Ole's_toe_poke
Ole_Aged_Slow_Poke
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 36,846
What sort of defense of the defense is "well they scored on the counter attack". Defending counter attacks is also part of well....defending.
Mourinho never had horrendous midfields because he has the pulling power to attract the players he needs....probably same reason why Martinez got a world class striker at the first go at Everton where as Moyes in his whole time there was not able to attract oneReally? Which Mourinho team can you point to that had a horrendous midfield to come to that conclusion?
And again - being "this far behind" and being legitimate title contenders are not the same thing
Really? Which Mourinho team can you point to that had a horrendous midfield to come to that conclusion?
And again - being "this far behind" and being legitimate title contenders are not the same thing
Mourinhos teams
Mourinho never had horrendous midfields because he has the pulling power to attract the players he needs....probably same reason why Martinez got a world class striker at the first go at Everton where as Moyes in his whole time there was not able to attract one
A different manager wouldn't have made the decisions Moyes did in the summer. Our midfield wouldn't be in the state it is. Moyes made bad decisions in the summer and its costing him.
You seriously think Mourinho/guardiola wouldn't challenge for the title had we appointed them?
Really? Which Mourinho team can you point to that had a horrendous midfield to come to that conclusion?
And again - being "this far behind" and being legitimate title contenders are not the same thing
No, Mourinho wouldn't have contended for the title. Because our midfield is shit. He might have us fourth but that's about it.
And Pep has a job, so you may as well ask about how Busby would have done.
To be fair, Ramirez and Lampard are hardly great. And he has won titles against odds before (UCL with Inter/Porto, league with Madrid). Saying that Mourinho wouldn't compete for the title when he did it always (and haven't finished in a worse position than second in more than a decade) is ridiculous.
His current Chelsea midfield?
I think Moyes and not woody needs to take the flak for the summer transfer window.....I think Moyes had 3 targets that were never coming here with no plan B.....Never in a million years was Fabregas coming to Utd last summer and Moyes was the only one that didn't know that...Ronaldo was never coming either...And Bale often spoke of dreaming of playing for Madrid before the summer started so Moyes really went for players that we all knew he had no hope of getting and it was just painful to watch him continue to pursue these players that clearly were never coming without going for anyone else.....That can hardly be woodys fault............There was some outstanding plan B players out there last summer like Matic, Gaitan, Joao Moutinho, James McCarthy, Kondogbia and Rakitic etc and Moyes didn't seem to have a clue about any of these guys and instead went for a 30 million panic buy in the flop with the mop......thats the same amount we got rooney for and 10 million more than RVP cost!!![/quote]
Transfer prices have went up since then to be fair.
You're talking about a guy who has the ability to bench Mata. Mata would walk into our midfield and immediately be the best midfielder.
Mourinho would have brought in a few good players (better than Fellaini) and he wouldn't ask for a season to assess the squad and get to know the place, he'd put his stamp on the team, the play style, the club, immediately. Moyes seems to want to tread water in his first season.
I just don't buy that any manager wouldn't have challenged - mourinho wouldn't be this far behind.
Aye. Mourinho has worked at big clubs, one no smaller than United and where the pressure is just as immense as replacing Fergie simply because it's Real Madrid, he knows the transfer market and players at the highest levels, he's won trophies and done so in England as well. It's ludicrous to just claim he wouldn't be doing better, even far better, with all that going for him compared with Moyes.
You're talking about a guy who has the ability to bench Mata. Mata would walk into our midfield and immediately be the best midfielder.
Go back to the last page where someone quotes Moyes saying he had three or four targets.
That's not treading water. That's someone fecking up. But I'm of the midset Woodward completely fecked up this summer, you might think it's Moyes who makes the deals. I dont.
Weird because that's not what I did. I just said we couldn't be challenging for the title under Jose.
Nah, I am talking about the other guy. The one who took the team who finished 15 points below us last season and now is 9 points above us (2 off the top).
Yeah, but you're opinion was invalidated on this subject when you started hating Moyes in July for me.
Baines wouldn't have made a huge difference.
Fabregas was unrealistic
(Herrera popped up very late)
Woodward did get him Fellaini.
No, Mourinho wouldn't have contended for the title. Because our midfield is shit. He might have us fourth but that's about it.
Yeah, but you're opinion was invalidated on this subject when you started hating Moyes in July for me.
We're 11 points from the top. You don't think we'd have, say, 8-9 points more at least with Mourinho? That would have us challenging big time.
Chances are he would have actually bought midfielders. Not Fellaini, anyway, because he actually knows the market at those levels. Even without signing anyone I reckon he would have earned us some extra points that would put us near the top three, and therefore in the mix.
A guy who is very familiar with the manager's style of play and is very very good a crossing compared to our current back wouldn't have made a difference? Plain wrong.
You can get anyone for the right price.
So what? He was there for the taking.
There you go. Showing your hand.
A guy who is very familiar with the manager's style of play and is very very good a crossing compared to our current back wouldn't have made a difference? Plain wrong.
Well, we know some of those targets. Baines wouldn't have made a huge difference, Fabregas was unrealistic and Moyes should have provided other options sooner than he did (Herrera popped up very late) and Woodward did get him Fellaini.
To be fair, Ramirez and Lampard are hardly great.
Ramirez is a very good footballer and Lampard scores an atrocious amount of goals from the centre of the park. Both of them are certainly not deserving of your synopsis.
It is too easy to blame the manager. He can only tell the players what to do, he can't make them do it. I see no fault of his today. He put out a very strong team and we were thr ones who looked more likely at 0-0. He made a couple of positive substitutions with Kagawa/Chico and it's up to thr players then.
Just goes to show what a shambles the transition was. Whether it was born out of complacency, incompetence or penny pinching, I don't know.
Between the end of last season(mid May) and the 1 July, there appeared to be a managerial vacuum at the club. Chelsea, City had new managers at the helm who had around at least a month to identify targets. Think this was a big reason for the summer transfer disaster.
I think Baines would make a massive difference. I think you need a LB more than a new CM.
I don't know how often you watch full United games... We can use a new left back, but our creativity level is dreadful. We're really clueless at times.
I think Baines would make a massive difference. I think you need a LB more than a new CM.
I think Baines would make a massive difference. I think you need a LB more than a new CM.
Agreed. Baines is fantastic, but given his age, it would be a wiser investment to sign someone like Shaw (if he'd even want to join United), who could potentially be first choice for over a decade. In any event, Evra has been diabolical and a new left-back must be signed.