Mockney
Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
I don't want United to have a ridiculously arrogant public image even if it's due to winning everything in sight.
Erm...I really hate to be the one to have to break this to you...
I don't want United to have a ridiculously arrogant public image even if it's due to winning everything in sight.
Erm...I really hate to be the one to have to break this to you...
He might have picked a good team at the start (not sure if it was the right one per say) but the set-up wasn't great... and his changes only made things worse really - especially taking off Kagawa.
Ultimately, from the 2nd half we sat back and looked to create opportunities on the counter - which is a) not something we should be doing at home and b) not something we should ever be doing against Sunderland. We invited Sunderland to have the ball and come at us, and you can't tell me that was puerly a player decision, because if it was, Moyes would have sent on different personel so we could get on the front font a bit more.
As you say Carrick goes on injured... he could replace him with the defensive option (Jones) the attacking option (Giggs) or the middle option (Cleverley) ... and of course, which does he go for?
To me, making things better would involve actually trying something different... but it's been the same shit for the best part of 2 months now.
Also, if Young is on instead of Valencia, if Giggs is on instead of Jones, do we miss 4 out of 5 penalties?
I really think that Fergie was losing touch with the modern game in his later years. He said in his book that he signed Young to catch up with Barcelona and that Welbeck and Cleverley were as good as Thiago Alcantara. I mean who on God's green earth, educated in football or not would agree with such absurdity?
His transfer activity post Ronaldo was sketchy at best. Football went through a bit of a revolution led by the Spanish in those years and we sat by and ignored it.
It is incredible that he maintained a level of success during those years and with the players that he had but I think that all these things point to a manager losing touch with the modern game. Are we seeing the consequences of that now with limited players and a manager sharing that old school British philosophy, only without those intangible and rare attributes that Ferguson brought to the position?
Hyperthetically of course. But if Fergie stepped in right now and replaced Moyes, pre Mata signing as well......do you think we would get 4th?
Erm...I really hate to be the one to have to break this to you...
He might but it'd be tough. Liverpool are the only team we could catch right now and we have to rely on them dropping points. We'd beat them at Old Trafford under Ferguson though and it'd cut the gap to 3 points.Hyperthetically of course. But if Fergie stepped in right now and replaced Moyes, pre Mata signing as well......do you think we would get 4th?
I really think that Fergie was losing touch with the modern game in his later years. He said in his book that he signed Young to catch up with Barcelona and that Welbeck and Cleverley were as good as Thiago Alcantara. I mean who on God's green earth, educated in football or not would agree with such absurdity?
His transfer activity post Ronaldo was sketchy at best. Football went through a bit of a revolution led by the Spanish in those years and we sat by and ignored it.
It is incredible that he maintained a level of success during those years and with the players that he had but I think that all these things point to a manager losing touch with the modern game. Are we seeing the consequences of that now with limited players and a manager sharing that old school British philosophy, only without those intangible and rare attributes that Ferguson brought to the position?
I think this post is spot on. Fergie did fall a bit out of touch with the direction the game has taken in recent years and Moyes seems just as out of touch but without all of the great other qualities sir Alex had.I really think that Fergie was losing touch with the modern game in his later years. He said in his book that he signed Young to catch up with Barcelona and that Welbeck and Cleverley were as good as Thiago Alcantara. I mean who on God's green earth, educated in football or not would agree with such absurdity?
His transfer activity post Ronaldo was sketchy at best. Football went through a bit of a revolution led by the Spanish in those years and we sat by and ignored it.
It is incredible that he maintained a level of success during those years and with the players that he had but I think that all these things point to a manager losing touch with the modern game. Are we seeing the consequences of that now with limited players and a manager sharing that old school British philosophy, only without those intangible and rare attributes that Ferguson brought to the position?
I really think that Fergie was losing touch with the modern game in his later years. He said in his book that he signed Young to catch up with Barcelona and that Welbeck and Cleverley were as good as Thiago Alcantara. I mean who on God's green earth, educated in football or not would agree with such absurdity?
His transfer activity post Ronaldo was sketchy at best. Football went through a bit of a revolution led by the Spanish in those years and we sat by and ignored it.
It is incredible that he maintained a level of success during those years and with the players that he had but I think that all these things point to a manager losing touch with the modern game. Are we seeing the consequences of that now with limited players and a manager sharing that old school British philosophy, only without those intangible and rare attributes that Ferguson brought to the position?
