KiD MoYeS
Good Craig got his c'nuppins
If he got sacked tonight I'd become excited for the final stretch of the season.
The numbers, percentage-wise, aren't that different from 09/10 to 13/14. I'm assuming that other teams have increased their amount of attacks through the middle in the same period of time, which makes our fall from 5th to 20th in the league possible, despite a difference of only 6%. If that's the case, it shows us regressing while almost all the other teams are evolving and taking on a more modern approach. It would be interesting to see other the other teams' numbers from year to year to see if my assumptions are correct.
Luckily, attacks through the middle aren't necessarily directly related to performance. Unluckily, with wingers who can't cross a ball to save their lives, they are.
That's my major fear - that he gets another season, ends up being replaced and does some damage on the way. But as long as he's here we have no way back to completely back him both in signings and sales.
This summer is going to be the most important summer in living memory.
If he lashes 150m and still doesn't get us competing, then we'll be in a right sh!T heap of a position.
The tiem for full and unconditional support was last summer, give him the cash and then take a watching brief over the following months to see how he fairs. Whilst Moyes and Woodward share blame for what eventually occurred in that first transfer window, the manager has demonstrated little capability of being able to improve even decent players and that must now come into play IMO. Dave is if anything too secure in his position, too complacent that he can buy his way out of trouble rather than working to that end [a laziness which would never have answered the purpose at Everton].
It's not even about winning the games for me right now, I just want to see a good performance. There's no sign of us playing well, or our attacking players clicking, or anything really.
Everything is going to plan. Fergie's successor was always going to fail. Moyes is a patsy.
Yeah, but what do you do? If he comes to the board and says he wants to sell X and Y? Refuse? Say he wanted to sign a player that costs a lot of money, but not a huge amount, say 25m, do we say no?
I agree that he's failed to get the best out of what he already has. Which is part of the reason I would like to see him replaced. Going through a situation where he's at the club but only partly backed would lead us nowhere. It'll just delay the inevitable.
This. I feel like most of the opportunities we make come from set pieces (less so recently, but at the start of the season I feel like almost all of our goals came from them).It's why I'm annoyed when people say shit like "but we've always been about wing play" or "but Fergie did the same".
No, we didn't play this horribly under Fergie, even excluding results. Nowhere near. We never were as clueless, as lacking in imagination and as lifeless in attack. There was always variety of sorts. Last season mainly due to the movement and skill of van Persie, other seasons because of a brilliant Rooney through the middle, or Nani cutting inside, or the Ronaldo/Tevez/Rooney-combo and so on.
The main problem is that we're not creating opportunities in open play. As Delaney stated in another article, instead of blaming bad luck we should ask ourselves: How did we get so bad as to depend on being lucky to beat the likes of Stoke every weekend?
Nobody can defend him for this, nobody.
Man Utd play through centre of pitch: 09-10: 30% (5th in PL); 10-11: 29% (11th in PL); 11-12: 30% (6th); 12-13: 28% (8th); 13-14: 24% (20th)I'm at work, what does the tweet say?
Nobody can defend him for this, nobody.
We definitely tried to get a passing game going last season, we even went with a narrow diamond a few times, remember?Cheers.
What is defined as play through the center of the pitch? I'm surprised we're ranked 6th and 8th in the last 2 seasons... I don't recall much play through the center.
So 76% of our attacks have come from out wide this season, compared to 72% last season. Also worth noting that 72% of Arsenal's attacks and 73% of Everton's attacks come from out wide, (making them 13th and 15th in the PL for attacks through the middle, while Aston Villa are 2nd and WBA are 5th), and no side from the top 4 in last season's 'attacks through the middle' table finished in the top 4 of the actual Premier League table.
So 76% of our attacks have come from out wide this season, compared to 72% last season. Also worth noting that 72% of Arsenal's attacks and 73% of Everton's attacks come from out wide, (making them 13th and 15th in the PL for attacks through the middle, while Aston Villa are 2nd and WBA are 5th), and no side from the top 4 in last season's 'attacks through the middle' table finished in the top 4 of the actual Premier League table.
Being top of that table isn't wanted either, though. Ideally, we'd be situated between 8th and 12th.
Wait a minute.
If this is all true, this stat seems like a load of bollocks.
It is indeed a load of bollocks.
Norwich, Palace, and Fulham are all in the middle of that table, so were Stoke and Wigan last season. Chelsea are currently 3rd.
I dont know if thats entirely true though. The stats dont show you the trend in use of crossing. It doesnt show whats been happening in the last few games. it doesnt show if there have or have not been any changes.All the stats do is prove we've a lack of diversity in our attacking play under Moyes. There's no dimensions to his attacking tactics.
The stats yes. Our style being outdated and focused around our weakness isnt though.
Wait a minute.
If this is all true, this stat seems like a load of bollocks.
I suspect it's too imprecise a tool to use. Some teams attack through the middle because they hoof the ball to the big bloke stood in the centre, and they don't have enough flair or attacking intent to use the wings. In other teams it means they actually play their best football on the floor and use each other to create space and movement at the heart of the opposition defence.
In our case though I think it just backs up that gut feeling that the "get it wide, get to the byline, cross" approach is not only deliberate, it's more pronounced than ever, despite us having players who can use the ball another way.
That should go in the unpopular opinions thread.Moyes is gonna sort the shit out starting against Fulham, and we're going on a run of 10 WINS! Come onnnnn
Or the 'ridiculous football forum posts' thread.That should go in the unpopular opinions thread.
Would want to see where we are in terms of rankings of most crosses for the same time period to form a better picture.
With respect to the crosses stats do they differentiate between crosses from out wide and balls cut back from inside the penalty box?. The reason i ask is because the 2 are quite different and also come from different buildups. I noticed in the Stoke game that we had more balls being cutback from inside the penalty box. Half of those come from balls played through from more central positions to players making forward runs. That in itself comes from more central build up play. Some of the cutback balls from inside the penalty box did come from wide build up play as well.I don't have the stats but someone I know had a look at it and said a couple of weeks ago we were up about 1.5 crosses a game over last season. That in itself isn't much (though there have been some crazy stats like 46 crosses against Spurs or 33 at Stoke, in a windy game), but if you add the fact we go less through the center, you get a team that has less ideas and is more predictable, which makes its crosses less dangerous than previously.