Morgan Schneiderlin | BBC: Morgan Schneiderlin is currently having a medical at Manchester United.

Status
Not open for further replies.
:lol: Ffs you're so clueless. You actually think Fellaini is a better option for us in midfield rather than Scheiderlin?

Nah hopefully LVG doesn't plan on doing that stupid long ball tactic to Fellaini ever again, considering every time the other team man marks Fellaini he becomes utterly useless and we are then playing with 10 men. We need more guys with technical ability like Herrera in the team not one trick pony's.

If we don't upgrade Fellaini then we are not getting anywhere near the title.
It's so apparent you're a WUM it's getting boring discussing with you.
 
It's so apparent you're a WUM it's getting boring discussing with you.

How can I be a WUM when you come out with utter rubbish like this?

Are you daft? You want Schneiderlin to take Fellaini's place? First of all, Fellaini works out great there because he functions as a target-man binding a lot of players up, creating havoc, drawing attention, making space for other players (especially Young, I believe Young's great season is heavily related to him playing close to Fellaini). Now, how does Fellaini do this? He's 6ft4 and jumps like a kangaroo on stereoids. Also, he can score goals. Schneiderlin is no goal threat, nor does he bring anywhere near the same aerial threat as Fellaini.
 
:lol: What exactly do you not agree on?

Everything you have posted in the last few hours.

Schneiderlin is a massive upgrade on Fellaini, he can keep possession, make interceptions, create chances, make great tackles and also offer very good physicality along with good technical ability.

Anyway it's 4 AM and I need to sleep so I'll try to put a more detailed response tomorrow when hopefully we get more news regarding this transfer story.
 
Last edited:
Schneiderlin has only been very good in one season.
I couldn't disagree more. He has had 3 great seasons in a row in the Premier League and I imagine was great before that in the Championship and League One as well.

Khedira has also not played for several clubs let alone proved anything with several clubs. You say you don't rate players based off one season but seem to rate players based on the club and national team they play for. He hasn't proven anything at Madrid other than not being very good. I could say the same things you have said about Ramires and there isn't a chance in hell he is a better player than Schneiderlin either.
 
Last edited:
Swine's Tiger, Blind, Matuidi, De Rossi, Verratti, Illarramendi, Khedira, Xhaka, Luiz Gustavo, Nüri Sahin would all be better solutions than Schneiderlin.

Amazing. No.
 
Everything you have posted in the last few hours. Schniederlin is a massive upgrade on Fellaini, he can keep possession, make interceptions, create chances, make great tackles and also offer very good physicality along with good technical ability.

Anyway it's 4 AM and I need to sleep so I'll try to put a more detailed response tomorrow when hopefully we get more news regarding this transfer story.
Yes please explain in detail to me tomorrow why you think Schneiderlin will be an excellent player in the #10 position. I can't wait.
 
I couldn't disagree more. He has had 3 great seasons in a row in the Premier League and I imagine was great before that in the Championship and League One as well.
So you think he has been very good for three seasons in a row in PL? Really? Very good compared to who? His fellow Southampton colleagues? He certainly hasn't been top club level for more than one season. I still don't think he is good enough for us, and the fact that he doesn't have the required abilities that we need makes me 100% sure we won't sign him.
 
So you think he has been very good for three seasons in a row in PL? Really? Very good compared to who? His fellow Southampton colleagues? He certainly hasn't been top club level for more than one season. I still don't think he is good enough for us, and the fact that he doesn't have the required abilities that we need makes me 100% sure we won't sign him.
Compared to everyone, he was just as good in his first year in the PL as he was this year. There is a reason he made the most interceptions and the second most tackles per game in the league in his first season, its because he was very good. No one has made more tackles than him over the last 3 seasons, that with missing almost half of this season through injury. He is quite clearly one of the best defensive midfielders in the league.

I don't rate any of your opinions in this thread so I won't even bother replying anymore.
 
You're such a great poster. Not only are you blessed with knowledge out of this world, but your ability to back up your opinions with this knowledge is just pure text-porn.

I've backed my opinion up many times, you have just chose to ignore and then twist it into something stupid like claiming I called Schniederlin a no10 when I blatantly didn't.

I've said Schiederlin is a better player than Fellaini and would be an upgrade on for the LCM position. I've also pointed out some of the attributes Schniederlin possesses and how our team is currently lacking some of them.

You are already getting laughed at by a few other posters for sprouting absolute nonsense.
 
