Massive Spanner
The Football Wrench
You know I was joking right?
You know I was joking right?
Just because this happened doesn't mean it was inevitable. Lots of clubs have maintained success with different managers. Look at Bayern.
The problem with David Moyes is that he wasn't good enough. It's that simple.
I find it hard to think of any clubs who have had one manager, for so long, and so entirely responsible for our success. Got any examples?
The Moyes era was so unbearable that Vidic signed a deal with Inter before the season ended(which is a terrible thing to do for a club captain to do).
That does sound bad.
Clearly Vidic had no trust in Moyes and where he was taking the club and thought it best to leave the sinking ship, asap.
It did amaze me that when Moyes was getting bad results, our fans gave him a standing ovation - that was perplexing.
And as for the "Chosen One" banner - that was so cringe worthy. If we were hiring Mourinho, it would make some sense (ie. in reference to "Special One"), but for any other manager (especially one who was doomed to failure) it was not a good idea.
He'd have done better with LVG's budget
So it's alright for our captain to leave the sinking ship first?
Moyes was the chosen one, he was hand picked by SAF, which is probably the greatest reference anyone can have on his/her resume.
Nah, he wouldnt.He'd have done better with LVG's budget
I second this.Nah, he wouldnt.
When you see the actual captain of the ship, drilling holes in the hull(?) of the ship, you leave the damn ship.
Nah, he wouldnt.
But the point is that Bayern's situation is not comparable. First of all they never even had a manager, they had a coach, they switched a successful coach with another. We can't call them managers when what they did is different from what Fergie did. Barcelona switched Pep for Tito and did not suffer also and Tito was far from an established name. At those clubs, the coach is just another cog in the machine.I agree every situation is unique. I'm merely saying that Bayern had a very good established manager and switched him for another really good one and there wasn't a huge problem. Yes, coming after SAF made things much much harder, but failure was not inevitable. Making a hash of the summer transfers was not inevitable. Having no tactical nous was not inevitable. Losing the players' respect was not inevitable. Failing to qualify for Europe was not inevitable. Looking like a frightened gollum in every interview was not inevitable. A better manager could have made it through the first year.
He'd have done better with LVG's budget but I think the job was a stage too far for him at that time and we were right to let him go. He has a decent side at Sociedad and I think he'll get another go at a big club somewhere down the line.
He'd have done better with LVG's budget but I think the job was a stage too far for him at that time and we were right to let him go. He has a decent side at Sociedad and I think he'll get another go at a big club somewhere down the line.
Its silly people use the whole "LVG spent £150m" thing to suggest he had an unfair advantage over Moyes.
There is every indication Moyes had the money to spent if he had wanted to. But he dithered.
I do think he suffered by Gill leaving when he did and having to deal with a new CEO learning the ropes at the same time he was. That was unfortunate. Gill wouldve been able to hold his hand a bit more and maybe that summer wouldnt have been such a disaster.
But still, if Moyes had been more assertive he couldve cleared out some of the fringe players and brought in new players. If it was a simple case of spend £150m and win CL football he should have done that, maybe he would still be in his job.
So it's alright for our captain to leave the sinking ship first?
Moyes was the chosen one, he was hand picked by SAF, which is probably the greatest reference anyone can have on his/her resume.
So LVG finishes 7th next season, you'd be fine with Rooney signing a contract with Juventus in January ? Interesting.
Moyes would have been starting from a worse position than Van Gaal though as he had already lost the dressing room at that stage. If he had stayed he would have had to get rid of even more players than LVG did, I think. Which in turn would mean an even more disjointed start to this season, which would have piled even more pressure on Moyes. I can't how he could have rescued things from the low point he reached. His credibility as United manager had been shot to pieces.
He could have bought Herrera last season but waited until the final minute because he believed he could get Fabregas. In the end it was too late to bring Herrera so we were left with a signing that didn't necessarily fit into our team at the time (Fellaini), moreover it was the played he had managed for the past 4 years and he still failed to get the best out of him or find a suitable position on the pitch while new manager has made him one of our biggest strengths.
£60m out of that money went on Di Maria who's barely contriuted during our best spell this season, £30m spent on Herrera could have easily been spent the year before if Moyes had been more decisive, £30m Shaw has been injured most of the time and £15m Blind wasn't really your marquee signings, ditto £15m Rojo. We haven't improved mainly because of new signings, we have improved because of better mentality, preparation and tactics.
Better than van Gaal or better than he did in his first season? He might have done better than his first season, I don't think he'd do anywhere near as we have done this season though - particularly in the big games in which we have excelled over the last couple of months. Don't forget that he was allowed to spend money, Mata and Fellaini were both very expensive signings (Mata was our record transfer at the time) and his downfall was not managing to get the best out of players already present at the club. His solution to that was getting rid of them and replacing them with better players, as he's said numerous times in interviews where he claimed he didn't have a team good enough to do better than he did.
