Drummer-I guess it comes down to, like everything in life, um...sample size. For you, two transfer windows, 70 percent of one year's regular season games, one CL run, one FA Cup run and one League Cup run is not a sufficient sample size to determine whether or not Moyes is right for the job, or to question's SAF's decision.
As a Moyes-out kind of guy (and I hear you about SAF--yes he forgets more about football when he brushes his teeth in the morning than I will ever know)-I think I have enough of a sample size to come to the conclusion that Moyes is not the right guy for the job.
Doesn't make me a bad guy--or that I'm right. But if I hit myself over the head with a frying pan nine times I don't need to do it a 10th time to realize it's a bad idea. In fact, maybe I shouldn't hit myself a second time. And for me, keeping Moyes is the same as hitting myself with a frying pan after the first time--more data does not provide additional information.
That's fair enough . . I have no problem with people wanting to debate a topic but cannot accept the stance of people who think trusting in SAF wisdom is stupid simply because he is not infallible. SAF view and opinion on Moyes is important and valid in the topic whether the Moyes out people like it or not.
I understand why people have lost faith (or never had it) in Moyes, but right now I trust that SAF will cut his losses (if its required) if he feels the Moyes gamble is a failure. That aside, I personally don't understand the whole "sack a manager if its not going right in first season" syndrome. There are only a handful of managers in the world that could come into a huge club like united and stabilise things. Less managers capable of filling the shoes of SAF.
We could say that Jose or perhaps Anchelotti could of done it, but Anchelotti wasn't available and Jose was not the way the club wanted to go (somebody who would be gone in 3 years). So the club has taken the long term approach and taken a gamble with a manager unproven at this level.
If you accept and awknowledge that he is unproven at this level then you must accept that he was always going to need time to find his feet and grow into the role. You don't have to like it, but his experience is the one thing people keep bashing him with, well after one disasterous season at the club he certainly has one more years experience managing a big club then he did when he started.
He also has the opportunity to get rid of players who simply will not perform for him or respond to his instructions/training/tactics. In all walks of life, peoples personalities can simply clash and they may not get on with certain people, this is true of managers who have better relationships with certain players.
Lastly, I don't believe there is a comparable job in replacing SAF in football. Its not just taking over the management of a club, its taking over a club that was pretty much built up by SAF to a level it never had. The players, the staff, everything about the club is SAF (still is to a large degree). The confidence of losing him alone has been shocking. Moyes is not and never will be SAF, so he needs to do things his way and that takes time.
People keep measuring his ability to succeed in comparison to the success of last season which is understandable and reasonable. However, the club is playing the long game and looking far beyond this season in sticking with Moyes. Its not about simply looking at how poor we have looked this season, its about what Moyes can do to turn it around and make a proper stamp of authority in the summer when he has had a good year to judge all players.