Fergie had a track record to back him up. Just as the likes of Mourinho, Ancelotti, Guardiola et el have, if they'd been appointed and things weren't working out.
Moyes doesn't have that. He has no proven record of success to back him, and give people a reason to back him.
He was selected by Ferguson, Gill and the board. They looked at his resume, compared it to the resumes of all the other available options, and concluded he was the best man to take United forward. They didn't select him because he was Scottish, or some other idiotic and retarded reason that has been suggested. That, along with his achievements at Everton, are enough for me to place my confidence in him. The board feel the same, otherwise he would be out of the club by now. I understand a lot of supporters and fans feel differently.
He has an alloted period to get things right (maybe 2 years if I'm guessing correctly).
The guy is replacing Anderson with Mata. Thats surely a move in the right direction.
Have you read Fergie's autobiography?
Yes, and it was a useless waste of money, offering little insight into the workings of United while Ferguson was in charge.
Didn't you think it was rather strange that all Fergie banged on about with Moyes was how Scotish he is and how hard he works? I mean, he could have used that as a great way to show why Moyes was appointed, was great skills he would bring to the club. But he didn't. If thats what the best thing about Moyes is, then I don't trust the board or Fergie or Gill regarding his appointment. You say they compared all the resumes but they clearly can't have done, otherwise there is no way Moyes would have got the job.
I haven't read the book. But you'd have to say the huge proportion of the best British managers have been Scottish so it does seem like a valid topic for discussion.What he says about Moyes reads like a response to questions about United's tradition of hiring Scottish managers - and Fergie's views on the possible connection between a certain background and certain qualities in a manager.
We'll win the Champions LeagueOut of all domestic competitions by january, yet moyes is blameless.
I disagree with you that Fergie lost touch with the modern game, I think instead he became hyper conscious of the change...
He was selected by Ferguson, Gill and the board. They looked at his resume, compared it to the resumes of all the other available options, and concluded he was the best man to take United forward. They didn't select him because he was Scottish, or some other idiotic and retarded reason that has been suggested. That, along with his achievements at Everton, are enough for me to place my confidence in him. The board feel the same, otherwise he would be out of the club by now. I understand a lot of supporters and fans feel differently.
He has an alloted period to get things right (maybe 2 years if I'm guessing correctly).
Indeed. The likes of Pirlo and Xavi are doing well on the very top level week in, week out. Scholes had one of the best seasons of his life at the age of 32. Neither Carrick nor Vidic should be considered finished.Moyes has been getting off lightly so far but I really hope his signings of Mata and maybe more can save his Utd managment career
Whats worrying about all of this is that many fans are saying Vidic at 32 years old and Carrick at 32 are past it and that is why we are losing games
But you don't hear too many wondering how Mourinho is able to rejuvenate 33 year old Terry and 32 year old Eto'o to be integral to his plans
Moyes has been getting off lightly so far
He was selected by Ferguson, Gill and the board. They looked at his resume, compared it to the resumes of all the other available options, and concluded he was the best man to take United forward. They didn't select him because he was Scottish, or some other idiotic and retarded reason that has been suggested. That, along with his achievements at Everton, are enough for me to place my confidence in him. The board feel the same, otherwise he would be out of the club by now. I understand a lot of supporters and fans feel differently.
He has an alloted period to get things right (maybe 2 years if I'm guessing correctly).
I'd be amazed if that actually happened.
Fergie named his succesor - the club went and got him. None of this comparison stuff... because as someone has already said, Moyes' resume would not hold up against other "top" managers.
@MJJ That's precisely what I had done when I got to your comment and why i was baffled to see you comment. People arent saying he's blameless. Sorry. Not happening.
Even if they did it on SAF's say so, that is because SAF looked at all the candidates and considered their relative merits before backing Moyes. OK he may not have laid out people's cvs but he would have looked at their experience and character and how well suited they were to the job. He didn't just pick the name at random. Or worse, because he's Scottish.Yeah, a billion dollar company gives the reigns to a bloke, just because his predecessor says so.
Yeah, a billion dollar company gives the reigns to a bloke, just because his predecessor says so.
In the sense that half the fans have been saying what is happening now is not his fault and that Fergie has to accept a lot of blame for the mess etc..these kinds of arguments to take the blame off him.......I mean those arguments are just plain silly to be honest as the buck stops with Moyes as to our current situation but hopefully he can rectify it with the players that come in in January.....Mata is a very good startIn what sense?