ArseHat
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 1,580
Never said you did. Just wanted to put some context into the two counterexamples you provided.Ok but I'm not calling Jordan or Bryant soft, or implying it as Redondo did.
Never said you did. Just wanted to put some context into the two counterexamples you provided.Ok but I'm not calling Jordan or Bryant soft, or implying it as Redondo did.
Nurkic is a beast, you're record with him is amazing plus all your players are getting back to their best, I don't think you will beat GSW in the playoffs but I do think you will give them a tough, grinding series. Especially if they are trying to integrate KD back into the fold,Yay, great win over Houston!
Over 7 games series we do not have a chance against Warriors but we will scare them in 2 or 3 games like we did last season (despite 4-1 it was a very tight series). We gain a lot by having Nurkic out there but they now have Durant.
Cleveland lose again, this is becoming ridiculous. Not that I mind, they are already below Warriors, Spurs and Rockets and now find themselves below Celtics too. Time for Thunder, Jazz and Clippers to overtake them and that first round pick could be much better than we ever anticipated.
lol at LeBron being better than Kobe, stop looking at the padded numbers. No way in hell could LeBron win the whole show in 09 and 10 with the team Kobe had. He wouldn't of even got close. Not only did Kobe win but he damn well averaged over 30 in both finals.
The Process.I wonder who the next face of the NBA will be once LeBron retires. There are a couple of guys like Leonard, Davis & co who are still young and already household names but not on the same level as previous great players. Everyone in Europe knew who Jordan, Kobe and LeBron were, even if you aren't into basketball. That's not gonna be the case with Leonard or Davis imo.
Other guys will become more popular once he retires. As long as he's active, he'll cast a shadow over the others.I wonder who the next face of the NBA will be once LeBron retires. There are a couple of guys like Leonard, Davis & co who are still young and already household names but not on the same level as previous great players. Everyone in Europe knew who Jordan, Kobe and LeBron were, even if you aren't into basketball. That's not gonna be the case with Leonard or Davis imo.
Yeah we are still in the LeBron era for another 5 odd years at least, which is roughly the same time around when Davis could leave New Orleans..Other guys will become more popular once he retires. As long as he's active, he'll cast a shadow over the others.
Kawhi is great, but not that exciting, so I doubt it will be him.I wonder who the next face of the NBA will be once LeBron retires. There are a couple of guys like Leonard, Davis & co who are still young and already household names but not on the same level as previous great players. Everyone in Europe knew who Jordan, Kobe and LeBron were, even if you aren't into basketball. That's not gonna be the case with Leonard or Davis imo.
This. He's got the style of play and entertainment factor that would be very marketable. To make it better, he should replace LeBron at Cavs.And he is very exciting.
That's a bold claim... He's already 24, Duncan had won 2 rings by the time he was 26. I know you don't choose your team of course, but 5x champ, 15x all-star will take some doing to overtake. He's a lock for future MVP though and I agree he has the potential to be up there with the all-time great PFs, yeah.Kawhi is great, but not that exciting, so I doubt it will be him.
Davis, probably. He has potential to be the best power forward of all time, IMO. And he is very exciting.
So wrong with this post (coming from someone who likes Kobe more than James):lol at LeBron being better than Kobe, stop looking at the padded numbers. No way in hell could LeBron win the whole show in 09 and 10 with the team Kobe had. He wouldn't of even got close. Not only did Kobe win but he damn well averaged over 30 in both finals.
In fact Cleveland in both those years where they were the best team in the NBA lost 4-2 to Orlando then 4-2 to Boston lol, both teams in which Kobe demolished.
That's when LeBron goes oh shit I can't win in Cleveland no point to keep trying here (Despite having the best record two years in row), I need more help (a phrase he himselfs utters with impunity to everyone that will listen and did so again this year) so he goes to Miami to form the super-team and gets Dirk dicked in the finals 4-2, after might I add they were caught making fun of Dirk. I guess he showed them.
In 2014 part of that superteam he has to be carried off court for cramps? Are you kidding me? MJ and Kobe would have had to been amputated to let that happen ffs.
And guess what happens there, LeBron gets outplayed by a 3rd year player called Kawhi who not only destroys him on defence but gets it done on the other end and takes the finals mvp against the super team playing for a three peat? And it wasn't even close they got railroaded 4-1.
