Moyes So Far!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I could imagine RVP going into a sulk, but I didn't think Carrick was like that. Clevs has been mentioned as well, but that might just be him being useless.

Im no expert but something hasn't been right with Carrick all season and it wouldn't surprise me if he was unhappy. Rvp is a definite to be in a sulk. If these players approach the board then glazers have a decision to make.
 
So here's the situation: we are 7th, 7 points behind Liverpool in 4th (makes me sick thinking about that), and our next 4 games are:

9 Feb - Premier League
Man United

vs
16:00
Fulham

12 Feb - Premier League
Arsenal

vs
19:45
Man United

22 Feb - Premier League
Crystal Palace

vs
17:30
Man United

25 Feb - Champions League Round of 16
Olympiacos

vs
19:45
Man United
Spoilered it because of font size

2 of those games should be wins, 1 should be quite tricky and the other should be very tricky. Moyes' consistent rotation clearly hasn't paid much dividends, so should he stick with a consistent lineup this month? Maybe rotate only one or two players a time rather than changing half the side? If he decides to wake up and realise how far behind we are, he really should play a front four out of these five: RvP, Rooney, Mata, Kagawa and Januzaj. Stick to this, whilst using what he can of his CM options and stick with a final choice. Our attack doesn't seem moulded at all, in fact they seem very out of tune with each other, and to maintain this they need a lot of time together. As for the defense, we are so messed up there with injuries and suspension I don't know what to suggest. My point being made is we need a team identity; we don't seem to pose as an attacking threat, or a possession side, or a stonewall defense. If he wants to make our team a defensive unit that concedes and scores little, then shore up our defense and work on our set piece defending, because right now it's the worst I have seen in a decade. If he wants us to be truly ruthless like City can be, then work on our movement up front, and think of different attacking routes than just out wide every time, predictability can be a huge downfall. All of this can only be maintained if he uses one constant XI!
 
We are ultra reliant on our forwards for goals. Fergie spent 30 odd milion on 2 forwards in his last season rather then a midfielder.

And other teams are not reliant on their forwards, midfielders or defenders?

Do you think we had more injuries to key and squad players than Arsenal and Pool for example?
 
So Chelsea, Arsenal and City didn't have injuries? Neither Everton?

How many games have Wilshere, Ozil, Ramsey have missed? What about Vermaelen, what about Arteta? How many points do Arsenal have?

carrick and rvp are our key players in midfield and attack. Arsenal are lucky to not have lost Girout for an extended period otherwise theyd be sunk
 
We won the league at a canter last season with useless players.

Scholes rescued us early on and then Carrick came in to some very good form. I maintain no team has finished top 4 without a midfielder on form.
 
And other teams are not reliant on their forwards, midfielders or defenders?

Do you think we had more injuries to key and squad players than Arsenal and Pool for example?

Yes, especially so in midfield with Carrick being so important to our passing.
 
carrick and rvp are our key players in midfield and attack. Arsenal are lucky to not have lost Girout for an extended period otherwise theyd be sunk
And Vermaelen, Walcott, Wilshere, Ramsey, Ozil, Arteta are not ?
 
wouldn't it make sense then that if things don't get better soon for Man Utd that there'd be even more pressure to react?
 
How may goals did RVP score and how many games did he sit out last year?

He did go on a 10 game goal drought at one point last season in fairness, most of the matches we won. You expect a top manager to cover for a player who is out for a lengthy period.
 
Scholes rescued us early on and then Carrick came in to some very good form. I maintain no team has finished top 4 without a midfielder on form.
To be fair this isn't even an argument. You can make these kind of arguments to try to make a point, but you won't convince anyone.

For example, how many teams have win the league without a striker in form. Chelsea looks very possible to win it this year depite their strikers being useless (and please don't say that they have good attacking midfielders, cause then I'll say that we have good strikers) and are overplaying and winning against City on Etihad.
 
Carrick has been shite this season. A manager worth anything would've had us better than seventh with the resources he'd have. You can't argue that. Moyes had Welbeck, Chicharito, Kagawa etc. all season and he's still seen us below Everton! He's not up to it, the sooner we realize this the better.

Hes the only midfielder we have who can reliably get the ball to our forwards from the back.
 
Scholes rescued us early on and then Carrick came in to some very good form. I maintain no team has finished top 4 without a midfielder on form.
from january in 2005-06 we had to play Giggs and O'Shea in central midfield because of injuries for Scholes and also Smith from that time. We were 3rd back then and finished 2nd with that midfield.
 
Good question. And I wanted from the beginning this. Get the best possible manager, if things go right (chances are high that they'll go with a good manager) then it isn't very likely that he'll leave us. We are one of the 3-4 biggest clubs in the world at the moment. It is harder to go somewhere better. Longevity is something that comes naturally if results are good, you should not ask for longevity just for the sake of it. Great to have a manager who stays here for one or two decades. Only if he is good though.

Maybe people learn from their mistakes. (maybe that person who'll learn is me if Moyes manages to turn this and on 20 years I'll be more calm when we get a new manager).

Mourinho, having already been to Real Madrid and will never go to Barcelona, what's left for him to do if we hired him?
 
Including around 10 games in a row without scoring?

Sure. Are you telling me the leading scorer in the league doesn't change the game by just being on the pitch? Is that the argument? Look, I'm not absolving Moyes here. I now want him gone. But to pretend our injuries haven't played a large part in this is nothing short of will full blindness.
 
