This is no doubt true. But then again how transparent are his steps? We don't actually know what he is doing behind the scenes, all we have are the often dire enough performances on the pitch to go by. And everything that goes on there is bound to be over analyzed and exaggerated as long as the points keep eluding us. The few instances of good football we produce are ignored and forgotten - the stale and unimaginative parts are held up as proof Moyes wants us to play stone-age football, etc.
Why was he hired? He didn't come with Maureen's CV, this is clear as day. The logical conclusion seems to be that he was indeed hired as part of a long-term strategy - not as someone who would have us challenge instantly. In other words, he might be doing exactly what you say - taking a step back in order to take two forwards. He just hasn't started moving forwards yet. How long should we wait before we conclude that he simply is incapable of making these forwards strides? I don't know - but it surely must be longer that seven months.
I've said this before and as a so-called Moyes apologist I don't mind repeating it: it seems clear that he will get money to spend this summer. When he's done shopping and has managed to land a top shelf midfielder and whatever else we need (a new LB, etc.), well - then the time has come to mount a proper challenge. I think that is what both Fergie and Charlton expect - and the Glazers too. Expectations will be high next season. And he needs to meet 'em. If we look anything like we're doing at the moment next season, Moyes is a goner - I'm sure of that. So, in one sense, you could simply ask: what's the rush here? Give him a proper chance to prove himself - and if he can't, he'll be let go. The six year contract was a statement on the part of the club - they won't keep him on for six years if he clearly can't do the job.