Moyes So Far!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thank you. All I'm saying is its natural when there is a breakdown with a manager and coach that your effort levels are not the same as it is when you have a healthy relationship with said manager/coach.

I do not think its controversial to suggest we have players in our squad not giving their all for the manager.

simply because the players will sense this is their chance to get rid.

Nice attempt at a change in tact. I think you are doing well at proving me correct.
 
So you have a right to call me an idiot? Ok.

I am not meaning they will intentionally lose the game - if that's how it's come across I am not saying that. I am saying that we have players who do not want Moyes in charge, it is not a huge leap to suggest their effort levels are reflective of their relationship with Moyes.
think of it this way, If your team leader is completely incompetent, and the team leader before that was amazing, you're going to find it hard to motivate yourself to the levels you were at when the previous one was in charge.

Also, who edited my post?
:lol:
 
Nice attempt at a change in tact. I think you are doing well at proving me correct.

Maybe I've not worded as best I could have but I know what I meant. We most definitely have players in our squad not giving their all for the manager. Whether that's right or wrong is up for debate but its happening and is effecting results and will continue to do so until one of the parties moves on.

I've not got an issue with debate on here pal - just do not make it personal.
 
There are plenty of ways for players to stick the boot in, other than throwing games. @datura, you were the first to mention that in regards to LonelyFire's post.

Seems the wording of my post has been poorly chosen. See my other posts in an attempt to explain what I was actually meaning. I'm more referencing the effort levels of those clearly not happy with Moyes - and speculating as to how they will respond over coming games.
 
Fergie needs to leave his ego at the door and do what he has done for the best part of 30 years, which is have the best interest of the club at heart.

Backing Moyes now does not and will not alter the fact that he appointed the wrong man for the job.
Very little chance of that.

He's incredibly stubborn and will stick by Moyes, to the detriment of Man United, which is just sad in my eyes.
 
think of it this way, If your team leader is completely incompetent, and the team leader before that was amazing, you're going to find it hard to motivate yourself to the levels you were at when the previous one was in charge.

Also, who edited my post?
:lol:

No idea!

You're right. Going to be an interesting 3 weeks
 
I still find it incredible that Mourinho was overlooked because of past indiscretions/controversies, yet we continue to employ and handsomely pay the likes of Rooney, Giggs and Ferdinand.

The holier-than-thou attitude is just bizarre, and complete double standards.
 
Ferguson has come out and backed him. Does he honestly believe Moyes will turn this around, or is he just trying to protect his ego/pride?
 
I still find it incredible that Mourinho was overlooked because of past indiscretions/controversies, yet we continue to employ and handsomely pay the likes of Rooney, Giggs and Ferdinand.

The holier-than-thou attitude is just bizarre, and complete double standards.

Totally agree . It's also incredible that he was overlooked due to his outspoken nature and history of saying controversial things, with certain united fans giving it the 'it's not the United way' rubbish, when sir Alex was just as bad.
 
Seems the wording of my post has been poorly chosen. See my other posts in an attempt to explain what I was actually meaning. I'm more referencing the effort levels of those clearly not happy with Moyes - and speculating as to how they will respond over coming games.

I that case you're an idiot!

Only joking.
I don't think anyone would be able to differentiate a "protest", half-arsed, or expected performance at the moment.:(
 
It definitely feels like there is a perfect storm forming over Moyes now. I literally cannot see him surviving past next few games.....simply because the players will sense this is their chance to get rid.
Is that a serious post?

You're literally saying players would deliberately throw games to get rid of Moyes.
 
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/fo...ef-says-David-Moyes-should-be-axed-at-Man-Utd

That, according to Calderon, who was Real supremo from 2006 to 2009, would automatically get a boss bullet if he was at the Bernabeu.

The Spaniard, 62, said: “I’d change the manager if Real Madrid finished sixth and failed to reach the Champions League the next season. Of course I would.

“It’s a real disaster in every sense not to be in Europe. Not only in terms of the money you get from playing in the competition but from all your club sponsors.

“Sponsorship deals are linked to the Champions League because of the exposure it has on TV. All deals are affected by being in or out of it of Europe. No question.

“I’m sure there’s no difference in the contracts of Real Madrid and Manchester United.

“They will have to deal with losing as much as £100million - both in lost television rights and the reductions in sponsorship money."

That’s why the club’s financial supremos – led by relatively-unknown Richard Arnold, will decide Moyes' future.

Forget ambassador Sir Alex Ferguson, who along with Sir Bobby Charlton and David Gill, forms part of the club’s ‘football’ board.

For it is the likes of managing director Arnold, who haven the real power to force immediate change in the Old Trafford dug out.

Arnold, 41, is on the main board and a hugely-influential voice among the corporate hierarchy as he is responsible for the club’s fast-growing global empire.

His advice is all-important to American owners, the Glazer family. If he thinks Moyes must go, the NFL tycoons are likely to act.

And it is the potential damage form on the pitch is doing to the revenue streams around the world which will ultimately dictate whether United stick or twist.