I dont know why anyone is comparing Schneiderlin to Fellaini. Schneiderlin is clearly a better CM and an upgrade overall although Fellaini provides a hell of a Plan B.

Both are good enough to help us be a title winning side again but i dont think either will get us back to the heights of 2008.
 
I couldn't disagree more. He has had 3 great seasons in a row in the Premier League and I imagine was great before that in the Championship and League One as well.

Khedira has also not played for several clubs let alone proved anything with several clubs. You say you don't rate players based off one season but seem to rate players based on the club and national team they play for. He hasn't proven anything at Madrid other than not being very good. I could say the same things you have said about Ramires and there isn't a chance in hell he is a better player than Schneiderlin either.

Indeed Scheiderlin has been very good for 3 seasons and the last 2 seasons he has been outstanding, ask any Southampton fan who watches him every week and I'm sure they will tell you the same.

His statistics are also just as good if not better than most midfielders in the league.
 
Please God I hope this true. He would be a dream signing for me. He's not flashy but he's effective, efficient at what he does in the MF and gives us steel. Make it happen.
 
I dont know why anyone is comparing Schneiderlin to Fellaini. Schneiderlin is clearly a better CM and an upgrade overall although Fellaini provides a hell of a Plan B.

Both are good enough to help us be a title winning side again but i dont think either will get us back to the heights of 2008.

How about we develop a style of play(In Lvg's case possession based) and try to impose it on the opposition for 90minutes instead of acting like a mid table club using long balls when we are 1-0 down at half time.
 
I've backed my opinion up many times, you have just chose to ignore and then twist it into something stupid like claiming I called Schniederlin a no10 when I blatantly didn't.

I've said Schiederlin is a better player than Fellaini and would be an upgrade on for the LCM position. I've also pointed out some of the attributes Schniederlin possesses and how our team is currently lacking some of them.

You are already getting laughed at by a few other posters for sprouting absolute nonsense.
Uh, Fellaini hasn't played as a LCM. He has played as a wide, false #10. Way closer to a standard #10/CAM than LCM.
 
Keeping my excitement to myself till we confirm this. This would be a great signing. A proven premier league player who has been performing top notch for last 2 season now. Not to mention only 25. <Fingers crossed>
 
I've backed my opinion up many times, you have just chose to ignore and then twist it into something stupid like claiming I called Schniederlin a no10 when I blatantly didn't.

I've said Schiederlin is a better player than Fellaini and would be an upgrade on for the LCM position. I've also pointed out some of the attributes Schniederlin possesses and how our team is currently lacking some of them.

You are already getting laughed at by a few other posters for sprouting absolute nonsense.
And yeah, please show me the instances where I'm laughed at.

Look at your tagline, "Van Gaal is Moyes + 150m", unless it's a joke, you clearly have no deep knowledge of Van Gaal and his football philosophy and how he has performed/developed it over his career. And then in this thread, you deny my post saying that Fellaini has worked out great this season because of his physicality which he uses to draw attention and work as a target man in situations where the team is under pressure, as well as his ability to score goals and provide an aerial threat if we were to cross. I'm sure 99% of posters here agree with me on this, and you call it absolute nonsense. That's too funny.
 
Uh, Fellaini hasn't played as a LCM. He has played as a wide, false #10. Way closer to a standard #10/CAM than LCM.
Which means that signing this guy (a central midfielder) shouldn't be hindered by us having a Fellaini (a CAM/no. 10).
 
How about we develop a style of play(In Lvg's case possession based) and try to impose it on the opposition for 90minutes instead of acting like a mid table club using long balls when we are 1-0 down at half time.

There should always be a Plan B imo. Fellaini is not purely a long ball target man anyway, he is a half decent footballer as well. Surely you saw the job he did against Fabregas this season.
 
Which means that signing this guy (a central midfielder) shouldn't be hindered by us having a Fellaini (a CAM/no. 10).
Please read this post:

There are too many people on here wanting us to sign Schneiderlin (@Hostekule @SonnyTheHaloPro ) so I have decided to bother making a long post on why he doesn't fit in at all.

Just to make a couple of things clear; Van Gaal requires two defensive orientated midfielders in his team in order to achieve balance, it is a known fact. Last season, we saw a trio of Carrick, Herrera and Fellaini functioning well. I assume Carrick and Fellaini were the two defensive orientated midfielders (although Fellaini played in a very advanced position, but his immense work rate compensated for it). He could switch Fellaini with Rooney because Rooney tracks back and works a lot defensively too. Herrera did a good defensive effort too, so it was balanced even though Rooney and Fellaini (at times) were only partially defensively orientated. The midfield was balanced.