Better than Kobe, ahaha, puhhhllleeeaaasssseee. Try watching the games not the numbers.
lol at LeBron being better than Kobe, stop looking at the padded numbers. No way in hell could LeBron win the whole show in 09 and 10 with the team Kobe had. He wouldn't of even got close. Not only did Kobe win but he damn well averaged over 30 in both finals.
In fact Cleveland in both those years where they were the best team in the NBA lost 4-2 to Orlando then 4-2 to Boston lol, both teams in which Kobe demolished.
That's when LeBron goes oh shit I can't win in Cleveland no point to keep trying here (Despite having the best record two years in row), I need more help (a phrase he himselfs utters with impunity to everyone that will listen and did so again this year) so he goes to Miami to form the super-team and gets Dirk dicked in the finals 4-2, after might I add they were caught making fun of Dirk. I guess he showed them.
In 2014 part of that superteam he has to be carried off court for cramps? Are you kidding me? MJ and Kobe would have had to been amputated to let that happen ffs.
And guess what happens there, LeBron gets outplayed by a 3rd year player called Kawhi who not only destroys him on defence but gets it done on the other end and takes the finals mvp against the super team playing for a three peat? And it wasn't even close they got railroaded 4-1.
Better than Kobe, ahaha, puhhhllleeeaaasssseee. Try watching the games not the numbers.
It is a bold claim, but he has the talent to overtake Duncan IMO. He's a fantastic player and will become only better.That's a bold claim... He's already 24, Duncan had won 2 rings by the time he was 26. I know you don't choose your team of course, but 5x champ, 15x all-star will take some doing to overtake. He's a lock for future MVP though and I agree he has the potential to be up there with the all-time great PFs, yeah.
Disagree with the bolded part, 09/10 was his seventh year in the league and he had already been to the Finals in 2007 pretty much on his own. You simply can say whether the Lakers would've won those titles with LeBron instead of Kobe imo, but it's certainly possible. Fisher was great and clutch against Orlando and the whole team stepped up against Boston in '10.So wrong with this post (coming from someone who likes Kobe more than James):
1) LeBron of last season could have won those titles Kobe did. LeBron of 2009-2010 probably not because he wasn't that experienced, and people learn by losing. Not even Jordan was winning titles when he was young.
2) Mentioning LeBron for padding stats (to be fair, he did it when he was at Miami) as an argument for LeBron < Kobe is ridiculous. Kobe has been doing it during his entire career.
3) That LA team was fine. Gasol is one of the best No.2 in history. Before he joined Lakers and after he left him, Kobe wasn't able to send the Lakers to playoffs. Heck, in 2010 a lot of people say that Gasol should have been finals MVP.
4) Not LeBron's fault that Bryant wasn't a good team player and so other superstars avoided Lakers like the plague. At the contrary, other all-star players love to go and play with LeBron, because LeBron is a fantastic team player.
5) As Eboue said, Kobe missed three matches in a final. So yeah, he might have been tougher than LeBron, but everyone misses some matches.
Agreed. He will dominate the league in the years coming. Saw some stat a couple of days ago that he was the first player since Shaq in 2000 to have four consecutive 30+ points, 13+ rebounds games.It is a bold claim, but he has the talent to overtake Duncan IMO. He's a fantastic player and will become only better.
Jordan won his first ring when he was 27. These things aren't always linear, and as you said, a lot depends on the team.
LaVar BallI wonder who the next face of the NBA will be once LeBron retires. There are a couple of guys like Leonard, Davis & co who are still young and already household names but not on the same level as previous great players. Everyone in Europe knew who Jordan, Kobe and LeBron were, even if you aren't into basketball. That's not gonna be the case with Leonard or Davis imo.
His son might just.LaVar Ball
Or sons. If all three become top players they'll be very marketable, as a collective, even if they're not the best. Their name is Ball, ffs.His son might just.
Their name is Ball, ffs.
Who is the bigger talent though, Lonzo or LaMelo ?
Yeah, it's looking really solid all round.I think Lonzo is supposed to be much better.
Out of this year's draft class at least 1 player will be an absolute star. I would probably say that 3 or 4 will be stars. This could be another class of 2003.
