There isn't. Though you can make it a 'near guarantee' if you choose a great manager.There's never a guarantee new management will succeed.
There isn't. Though you can make it a 'near guarantee' if you choose a great manager.There's never a guarantee new management will succeed.
There isn't. Though you can make it a 'near guarantee' if you choose a great manager.
Fergie has apparently been quoted again as saying all Moyes needs is time and the club will be all right.
what else can he say? He chose him.....
Fergie has apparently been quoted again as saying all Moyes needs is time and the club will be all right.
Yup, nobody is bigger then the club, including, fergie. Once he's gone, he's gone. Shouldn't have an impact on decisions regarding the future as it's unlikely they will be the best thought out decisions, thinking more with the heart then head if you know what I mean.Fergie should have absolutely no say on United anymore. He's now the ex manager, so why should he still have power. Its just ridiculous. In what business does a manager of a company retire, then get to pick his successor, and then also choose when/if he gets fired for performing badly?
I love Fergie, and everything he has done for the club, and the amazing memories he has given us as fans, but he shouldn't have power at the club anymore imo. We need a completely clean slate, a clean break, a new era. Fergie still having such authority muddies the water, and makes that new era almost impossible.
Would you rather owners choose a football manager? Sir Alex has been involved in football for 65 years at the top level, and it's right and understandable he has a say in who manages the club. That's not to say he always gets everything right. It's even too early to judge if he has even got Moyes' appointment wrong.Fergie should have absolutely no say on United anymore. He's now the ex manager, so why should he still have power. Its just ridiculous. In what business does a manager of a company retire, then get to pick his successor, and then also choose when/if he gets fired for performing badly?
I love Fergie, and everything he has done for the club, and the amazing memories he has given us as fans, but he shouldn't have power at the club anymore imo. We need a completely clean slate, a clean break, a new era. Fergie still having such authority muddies the water, and makes that new era almost impossible.
Fergie should have absolutely no say on United anymore. He's now the ex manager, so why should he still have power. Its just ridiculous. In what business does a manager of a company retire, then get to pick his successor, and then also choose when/if he gets fired for performing badly?
I love Fergie, and everything he has done for the club, and the amazing memories he has given us as fans, but he shouldn't have power at the club anymore imo. We need a completely clean slate, a clean break, a new era. Fergie still having such authority muddies the water, and makes that new era almost impossible.
Yup, nobody is bigger then the club, including, fergie. Once he's gone, he's gone. Shouldn't have an impact on decisions regarding the future as it's unlikely they will be the best thought out decisions, thinking more with the heart then head if you know what I mean.
Would you rather owners choose a football manager? Sir Alex has been involved in football for 65 years at the top level, and it's right and understandable he has a say in who manages the club.
Yup, nobody is bigger then the club, including, fergie. Once he's gone, he's gone. Shouldn't have an impact on decisions regarding the future as it's unlikely they will be the best thought out decisions, thinking more with the heart then head if you know what I mean.
Fergie should have absolutely no say on United anymore. He's now the ex manager, so why should he still have power. Its just ridiculous. In what business does a manager of a company retire, then get to pick his successor, and then also choose when/if he gets fired for performing badly?
I love Fergie, and everything he has done for the club, and the amazing memories he has given us as fans, but he shouldn't have power at the club anymore imo. We need a completely clean slate, a clean break, a new era. Fergie still having such authority muddies the water, and makes that new era almost impossible.
I bow to your intelligence!Since he was 7...?
Had this appointment been made by the Glazers people would have slated Sir Alex for not being involved.
Jesus H Christ the level of idiocy here sometimes is enough to cause an aneurysm. Some peoples replies should come with a health warning. Imbecile. Pathetic fan. Ungrateful. Spoilt. Idiotic.
If you read my post I did say he can make mistakes. I'm not saying he should or should not be sacked.Probably but it doesn't change the fact that Fergie has made the wrong choice. He didn't get every transfer right either.
I think he has every right to have a voice at the club but we can't afford to back Moyes to the hilt just on Fergie's say so.
Luckily our actual support, by that I mean match goers, remains supportive for now.
