Moyes So Far!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Have to laugh at Moyes declaring our title race as not over while his captain confirms we're playing for third or fourth at best.
 
Maybe you should turn this round and ask whether, had we given Pellegrini the job, there'd be loads of muppets on here bleating about how he'd not won any trophies in his ten years in European management?

Answer: Yes.
Probably. There were other relevant criteria though, none of which Moyes met. Attractive style of football? Nope? Champions League credentials? Nope. Massively overachieved with his sides i.e. finished 2nd in the league, took them to CL latter stages? Nope. Proven competence managing a big club i.e. finishing with 96 points? Nope.

And then you'll start to see why Pellegrini would actually have made an ounce of sense.
 
Probably. There were other relevant criteria though, none of which Moyes met. Attractive style of football? Nope? Champions League credentials? Nope. Massively overachieved with his sides i.e. finished 2nd in the league, took them to CL latter stages? Nope. Proven competence managing a big club i.e. finishing with 96 points? Nope.

And then you'll start to see why Pellegrini would actually have made an ounce of sense.

He had a team of superstars, not Everton. Yet still won feck all with them.
 
for those in the "players are s*it, its the glazers fault" brigade, i have two questions and i would like people to answer them honestly.

1 - if Jose was manager of this club instead of Moyes, do you honestly think we would be in 7th place and 14 points off top?

2 - would david Moyes have been given the Chelsea or City jobs, had Jose/Pellagrini got the United job?

i think we all know the answer to both questions is no. anybody who says otherwise, is as deluded as Moyes and thats as deluded as it gets.

Of course the answer to both is no. If Mourinho was in charge we'd certainly be doing better, probably around 4th. Obviously Moyes would never have been given the Chelsea or Citu jobs either. Both of those are quite obvious.

Not sure what your point is though. I don't think many doubted Mourinho would do a good job here in the short term, it was his long term influence that worried people. Besides, I don't think anyone is absolving Moyes of all blame when they say the squad is weak. They're really pointing out that nobody was going to challenge for the league with this squad, and they're right. That doesn't mean Moyes couldn't be doing better though.

We knew when we appointed Moyes that no other top club would've picked him, we only did it because SAF recommended him. At the time though few people were saying we should ignore SAF's opinion and appoint whoever the Glazers felt was best.
 
How many times have we gone to Anfield AND Stamford bridge and come away with nothing, despite putting in a good performance? Loads, its not the first time this has happened.
Rarely, because we rarely put in an actual good performance in those games. Maybe 10/11 at the Bridge where Atkinson screwed us, but we lost very narrowly. How many times did we lose that comfortably, playing well?

I say 'playing well' like I accept that as an accurate description of our performance yesterday. We had a good 10 minutes, then we weren't terrible. We have continued Fergie's tradition of having very low standards for what we consider a good performance, I see. Fergie was convinced we played well every year at Liverpool during our most recent 4 year losing streak when in reality we were quite shit in all of those games.
 
He had a team of superstars, not Everton. Yet still won feck all with them.
And yet when Moyes is handed the reigns at a big team for one single season he drags them down to 7th with tumescent football. Kind of puts in perspective what I mean when I said competence managing a big club... We could've done with someone who'd demonstrated that, and we can see how City are reaping the rewards in comparison to ourselves..
 
Just a little perspective, for those calling for Moyes's head

BebziD3CUAA1zM6.jpg
 
Incorrect. There were add ons that brought the total to 45
This depends on the situation. There are 3 cases from my understanding.

A. The two clubs can agree on a fee.
B. United could have tried to go through La Liga to pay the release clause there is an additional payment involved. I think this is where the 36m figure comes.
C. Give Herrera the money to buy out his release clause and face more payments (i.e. IVA tax) which bring us to the 45m figure.

Either way we entered negotiations way too late if we valued him so low
 
Moyes will still think we've got a chance when we're 20points off top with 7 games left.
 
Just a little perspective, for those calling for Moyes's head
No manager would ever get the sack if clubs had the attitude our manager might go on to do what Sir Alex Ferguson did if we give them 5-6 years. I think the odds are much more on the side that Moyes is not the next Alex Ferguson.
 