I'll be so damn disappointed if the Lakers end up outside the first three picksI think Lonzo is supposed to be much better.
Out of this year's draft class at least 1 player will be an absolute star. I would probably say that 3 or 4 will be stars. This could be another class of 2003.
Bit harsh on the Dubs there , but you're right about the Blazers. I tentatively agree with @Sarni that the Warriors SHOULD win but the current Blazers scare me more than anybody else of the predicted 4-8 seeds. Getting Durant back could be a blessing or a curse depending on how successful reintegrating him back into the team turns out to be. However, this iteration of the Blazers is not the team I would have picked to be trying that experiment out because at the moment they are playing like one of the best 5 teams in the NBA.@Sarni damn you guys are hot right now. Can you carry this into the playoffs and do us the favour of removing the Golden State filth?
Yes. They have the right to swap picks this year, meaning they will get Nets pick which worst case scenario will be no. 4 (they would have to be very unlucky for that to happen) and own the 2018 pick as well.Is it so that Celtics still have picks left from the Nets trade?
That'd be amazing actually as 76ers would have it and it won't be lower than 5th. 76ers should also get a good pick themselves - they have the right to swap picks with Sacramento so it won't land below 6th either.I'll be so damn disappointed if the Lakers end up outside the first three picks
Knowing the Sixers they'd probably still feck it up somehow.That'd be amazing actually as 76ers would have it and it won't be lower than 5th. 76ers should also get a good pick themselves - they have the right to swap picks with Sacramento so it won't land below 6th either.
If Sixers could get Malik Monk and one of the point guard talents from this draft (Fultz, Ball, Fox and Smith are all going to be good) that would be some exciting team.
Nah that's Kings. Philly have not drafted that bad. Embiid is a stud, Noel was good and their only fault is not getting good value back for him and Okafor was an obvious choice at 3 even if he did not work out. Simmons will be good too.Knowing the Sixers they'd probably still feck it up somehow.
I'd actually postulate (argue is too strong) that the current face of the NBA is Stephen Curry. Not saying LeBron is not up there too but when fans get to the stadium a couple of hours early just to watch him warm up you know that there is something special going on. Over the last couple of years, I think the NBA has certainly encouraged that line of thinking. As has been discussed on here over the last couple of days LeBron is just a unique physical specimen, Steph is more of your every man which the fans can more easily relate to. I believe the NBA has definitely done its best to push that angle.I wonder who the next face of the NBA will be once LeBron retires. There are a couple of guys like Leonard, Davis & co who are still young and already household names but not on the same level as previous great players. Everyone in Europe knew who Jordan, Kobe and LeBron were, even if you aren't into basketball. That's not gonna be the case with Leonard or Davis imo.
You get the real picture once you step outside the United States and ask people who is the first player currently playing who comes to their mind when they think of basketball.I'd actually postulate (argue is too strong) that the current face of the NBA is Stephen Curry. Not saying LeBron is not up there too but when fans get to the stadium a couple of hours early just to watch him warm up you know that there is something special going on. Over the last couple of years, I think the NBA has certainly encouraged that line of thinking. As has been discussed on here over the last couple of days LeBron is just a unique physical specimen, Steph is more of your every man and the NBA has definitely done its best to push that angle.
That's fair. In the US I'd certainly say it was now Stephen Curry.You get the real picture once you step outside the United States and ask people who is the first player currently playing who comes to their mind when they think of basketball.
Perhaps for a brief period from mid of 14-15 season up till the end of 15-16 regular season, or more accurately till his injury. After that he made a weak comeback in the playoffs and after what we all witnessed in the finals, his stock definitely faded and obviously the light was back on the king.That's fair. But in the US I'd certainly say it was now Stephen Curry.
The point being though, does the NBA really care about non-basketball fans? Jersey sales are (for the most part) indicative of basketball fans. That's who the NBA really care about and advertise to. Steph Curry appears to be the most popular player among basketball fans - hence the product/face that the NBA is trying to sell.I just asked my girlfriend if she knew who Steph Curry was. She said "I've heard that". Then I asked her if she knew who LeBron James was. She said "Yes, of course".
I imagine that would be the case with most non-basketball fans. We're in Europe though, to be fair.