Bear Attack
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2009
- Messages
- 3,779
From the Moyes Everton heat map, I think we're giving him too much credit to suggest he's just respecting our 'philosophy'. I'm afraid this is the only way he knows how.
It seems likely Moyes will be allowed to finish the season and, unless he improbably climbs us back to fourth, he'll be sacked a few days after the season ends.
It's funny because yesterday morning before the game I posted this:He's talking shite. Busby never played that way, neither did Atkinson, Docherty, or even O'Farrell. Where does he come up with this DNA crap? Just another stupid buzzword that he's heard somewhere.
I've wondered this. I remember the game against Leverkusen at OT when Valencia scored and on MUTV they interviewed Moyes after the game and were waxing lyrical about Valencia and the fantastic wing play and the fact that it's part of Manchester United's DNA to play with flying wingers etc. I almost wonder if the 4-4-2 / winger tradition is a burden that he's trying to uphold. I personally think he'd have more joy if he moved on from both. It'll be madness to carry on doing the same thing over and over and expect different results. It's not working.
I'm not too sure. With all the talk of needing to improve the team, especially midfield, and the purchase of Mata there should be less and less of a reason for players such as Cleverley or Ando being anything more than fringe players, same applies to Giggs really. I agree that he can bring something in a 15min cameo as you say, but it's still a big ask to get 40 of them. Besides, there'll be other players in bigger need for such features in the first team, if we're really going to improve our team the competition will be fiercerThere's no reason he can't stay on in his current role for another year or two. He's no less effective than the likes of Ando was or Cleverley is. He usually improves us when he comes on for one of his 15 minute cameos.
The last point about our coaches last year is ridiculous btw.Because the players don't know anything else. You see when Rooney touches the ball he instantly takes a look towards the wing.
It's the way these players are taught to play by their previous coaches.
And I don't understand how Maulensteen and Phelan had the nerve to have a dig at the way we play yesterday. WELL feckWITS, IT WAS YOU WHO DRILLED THIS STYLE INTO THEM.
“The way he (Meulensteen) trains is an exceptional,” Van Persie said.“He is truly one of the best coaches in the world. I have had a lot of good trainers, but it’s the way he prepares our team for games. Every match is different, so every training session in the build-up to games is unique.
“We know exactly what to expect and he wins points for us through his training. We’ve won a lot of games by the odd goal and they are point winners, which we train for. For instance, against Chelsea I scored after a low cross from Antonio Valencia on the right. It might seem a fluke, but the whole week before the game was spent working on that move.
“Another example is my goal against Wigan, when I cut the ball inside and shot with my right foot. Again this situation, we trained on.
There is no evidence from what he's done at United so far, or in what he has said to the media after games, that he feels we are crossing too much. Which we obviously are. This is a man who says he doesn't know what more we needed to do to win...
In a game where we had 80% possesion and a team sitting deep and narrow there are going to be a lot of crosses
Yesterday epitomised it.Didn't Einstein describe insanity as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results? Our tactics under Moyes have been the very definition of insane. No two ways about it.
Over 80 is ridiculous.
If it isn't working, yes.Why? If a player finds him self in a good crossing position should he decline to do so?
Yesterday epitomised it.
Didn't Einstein describe insanity as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results? Our tactics under Moyes have been the very definition of insane. No two ways about it.
Why? If a player finds him self in a good crossing position should he decline to do so?
So they found themselves in a good position to cross over 80 times in a game?
We drew to fecking Fulham.
A shit header from Vidic gave them a point
If we lose 8-0 at the Emirates Mozza will praise Moyes for keeping it below double figures and winning a few throw-ins.Because we were excellent otherwise, as per usual under Moyes.
If we lose 8-0 at the Emirates Mozza will praise Moyes for keeping it below double figures and winning a few throw-ins.
If we lose 8-0 at the Emirates Mozza will praise Moyes for keeping it below double figures and winning a few throw-ins.
Good enough to win it
Should Moyes get a pat on the back because we were ahead of Fulham for a few minutes? They have the worst defensive record in the league and we toiled against them. Hull put 6 past them ffs. A win yesterday would have only papered over the cracks.Yesterday epitomised it.
When it's boiled down to these simple facts it looks increasingly amazing that he's still in the job.I don't know how all of this is going to end but, one thing I do know for certain is, someone needs to step in here and sort it.
-Dire Football
-Dire results-
-Sitting mid table
-Practically out of the running for everything and it's only February
-Moyes calling the players mentally week
-Players coming out and throwing sly digs around on social media
-Least we not forgot some of the odd comments made to the media and the horrendous summer we had
It's a circus at the moment. Needs to be sorted!
Should Moyes get a pat on the back because we were ahead of Fulham for a few minutes? They have the worst defensive record in the league and we toiled against them. Hull put 6 past them ffs. A win yesterday would have only papered over the cracks.
Breaking down a side shouldn't be easy. Nobody expects it to be, especially against sides fighting for survival. But I fail to see how you can seriously defend Moyes' tactics against Fulham. It was beyond a joke, it's a continues pattern. The man is tactically inept, he needs to surround himself with modern footballing men like Ferguson did.Two weeks ago Chelsea couldn't break down West Ham doing the same shit, breaking them down isn't easy
Good enough to win it
When it's boiled down to these simple facts it looks increasingly amazing that he's still in the job.
They should have tried lumping in 82 crossesTwo weeks ago Chelsea couldn't break down West Ham doing the same shit, breaking them down isn't easy
Breaking down a side shouldn't be easy. Nobody expects it to be, especially against sides fighting for survival. But I fail to see how you can seriously defend Moyes' tactics against Fulham. It was beyond a joke, it's a continues pattern. The man is tactically inept, he needs to surround himself with modern footballing men like Ferguson did.
I hate saying it but that's what they are, facts! No one can argue with them and this latest craze of players coming out now and having sly digs has to make the club do something....
And when I say something, I don't mean sack him! This crap needs to be sorted! 76,000 people in a stadium yesterday, spending their hard earning money on that shit??....Did any of you see Vidic walking into the stadium yesterday? I urge you to find the footage!! He could not have looked less arsed if he tried...And then he puts in that performance! The whole thing is a shambles!!
The majority of us can blame Moyes, others can blame the players but, everyone at the club needs to step up, take responsibility and turn this around! We were told it's our "duty" to support Moyes...Suffice to say, we have! We've been very patient with him! More then any other fans would be....So now, it's the club's duty, as a whole, to sort this!..It cannot continue
What like Mike Phelan?
What was particulary modern about Mulasteens tactics yesterday?
You don't honestly expect Meulensteen to produce tiki-taka with a dog shite Fulham side sitting bottom of the league? Also, Phelan was left mystified to our tactics too.What like Mike Phelan?
What was particulary modern about Mulasteens tactics yesterday?
He's love-in with Moyes is quite baffling indeed. There's been very little you could praise the man for yet you'd almost believe he's been good for us from his posts.
What like Mike Phelan?
What was particulary modern about Mulasteens tactics yesterday?