No manager would ever get the sack if clubs had the attitude our manager might go on to do what Sir Alex Ferguson did if we give them 5-6 years. I think the odds are much more on the side that Moyes is not the next Alex Ferguson.

No one's asking for Moyes to be given 5 years. The very least he should be given is this summer to sort the team out
 
That article is a bit pointless tbh. It could be summed up like this: "United are much worse than last season". Well, no shit.

The only interesting part was that we haven't even scored a meaningful goal after the 80th minute of a game. That really suggests that the determination and fighting spirit is gone, something I didn't want to believe.


The 10% reduction of play in the final third is probably a partial explanation for the lack of late goals. When behind or drawing, you could count on United to apply sustained pressure for the last 10-15 minutes of the match under Fergie. Spurs is the only game I can remember that happening under Moyes. Instead, we are more often in our own half defending, which is more common by far throughout the match under Moyes.

We played higher up the pitch and far more centrally last season and more effectively. There's also the predictability of Moyes that means the opposing teams know what United will do going forward. It's down to Moyes "tactics" far more than it is the players.

Fergie:
moyes-heatmap-fergie.jpg


Moyes:
moyes-heatmap.jpg
 
I know, I'm just saying, he deserves time, just like SAF did back then.

Cmon mate. These are two completely different sitautions we're talking about. How much time do we give him? 3 years?

Even then Fergie came with a much better track record than Moyes has currently. What has Moyes done to deserve that time? Fergie was getting a lot of criticism back then but what he was being tasked to do just doesnt really compare to what Moyes is being tasked to do.
 
Lets be honest, there is no way Moyes is going to get 6 years like Fergie, just because he has a 6 year contract in hand. For some reason or the other people think that Moyes is definitely going to last 6 years. He will be given a reasonable amount of time and i cant see him being touched at least until Christmas this year.
 
Just a little perspective, for those calling for Moyes's head

BebziD3CUAA1zM6.jpg


So a fan letter that is then rebutted by the paper. Nice.

Also, Fergie was a winner and had accomplished more in his 12 years before coming to United than David Moyes had in 15. Look at what Fergie did with Aberdeen versus what Moyes did with Everton. Nothing Moyes has accomplished hints that he will go on to be a great manager.
 
I agree. I think there is a certain amount of sympathy for him with respect to just what a huge task this job is...taking over from Fergie. However I've noticed these last few days a slight change in tone. If it carries on like this, then I suspect the vultures will be circling much more aggressively soon...

And rightly deserved considering the fact that he is doing a terrible job so far.
 
Cmon mate. These are two completely different sitautions we're talking about. How much time do we give him? 3 years?

Even then Fergie came with a much better track record than Moyes has currently. What has Moyes done to deserve that time? Fergie was getting a lot of criticism back then but what he was being tasked to do just doesnt really compare to what Moyes is being tasked to do.


Again, you're focusing on hard-skills. You're not understanding that the current problem with our players and staff isn't in the feet, it's in the brain. It's a mental thing. Players, staff, fans... we are humans. We don't operate like machines, we don't perform consistently.

The club has effectively lost it's leader. You have to remember Ferguson controlled every single aspect of the club, from a high level. You need to appreciate what impact that has on the running of a club. And you need to understand the impact that has on a player.
 
Cmon mate. These are two completely different sitautions we're talking about. How much time do we give him? 3 years?

Even then Fergie came with a much better track record than Moyes has currently. What has Moyes done to deserve that time? Fergie was getting a lot of criticism back then but what he was being tasked to do just doesnt really compare to what Moyes is being tasked to do.


They must have chosen him for a reason. I don't buy into that whole Scottish thing, Ferguson is too intelligent for that, he saw something in Moyes, that convinced him he's the right man for the job.

Not buying serious quality in the summer didn't help, either. Sometimes you have to overpay to get what you want. The club had the money, but your new executive isn't up to the task, it seems.
 
The other flaw in the comparison is that Greaves mentions players that were bought but who didn't do the shirt justice. Every player at Moyes's disposal has won things with the club, well apart from Fellani. There is probably only Ashley Young in the first team squad regular who you could say has never earned his stripes. Kagawa at a push but he has only been with us for 18 months. 6 of those have been Moyes months too.
 
