I agree. If his job is safe, then it would definitely benefit the team in the long run, as well as maybe in the short term, to give more resposibility to our younger attacking players. Maybe give Januzaj more starts, give Kagawa more playing time and make Nani a key player. Sure it might take a while for them to click, but in all likelihood, they will give us some great attacking play. What benefit does playing Young give us? He's 28 years old, not very good, not very creative, doesn't get anyone excited on the ball, and doesn't really score many goals. Some might say it's playing it safe, because he works hard defensively, and it would be naive to go for it all the time playing a front four of Kagawa, Nani, Rooney and Van Persie, without putting more defensive players on the pitch. However, seeing as 'playing it safe' has resulted in us having 3 losses already in the league, as well as shit performances, I think we'd be better off simply going for it, and at least go down fighting. I think the vast majority of us fans as well would like to see some naivety for once maybe, and put out attacking lineups that will at least make for exciting games. Something like how we were in the 90's, where we had the you score 4, we'll score 5 attitude. Show us that the team is heading somewhere. We more then likely won't win anything this season apart from maybe one of the domestic cups either way, so what would be the harm in giving our more exciting attacking players a bigger role then the likes of Valencia and Young?
I know I'd personally be perfectly fine with us finishing 4th for this season, but playing exciting football and having Nani and Kagawa key players, with Januzaj being given plenty of opportunities as well, but not winning anything. Would probably rather that for this season then 'play it safe' and scrape a cup win somewhere, and just qualify for champions league again next year safely.