What happened when Carrick got injuried? Our performances got a lot worse. Why? Because he brought the vital passing skills into the midfield trio. If we were to replace Carrick with Schneiderlin (something that will never happen), we need the creativity and passing skills from elsewhere. Herrera is arguably our best midfielder so he'll have one of the three spots. Some say that Mata or Di Maria or whoever will get the third spot so the trio will consist of Schneiderlin, Herrera and Mata/Di Maria. There are two problems with this trio. Firstly, it isn't balanced enough. There are only one and a half defensively orientated players. Secondly, it forces Rooney away from the midfield. Why is this a bad thing you ask? Because if we are going to rely on Rooney playing striker for the majority of the games next season, we are going to struggle. Why? Keep on reading.

Van Gaal had a conversation with Rooney before this season. He told Rooney how his strikers (mentioning Ivica Olic) used to only have 10-12 touches a game. Rooney was like woot? He then said that Olic used to score two goals a game. It was obviously an exaggeration, but he made it clear for Rooney how he wants his strikers to always roam around the oppositions centre backs, looking to make runs into space and not dropping deep. Rooney isn't a LVG-poacher at all. He needs to be involved and that's why it won't work out playing him as our regular striker next season. Notice that Rooney actually played as a LVG-poacher in his games as a striker earlier this season. He was barely involved and got a lot of (undeserved) stick here on the caf because of that. Him not being involved wasn't (or won't going to be) the problem. The problem is that he isn't as consistent in his goal scoring as he was in his earlier years (mainly because he has lost some acceleration in my opinion). We need a top class poacher like Lacazette.

Therefore, Rooney has to play as the advanced midfielder in the trio next season. He'll be partnered with Herrera. If we were to play Schneiderlin behind them, we'd struggle even more creating chances next season than we did this season.
 
And yeah, please show me the instances where I'm laughed at.

Look at your tagline, "Van Gaal is Moyes + 150m", unless it's a joke, you clearly have no deep knowledge of Van Gaal and his football philosophy and how he has performed/developed it over his career. And then in this thread, you deny my post saying that Fellaini has worked out great this season because of his physicality which he uses to draw attention and work as a target man in situations where the team is under pressure, as well as his ability to score goals and provide an aerial threat if we were to cross. I'm sure 99% of posters here agree with me on this, and you call it absolute nonsense. That's too funny.

:lol:

As of right now that is a normative statement, unless you can right now prove it otherwise then you need to pipe down.


However since this is going in circles I'm not going to reply to you again because you clearly have so much insight and wisdom in regard to Van Gaal and his philosophy.
 
:lol:

As of right now that is a normative statement, unless you can right now prove it otherwise then you need to pipe down.


However since this is going in circles I'm not going to reply to you again because you clearly have so much insight and wisdom in regard to Van Gaal and his philosophy.
Agreed. Your perception of Man United, Van Gaal, football in general and probably values in life too are so different from mine that I feel our discussion has reached an end. Anyway, it was great fun to read your peculiar denial of logic and your unrealistic wishes.
 
Is Canal plus deemed reliable in France? Julien Laurens tweeted their suggestion about Schneiderlin.
 
Please read this post:
I don't disagree with you that we need better passes. However, your assumption of Fellaini being one of our two defensive midfielders and fellaini's work rate making that possible, is incorrect. Fellaini is in no way a defence minded midfielder for us. He's an attacking midfielder who tackles a bit. There's no anticipation, positional sense, and very little proper defensive work from him. In fact his best work is coming almost in a second striker position. For me he doesn't impact our central midfield buys at all.
 
I don't disagree with you that we need better passes. However, your assumption of Fellaini being one of our two defensive midfielders and fellaini's work rate making that possible
There's a difference between defensive midfielders and defensively orientated midfielders. The latter means that the players are balancing the game tracking back when needed. I don't rate Fellaini at DM at all just to make that clear.
 
There's a difference between defensive midfielders and defensively orientated midfielders. The latter means that the players are balancing the game tracking back when needed. I don't rate Fellaini at DM at all just to make that clear.
You're talking about every midfielder on the planet. They can all do some defending. Unless you're talking about semi forwards like mata.

