly and I have friends that I play with the couldn't make 3 out of 10 to save their lives despite practicing them. I really don't like it when people say there is no excuse for being bad at it. Dwight Howard practices and practices his free throws and still shoots a poor percentage. The idea that players can just magically get better is wrong.
Yeah I know all this except Randolph. It was a hyperbole, of course I don't think giving $10M a year contract to an absolutely dreadful player, in a time when these $10M would not have done us anything anyway because nobody wants to come to Portland, is the worst that could ever happenSpoken like someone who has been an NBA fan for a couple years. The Blazers took Saw Bowie over Michael Jordan. They took Greg Oden over Kevin Durant. They drafted Bill Walton, one of the greatest players of all time, and got 209 games out of him due to injuries. They drafted Brandon Roy and watched injuries destroy his career after only 4 seasons. Zach Randolph punched Ruben Patterson in the eye during practice!
Based on the first round it's difficult to see them lose. Their best competition is Cavs who are, currently, insanely reliant on a 32 year old to pretty much not only perform sensationally himself in every game (that second half in game 3 was simply god-level which you can't expect often) but only pull that bunch together and organise the offense. He is obviously known to reach that level during playoffs but he's only getting older every year and needs better support. If all of Kyrie, Love and Thompson don't pick up their game massively for the remaining postseason, especially during the series vs Dubs they'll be in massive, massive trouble. And that's pretty much the best bet to stop Warriors from winning - all of Spurs, Rockets and co. have bigger problems that have been exposed so far already.I was actually more confident last year to be honest and we know how that turned out. I think if the team can avoid any more injuries and the Steve Kerr situation settles down then they have a very good chance - nowhere near 95% though. 538 gives them a 70% chance of winning it all. I'm not sure I'd go that high but that's mostly because for me it's very hard to realistically count LeBron out until the fat lady has started on that first note.