He won't be at a big club again. Can you honestly see the likes of Barcelona, Bayern or Juventus ever contemplating appointing him? They never had before he came to United, not even Spurs would have given him a shot, it's much less likely now.
He could have bought Herrera last season but waited until the final minute because he believed he could get Fabregas. In the end it was too late to bring Herrera so we were left with a signing that didn't necessarily fit into our team at the time (Fellaini), moreover it was the played he had managed for the past 4 years and he still failed to get the best out of him or find a suitable position on the pitch while new manager has made him one of our biggest strengths.
£60m out of that money went on Di Maria who's barely contriuted during our best spell this season, £30m spent on Herrera could have easily been spent the year before if Moyes had been more decisive, £30m Shaw has been injured most of the time and £15m Blind wasn't really your marquee signings, ditto £15m Rojo. We haven't improved mainly because of new signings, we have improved because of better mentality, preparation and tactics.
I like the way you begin your post with that, then go on to make an argument based on no evidence whatsoever.
He'd have done better with LVG's budget
It's pure speculation when the only facts we have point to the opposite.
The thing about the transfer business that isnt captured by what youre saying there (which I agree with BTW) is the perception of control it would have given him. That's important for the players we got rid of as much as for the ones we brought in. Basically, and its a hard thing to quantify, but to some extent Moyes may have had a better grip of the dressing room if he had moved a few people on and brought a few people in who owed their allegiance to him directly. I think this is something Van Gaal benefited from. Obviously he would command more respect anyway simply because of what he has achieved in the game. But by being decisive and shipping so many players out he reminded players who stayed they were only there because he allowed them to be there. I think that's an important psychological factor. I said earlier I dont think the players consciously downed tools and refused to play for him, but they were altogether too comfortable and a sense of entitlement crept in.He could have bought Herrera last season but waited until the final minute because he believed he could get Fabregas. In the end it was too late to bring Herrera so we were left with a signing that didn't necessarily fit into our team at the time (Fellaini), moreover it was the played he had managed for the past 4 years and he still failed to get the best out of him or find a suitable position on the pitch while new manager has made him one of our biggest strengths.
£60m out of that money went on Di Maria who's barely contriuted during our best spell this season, £30m spent on Herrera could have easily been spent the year before if Moyes had been more decisive, £30m Shaw has been injured most of the time and £15m Blind wasn't really your marquee signings, ditto £15m Rojo. We haven't improved mainly because of new signings, we have improved because of better mentality, preparation and tactics.
I cant.Look at the contenders and tell me that Moyes, had he been able to strengthen as he pleased (well, within reason), with an uninterrupted, full summer + pre-season to work over, would've had no chance to build a side capable of a top four finish.
Moyes shopping list:Moyes would have done better with £150m ? Interesting.
I cant.
I know you werent actually talking to me. But just for the record, I cant, anyway.
Not that I am convinced he would have. But Im not convinced he wouldnt either.
What I will say is it wasnt worth the risk. Football being what it is now, he had his chance, he didnt seize it, he had to go. Im happy for him that the experience didnt destroy him. He can rebuild his career in Spain and it looks like he's doing that so everyone is happy. But Manchester United couldnt wait around to see if he could grow into the role, regardless of whether there was a 10% or 50% or 80% chance that would have happened.
You make good points, looking at the squad last year, I'd say that mentality,preparation and tactics were the 3 most important factors the team lacked last season, we had a better defence and attack last year.
It's more a celebration of the occasion than it is a ridicule of the man. I think we were all relieved when he was relieved of his duties.Happy Moyes Is Sacked Day? What the hell..
Cringeworthy thread title, and the constant need to berate and ridicule the man on here is just sad. He didn't do well and was let go, get over it. I wish him all the best at Sociedad and in the future.
Happy Moyes Is Sacked Day? What the hell..
Cringeworthy thread title, and the constant need to berate and ridicule the man on here is just sad. He didn't do well and was let go, get over it. I wish him all the best at Sociedad and in the future.
That's pretty questionable. Smalling, Jones (or Rojo) and Shaw (or Blind) are a big step up from the Ferdinand, Vidic and Evra of last year. Attack is harder to judge - the main difference is the absence of Welbeck and I don't see how he would have improved us this year. I suppose having him and Chicharito in the wings as back up might have been helpful butI'm not sure either of them would have fit in to the system LvG has installed.
Absolutely - yes. He did have his chance – and he fecked up, mitigating circumstances or not. Football at this level is brutal, no place for dithering, timidness or whathaveya. I have no issues with Moyes getting the boot as such – and I've maintained that stance ever since the news broke.
For me it's a matter of principle, however, to keep pointing out that taking over for Fergie was a bloody difficult task – and that Moyes isn't half as stupid or incompetent as some people think.