To be fair this isn't even an argument. You can make these kind of arguments to try to make a point, but you won't convince anyone.

For example, how many teams have win the league without a striker in form. Chelsea looks very possible to win it this year depite their strikers being useless (and please don't say that they have good attacking midfielders, cause then I'll say that we have good strikers) and are overplaying and winning against City on Etihad.
You could argue we did it in the Ronaldo days as he's not a striker.
 
To be fair this isn't even an argument. You can make these kind of arguments to try to make a point, but you won't convince anyone.

For example, how many teams have win the league without a striker in form. Chelsea looks very possible to win it this year depite their strikers being useless (and please don't say that they have good attacking midfielders, cause then I'll say that we have good strikers) and are overplaying and winning against City on Etihad.

Why is it not a valid argument? As it doesn't put all the blame on Moyes. I'm not even defending him with that statement, I wanted Mourinho and whoever came in needed to correct our astounding reliance on an in form Carrick.

Goals can come from anywhere, central midfielders are the fecking spine of the team and affect every element. You can get top 4 on a decent defence but you can't even do that with a shit midfield
 
Why is it not a valid argument? As it doesn't put all the blame on Moyes. I'm not even defending him with that statement, I wanted Mourinho and whoever came in needed to correct our astounding reliance on an in form Carrick.

Goals can come from anywhere, central midfielders are the fcuking spine of the team and affect every element. You can get top 4 on a decent defence but you can't even do that with a shit midfield
But we got champions last year with a shit midfield and we spend 27.5m on an another midfield and we had two window to address midfield issues.

It isn't even an excuse anymore.
 
Why is it not a valid argument? As it doesn't put all the blame on Moyes. I'm not even defending him with that statement, I wanted Mourinho and whoever came in needed to correct our astounding reliance on an in form Carrick.

Goals can come from anywhere, central midfielders are the fcuking spine of the team and affect every element. You can get top 4 on a decent defence but you can't even do that with a shit midfield

Our shit midfield won the league last season and technical finished 1st the season before that. So your argument is RUBBISH.
 
Sure. Are you telling me the leading scorer in the league doesn't change the game by just being on the pitch? Is that the argument? Look, I'm not absolving Moyes here. I now want him gone. But to pretend our injuries haven't played a large part in this is nothing short of will full blindness.
Rooney was off for large part of last season. In case you haven't noticed he was our best player in the first months when he was scoring out of nothing. Yes RvP, Rooney and Carrick missed some games, but let's not pretend that's the first time it happened to us. Over the years almost every year we had an injury crisis especially in defence, where Carrick figured for not one game.

We have no less injuries than the teams ahead of us. Let's not pretend only we have injuries this year...
 
Why is it not a valid argument? As it doesn't put all the blame on Moyes. I'm not even defending him with that statement, I wanted Mourinho and whoever came in needed to correct our astounding reliance on an in form Carrick.

Goals can come from anywhere, central midfielders are the fcuking spine of the team and affect every element. You can get top 4 on a decent defence but you can't even do that with a shit midfield

I have always maintained - and always will - that our treble winning season was down to an immense midfield, who provided for four brilliant strikers.
 
And Vermaelen, Walcott, Wilshere, Ramsey, Ozil, Arteta are not ?

Non of them are really, Arsenal didn't come into this season needing Ramsey to score a dozen goals, or Artetas presence in midfield, or Walcott at any time. We need Carrick s passing because no one else can, we can compensate some what for Van persie but not when the former is missing also
 
Non of them are really, Arsenal didn't come into this season needing Ramsey to score a dozen goals, or Artetas presence in midfield, or Walcott at any time. We need Carrick s passing because no one else can, we can compensate some what for Van persie but not when the former is missing also
So we're a 3 man team?
 
Non of them are really, Arsenal didn't come into this season needing Ramsey to score a dozen goals, or Artetas presence in midfield, or Walcott at any time. We need Carrick s passing because no one else can, we can compensate some what for Van persie but not when the former is missing also
So other teams don't need their key players?

Missing your best defender and captain, best midfielders and attackers makes no difference? That's in every line, not just midfield and attack..
 
But we got champions last year with a shit midfield and we spend 27.5m on an another midfield and we had two window to address midfield issues.

It isn't even an excuse anymore.

It's an excuse for the results, not for the shite transfer windows. Amount of people making assumptions about training methods and other bullshit when this really is all down to having no midfield, it's as simple as that. I don't see how Mourinho would have got more out of Cleverley, Giggs, Carrick

Again last year we had Scholes and Carrick this year we've had two good games from Fletcher and one or two from Jones.
 
Non of them are really, Arsenal didn't come into this season needing Ramsey to score a dozen goals, or Artetas presence in midfield, or Walcott at any time. We need Carrick s passing because no one else can, we can compensate some what for Van persie but not when the former is missing also

Which is why Arsenal are always competing for the league and we took their best player.
 
It's an excuse for the results, not for the shite transfer windows. Amount of people making assumptions about training methods and other bullshit when this really is all down to having no midfield, it's as simple as that. I don't see how Mourinho would have got more out of Cleverley, Giggs, Carrick

Again last year we had Scholes and Carrick this year we've had two good games from Fletcher and one or two from Jones.
One would say Mourinho would have bought Matic for less than his old pal Fellaini...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.