Again, you're focusing on hard-skills. You're not understanding that the current problem with our players and staff isn't in the feet, it's in the brain. It's a mental thing. Players, staff, fans... we are humans. We don't operate like machines, we don't perform consistently.

The club has effectively lost it's leader. You have to remember Ferguson controlled every single aspect of the club, from a high level. You need to appreciate what impact that has on the running of a club. And you need to understand the impact that has on a player.

You're gleaning that from the above post? What skills was i focusing on anyway?
 
They must have chosen him for a reason. I don't buy into that whole Scottish thing, Ferguson is too intelligent for that, he saw something in Moyes, that convinced him he's the right man for the job.

Not buying serious quality in the summer didn't help, either. Sometimes you have to overpay to get what you want. The club had the money, but your new executive isn't up to the task, it seems.

I agree that we chose him for a reason but I get a little annoyed when people try and compare it to when Ferguson was appointed as if the situations are similar. You can draw parallels in just about any situation but doing so out of context doesnt really help imo.

I appreciate you posting that in an effort to show perspective but it doesnt necessarily follow that it should be a reason for why we give Moyes more time. I'm willing to give him til next January. If it stays as is, then I think he should be let go. If he improves, then I think it warrants him being given more time.

I think answering how much time a manager should be given isn't easy. It's not just a stamp of "you get 3 years! because every manager should get that length of time". You have targets, goals, expectations and performance measures. That way at some point you can draw the line.
 
Why do they give a prize to a letter in which they refute the major point made? Was it a contest of "worst letter of the week"?
 
Indeed: they're good for a joke, that's all. And it's fair enough to joke about it - we deserve that, I suppose.

Still, I'm a bit puzzled by some of his critics. Everyone recognizes that injuries to central players have played a significant part in the campaign so far. Not the difference between our current position and the top of the league - clearly not. But the difference between our current position and that 4th spot most of his critics actually grudgingly admit would be adequate? Why not? We're six points adrift. A couple of wins. We've not lost a single match with both Rooney and RVP on the pitch.
west brom
 
To be honest, it struck me as very similar to when a mid-table team shows up at Old Trafford, puts in a good account of themselves and we beat them comfortably anyway without really having to do much. Don't think that's a good sign.
I disagree. I don't think it was a plucky little performance at all. We didn't have enough which is obvious but performances like that will have a completely different complexion when we have our best players and most clinical finishers back, not to mention the three or four top quality additions that Moyes wants to bring in. I'm optimistic. I think there's something to build on.
 
What?

So we'd be no better off if we had our two best players fit? Numpty.

If they can't get the ball no we wouldn't. Does having them both magically make Valencia cross the ball to them better?
 
If they can't get the ball no we wouldn't. Does having them both magically make Valencia cross the ball to them better?

Rooney has been one of our best players this season. How has he achieved that if he never had the ball?

Even yesterday, the amount of times Januzaj put that ball into dangerous areas would have been easy pickings for either of them two.
 
The 10% reduction of play in the final third is probably a partial explanation for the lack of late goals. When behind or drawing, you could count on United to apply sustained pressure for the last 10-15 minutes of the match under Fergie. Spurs is the only game I can remember that happening under Moyes. Instead, we are more often in our own half defending, which is more common by far throughout the match under Moyes.

We played higher up the pitch and far more centrally last season and more effectively. There's also the predictability of Moyes that means the opposing teams know what United will do going forward. It's down to Moyes "tactics" far more than it is the players.

Fergie:
moyes-heatmap-fergie.jpg


Moyes:
moyes-heatmap.jpg

Is that red spot in the middle on Moye's tactics, from us kicking off after conceeding all the time, which in itself says alot? Because its a little hard to believe that the dot fits perfectly on the centre spot otherwise
 
Insane stat that Man United have same amount of points and same goal difference after 22 games as Everton at this stage last season
 
No manager would ever get the sack if clubs had the attitude our manager might go on to do what Sir Alex Ferguson did if we give them 5-6 years. I think the odds are much more on the side that Moyes is not the next Alex Ferguson.

Bingo. We cannot go under assumption that any manager will come good given time, it's wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.