Crackers
greasy ginfers
I've seen a few people complaining that's all. It was a question. Are Sporting going to pay any of his wages?Where's that coming from?
(not that it matters much)
I've seen a few people complaining that's all. It was a question. Are Sporting going to pay any of his wages?Where's that coming from?
(not that it matters much)
Is Sporting in the Champions League?
Should be, or at least in a qualification playoff spot.
http://www.independent.ie/sport/soc...-out-on-loan-to-sporting-lisbon-30520932.html
And several other sources. And yes, it does matter.
CheersThey are, already qualified along with Benfica. Porto goes to playoff.
Could be, a few English sites are reporting we're paying his wages, though. Better not be the case.Think people just confuse this...
Simultaneously the SPORTING SAD reached agreement with Manchester United for the temporary transfer, free of charge, for SPORTING SAD athlete Nani, until the end of season 2014/2015.
...with thinking we're paying all the wages. Sporting added free of charge because it calls it transfer, not loan. At least I believe that's the case.
That part was quoted in Sporting Witness' twit in that "article".
Could be, a few English sites are reporting we're paying his wages, though. Better not be the case.
Of course it will be the case. Sporting could only pay a fraction of his wages.Could be, a few English sites are reporting we're paying his wages, though. Better not be the case.
Having gone back to Portugal on loan I'd be amazed if we can now ever get that sort of fee for him. We've made it clear we don't fancy him so he'll move on for £5m odd next summer, I'd guess.
Lisbon on English.Lissabon.
I've just read we're paying full wages, surely that's not true?
So depressing, a few years ago he was top 3 wingers on the planet.
No it isn't a fantasy. Nani from 2010-2012 was only behind Ronaldo & Robben.Fantasy.
I'm ... free ...
Lisbon on English.
I guess it does make sense. But the guy could have been so good! ah well.Obviously, but it's not about wingers, all options wouldn't be good enough for the wing, apart from Januzaj. It's about wing-backs, and Nani won't play there, whereas Valencia could be useful. As a striker Nani would probably be 6th choice or something, so it does actually make sense to let him go. Whether a full transfer would've been the better option is another story. We don't know the details of the deal.
Only in reverse alphabetical order.No it isn't a fantasy. Nani from 2010-2012 was only behind Ronaldo & Robben.
just disapointing its only a loan probably end up been back here nexh season.... sigh
Only in reverse alphabetical order.
he has been shocking for two years, sulks something cronic and makes tarabt look like a team player.God such posts depress me. The lad has been very good for us at times. It's not like he has stolen his wages here. Some really bad and disgraceful overreactions.
He has more assists that most number 10's. Keep your shit quiet if you refuse to get your facts right.he has been shocking for two years, sulks something cronic and makes tarabt look like a team player.
he has been shocking for two years, sulks something cronic and makes tarabt look like a team player.