United’s share price on the New York stock exchange is still close to an all-time low amid a string of shocking losses under Moyes.

Shares were trading at around £9 last week, way below their 52-week high of £12 in May 2013.

Now the club, and Arnold in particular, are waiting to see what happens on Wall Street in the next month as Moyes tries to revive the team’s fortunes.

But with more than £250m wiped off the club’s value in eight months – it was worth £1.53billion close of play Friday - investors and sponsors are looking for a dramatic recovery.

Should that fail to materialise, Moyes, no matter his support from predecessor Fergie - who handpicked him for the job – is at the mercy of the money men.

That’s where Arnold comes into play as he oversees the running of one of the planet’s mostprofitable sporting institutions.

The financial high-flier had no previous links with football before emerging on the Old Trafford scene.

Twice nominated for ‘UK young director of the year’, Arnold was appointed United commercial director in 2008.

And his remarkable success in that role - against a backdrop of world economic recession - earned him a place on the board and promotion to Group managing director last March
 
Ferguson has come out and backed him. Does he honestly believe Moyes will turn this around, or is he just trying to protect his ego/pride?
Likely both.
He didn't come out to specifically back him though. He was asked about the situation at a private event and he gave a reply which would be standard for any of the club's directors.
 
100 Million? :eek:

Just shows how lucky Glazers were to have had Sir Alex as manager over they years. He's probably saved them and the club from going bust.

Will be even higher when the BT deal fully kicks in. They're worth double the existing contracts. :(
 
100 Million? :eek:

Just shows how lucky Glazers were to have had Sir Alex as manager over they years. He's probably saved them and the club from going bust.

No doubt having SAF in charge saved them fortunes. That spell from 09-12 where hardly anything was spent shows the genius of the man.
 
One often used argument I don't agree with is the clubs ethos/blueprint to give managers time.

Our longest serving managers Sir Matt, and Sir Alex gave the club no real reason to be given the sack. Had they been unsuccessful I'm sure the club wouldn't have acted any differently to other clubs.
 
The incredible thing is, lesser teams than us have won the bloody Champions League.
Exactly. Still I'm pretty sure Rafa or RDM didnt bleed on about how they need more top quality signings to win the UCL. In fact Moyes whole mentality stinks of "the teams rubbish, i need to get players in to be successful" - which for me is damning in its own right that he is more interested in absolving himself of any responsibility than work with what hes got (aka trying to build on something).
 
Last edited:
I can't fooking wait for this season to be over.
What makes you think next season will be any different? Especially if we stick with Moyes, which at the moment looks very much likely.

Throw £100m towards the squad, there's still some glaring issues with the management and the style of play which doesn't look like changing.
 
Exactly. Still I'm pretty sure Rafa or RDM went on about how they need more top quality signings to win the UCL. In fact Moyes whole mentality stinks of "the teams rubbish, i need to get players in to be successful" - which for me is damning in its own right that he is more interested absolve himself of any responsibility than work with what hes got (aka trying to build on something).
Especially when he was sold on his reputation for achieving on a shoestring.
(I am in the club of those that wake up, and check the news, hoping he has been sacked. It's ruining my normal depressed demeanor.)
 
One often used argument I don't agree with is the clubs ethos/blueprint to give managers time.

Our longest serving managers Sir Matt, and Sir Alex gave the club no real reason to be given the sack. Had they been unsuccessful I'm sure the club wouldn't have acted any differently to other clubs.
You're bang on the money here. I cant speak for Sir Matt but SAF was doing a lot behind the scenes that properly saved him from the sack when the team was failing, even when fan support started to waver. Moyes stepped into a good setup but added inept support staff and iPads
 
One often used argument I don't agree with is the clubs ethos/blueprint to give managers time.

Our longest serving managers Sir Matt, and Sir Alex gave the club no real reason to be given the sack. Had they been unsuccessful I'm sure the club wouldn't have acted any differently to other clubs.

It's also not really true. Mcguiness, o'farrell, sexton, and Atkinson weren't given time when compared with their peers at the time. Only SAF and busby were given time - and that's because both had pedigree.

Idea that Utd give time is based purely on SAF and busby - whilst conveniently ignoring those in between the two.
 
One often used argument I don't agree with is the clubs ethos/blueprint to give managers time.

Our longest serving managers Sir Matt, and Sir Alex gave the club no real reason to be given the sack. Had they been unsuccessful I'm sure the club wouldn't have acted any differently to other clubs.

Not so sure most fans agreed with that in Fergies earlier years Sultan.
 
It's also not really true. Mcguiness, o'farrell, sexton, and Atkinson weren't given time when compared with their peers at the time. Only SAF and busby were given time - and that's because both had pedigree.

Idea that Utd give time is based purely on SAF and busby - whilst conveniently ignoring those in between the two.
good point
 
Especially when he was sold on his reputation for achieving on a shoestring.
(I am in the club of those that wake up, and check the news, hoping he has been sacked. It's ruining my normal depressed demeanor.)
TBH i am a little embarrassed to admit first thing i do when i wake up is turn on my phone and check newsnow to see if hes been sacked :(
 
It's not correct for fans to wish/hope for consequences or scenarios which affect the club badly even if your intentions are good.