I personally think we need two things in midfield. Tackling and technical ability. Whether that comes in the form of a deep lying playmaker and a proper box to box midfielder, or a destroyer and a playmaker who doesn't sit very deep, depends on the options. Fellaini for me is neither. He's that other option you use to bully teams IMO. He's not got the general class that a Manchester United proper midfielder should have but he's got the physicality and goals to hurt teams. So while he should stay I don't think he affects what we need from midfield. He's neither a real box to box midfielder, he's not defensively excellent and he's not a playmaker.
 
You're talking about every midfielder on the planet. They can all do some defending. Unless you're talking about semi forwards like mata.

I personally think we need two things in midfield. Tackling and technical ability. Whether that comes in the form of a deep lying playmaker and a proper box to box midfielder, or a destroyer and a playmaker who doesn't sit very deep, depends on the options. Fellaini for me is neither. He's that other option you use to bully teams IMO. He's not got the general class that a Manchester United proper midfielder should have but he's got the physicality and goals to hurt teams. So while he should stay I don't think he affects what we need from midfield. He's neither a real box to box midfielder, he's not defensively excellent and he's not a playmaker.
Don't you get it? Many midfielders like Yaya Toure are not defensively orientated. They don't always track back. They focus on attacking, not defending. They don't count the number of opposing attackers compared to defenders. Look at our 4-2 match against City. A major reason why we won was because City expected Yaya Toure to track back, but because he isn't a defensively orientated midfielder (he was two years ago, but he has changed his game especially this season), Man City's team wasn't balanced. Milner was forced to track back way more than their plan was from the start which also helped us a lot.
 
Don't you get it? Many midfielders like Yaya Toure are not defensively orientated. They don't always track back. They focus on attacking, not defending. They don't count the number of opposing attackers compared to defenders. Look at our 4-2 match against City. A major reason why we won was because City expected Yaya Toure to track back, but because he isn't a defensively orientated midfielder (he was two years ago, but he has changed his game especially this season), Man City's team wasn't balanced. Milner was forced to track back way more than their plan was from the start which also helped us a lot.
Yaya is a joke these days. He doesn't even count as a midfielder.
 
Uh, Fellaini hasn't played as a LCM. He has played as a wide, false #10. Way closer to a standard #10/CAM than LCM.

At the moment we play with a midfield that looks a bit like this:
Carrick
Herrera - Fellaini
However, there is a better than reasonable chance that that shape will change to that of a forward facing triangle (a shape LVG has used many times in the past). Something like:

Carrick - Schneiderlin
Herrera
Scheiderlin is a better footballer than Fellaini. The only way Fellaini gets a place in the team ahead of Schneiderlin if if we keep our current shape and planned to keep using Fellaini/Schneiderlin in that false #10 role. We'd never use Schneiderlin in that way though so it's a false comparison. We'd expect different things from them as they would basically have different roles, except the team as a whole would perform better with the second midfield shape (Schneiderlin included).
 
At the moment we play with a midfield that looks a bit like this:
Carrick
Herrera - Fellaini
However, there is a better than reasonable chance that that shape will change to that of a forward facing triangle (a shape LVG has used many times in the past). Something like:

Carrick - Schneiderlin
Herrera
Scheiderlin is a better footballer than Fellaini. The only way Fellaini gets a place in the team ahead of Schneiderlin if if we keep our current shape and planned to keep using Fellaini/Schneiderlin in that false #10 role. We'd never use Schneiderlin in that way though so it's a false comparison. We'd expect different things from them as they would basically have different roles, except the team as a whole would perform better with the second midfield shape (Schneiderlin included).
Yes, you're quite right. Pairing Schneiderlin with Carrick would be the best solution if we go for him, but like I've mentioned, it would mean that Rooney will play as a striker next season which I don't think is ideal at all because he doesn't score enough goals these days. However, I think he can develop into a great LCM/#10/Fellaini position. What he needs to do is to stop pumping the ball out wide to Valencia and then run in to the box expecting a cross. It worked under SAF and Moyes, but we rarely cross the way Rooney is used to these days. I think and hope Rooney will be used as an attacking midfielder and will develop his game under Van Gaal, because sadly as a captain he will play every game and won't be dropped (which is stupid).

I'd prefer
-------Carrick
Herrera
-------------Rooney

a lot more than
Carrick - Schneiderlin
------Herrera
 
He's the sort of midfielder we need. Someone whose can win the ball and add some steel in midfield without spoiling our ball possession
 
Haven't seen much of him other than against United and a few games here and there so, is he ready to make the step up to C.L football?
 
Haven't seen much of him other than against United and a few games here and there so, is he ready to make the step up to C.L football?
He plays for the French national team already, he'll be fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.