Will be interesting how supportive if results continue, Moyes remains in the summer and the time for season ticket renewals come.
Didn't Gill say whoever we appointed , it would be someone with history of success in Europe and England? The mind boggles.Fergie and Bob Charlton should have far less input in naming Moyes successor.
FFS they appointed a mid-table manager who doesn't play good football, hasn't ever won a trophy and has no European experience - it's laughable.
I don't doubt Fergie's genius as a manager - but as a businessman I'm not sure he should be given the same clout as proven, ruthless, successful businessmen - as difficult as that is for more idealistic fans to grasp.
If United spend anywhere near the amount of money the papers are saying and perform on the pitch, the support will be there next season and I'm pretty sure everyone will put this season behind them.
We have a massive fickle element to our support, see the past 600 pages for proof.
Luckily our actual support, by that I mean match goers, remains supportive for now.
For me we give him time, at least a couple of seasons. A few trophy less seasons will weed out the trophy hunting lot.
We have a massive fickle element to our support, see the past 600 pages for proof.
Luckily our actual support, by that I mean match goers, remains supportive for now.
For me we give him time, at least a couple of seasons. A few trophy less seasons will weed out the trophy hunting lot.
To name a few Pep, Klopp, and Rodgers hardly won any trophies prior to their appointments at Barca, Dortmund and Liverpool. Should Rodgers have been sacked last season?Fergie and Bob Charlton should have far less input in naming Moyes successor.
FFS they appointed a mid-table manager who doesn't play good football, hasn't ever won a trophy and has no European experience - it's laughable.
I don't doubt Fergie's genius as a manager - but as a businessman I'm not sure he should be given the same clout as proven, ruthless, successful businessmen - as difficult as that is for more idealistic fans to grasp.
But i dont think its out of the realms of possibility that sponsors would pull out because they want to attract a bigger audience which is done via the UCL
To name a few Pep, Klopp, and Rodgers hardly won any trophies prior to their appointments at Barca, Dortmund and Liverpool. Should Rodgers have been sacked last season?
Figures are just mere paper talk.Talksport were saying earlier that if we spend this 200m plus wages in the summer, we could actually be in trouble with FFP as the loss of income from CL and not winning anything will affect our earning power. Not sure if that us true or not. Hard to say as we have never spent that kind of money in a summer, plus Rooney's new contract. Hope they haven't promised all this money without thinking about consequences. It would just be our luck to get done, while City and PSG get away with it. We don't have a sugar daddy owner who can come up with some bogus sponsership, training ground scheme to cover it.
They were 40 years and all of them were famous for their attacking style of football. Moyes is a 50 years old manager who has a clear footballing philosophy, which frankly speaking will never suit a top club. I am afraid that your comparison fails. Ole would have been very similar to Pep for example (an ex legend who has managed youth categories before for us). Martinez would have been very similar to Klopp (an attacking football manager who kept the previous team for quite a few years in the league before going down). I guess a Pochetino or Laudrup would have looked similar to Rodgers appointment. Moyes is a bit more different. Like when Madrid hired Juande Ramos. I am not saying that those appointments would have been better than Moyes (thoug I think that they would have been) but they would have been much more similar to those who you mentioned, rather than Moyes.To name a few Pep, Klopp, and Rodgers hardly won any trophies prior to their appointments at Barca, Dortmund and Liverpool. Should Rodgers have been sacked last season?
Some of the reports earlier gave the impression the club thought they would be quids in with the new shirt deal, they might have to rethink the numbers the way the season is going.The issue with sponsorship is the lack of leverage in renewing/new deals if we don't have champs league. MUFC will still remain a significant brand, however there will be less exposure for sponsors with no champs league.
I don't remember them being that good last season. I'm old so please excuse me if I'm wrong.Big difference with Rodgers....They played great in the second half of last season and have continued this improvement.
Plus, he didn't make them any worse then what they were when he took over....And he didn't spend 35 million on Black Beauty
We have a massive fickle element to our support, see the past 600 pages for proof.
Luckily our actual support, by that I mean match goers, remains supportive for now.
For me we give him time, at least a couple of seasons. A few trophy less seasons will weed out the trophy hunting lot.