I would reply to your post however I'm not sure what you've quoted. I looked through my posts to find what I said but I couldn't therefore I cannot recall what I was talking about.

If you could tell me the page number the post is on that would be great.
 
It's also not really true. Mcguiness, o'farrell, sexton, and Atkinson weren't given time when compared with their peers at the time. Only SAF and busby were given time - and that's because both had pedigree.

Idea that Utd give time is based purely on SAF and busby - whilst conveniently ignoring those in between the two.
Unfortunately that re-enforces the vie
Time= success, change doesn't.

It means nothing anyway.
 
100 Million? :eek:

Just shows how lucky Glazers were to have had Sir Alex as manager over they years. He's probably saved them and the club from going bust.
I guess that even with a lesser manager the club would have qualified for UCL consistently. We spend much more than Arsenal for example and they have never missed on top 4. About the titles, I agree. There aren't many (if any) managers who would have won as much titles as SAF did in the last 10 years (with the same amount of money to spend, of course).
 
Not sure Calderon is correct there. Any such clauses in the club's sponsorship deals would have surely have had to have been divulged in the IPO prospectus. His £100m figure appears to have been plucked from thin air; I don't think missing out on the CL will have any effect in that regard.
 
Not sure Calderon is correct there. Any such clauses in the club's sponsorship deals would have surely have had to have been divulged in the IPO prospectus. His £100m figure appears to have been plucked from thin air; I don't think missing out on the CL will have any effect in that regard.
No offence, I'd trust his knowledge of the inner working of a big club over your's. Or mine for that matter.
 
I would reply to your post however I'm not sure what you've quoted. I looked through my posts to find what I said but I couldn't therefore I cannot recall what I was talking about.

If you could tell me the page number the post is on that would be great.
Actually it is my post, but somehow he has quoted you. @Sultan

In principe I agree with you. It wouldn't ne nice to see OT booing Moyes, and neither players going into an open war. Fergie leaving isn't that harmful IMO, though I think I am in minority for that. Despite his success which makes him the greatest person in the history of Man United, I always thought that when he retires from management, it should be a complete retirement. I always was afraid that we will do something similar to what we done when Busby retired, and actually we did exactly that. I always thought that it is a recipe for disaster and nothing has happened since to change my opinion.

Anyway, I think that the end justifies the methods. At the moment (against only my personal opinion) Moyes getting sacked dwarfs any negatives that comes with it. So in some way (while I fully acknowledge that booing and mutiny are a bad thing to happen) I would take that if it means that Moyes won't continue being our manager. Those thing will be forgiven as soon as the new manager improves things. The possible damage that can/will happen if Moyes continues (IMO) will not be forgotten that fast.
 
Not sure Calderon is correct there. Any such clauses in the club's sponsorship deals would have surely have had to have been divulged in the IPO prospectus. His £100m figure appears to have been plucked from thin air; I don't think missing out on the CL will have any effect in that regard.
But i dont think its out of the realms of possibility that sponsors would pull out because they want to attract a bigger audience which is done via the UCL
 
But i dont think its out of the realms of possibility that sponsors would pull out because they want to attract a bigger audience which is done via the UCL

Pull out at the time that contracts are due for renewal yes, but pull out midway through a deal they are contractually obliged to see through? That seems unlikely. The Nike deal has a relegation clause, our other sponsorship deals will be unaffected. Obviously if the club experiences a prolonged period without CL football, it could reasonably be expected to have an effect on United's attractiveness to new sponsors.

No offence, I'd trust his knowledge of the inner working of a big club over your's. Or mine for that matter.

But this isn't about his knowledge of the working of big clubs in general, it's specifically about United's existing commercial deals. They'll be unaffected by missing out on CL qualification for a single season. Here's a summary of the costs the club could expect to incur:

http://www.andersred.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/manchester-united-potential-financial.html
 
Actually it is my post, but somehow he has quoted you. @Sultan

In principe I agree with you. It wouldn't ne nice to see OT booing Moyes, and neither players going into an open war. Fergie leaving isn't that harmful IMO, though I think I am in minority for that. Despite his success which makes him the greatest person in the history of Man United, I always thought that when he retires from management, it should be a complete retirement. I always was afraid that we will do something similar to what we done when Busby retired, and actually we did exactly that. I always thought that it is a recipe for disaster and nothing has happened since to change my opinion.

Anyway, I think that the end justifies the methods. At the moment (against only my personal opinion) Moyes getting sacked dwarfs any negatives that comes with it. So in some way (while I fully acknowledge that booing and mutiny are a bad thing to happen) I would take that if it means that Moyes won't continue being our manager. Those thing will be forgiven as soon as the new manager improves things. The possible damage that can/will happen if Moyes continues (IMO) will not be forgotten that fast.
There's never a guarantee new management will succeed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.