Walters_19_MuFc
Full Member
Seen a few of comparisons with Carrick, and I just don't see it.
Carrick's biggest attribute (and the primary reason why he's sorely missed in the starting XI) is his ability to control the rhythm of the match - he has an innate clock which allowes him to retain the ball with consummate ease when we need to lower the tempo, or spread it efficiently to more attacking players when we need to go on the offensive. There are very few players who can do that on a consistent basis, and even fewer who offer a similar degree of defensive astuteness. He is essentially a #6 Xabi Alonso type of player whose forte is his excellent passing range from deeper areas, alongwith great positional awareness to shore up the defensive third of the pitch - which makes him an ideal 'defensive' midfielder for our system.
Schneiderlin on the other hand, is stylistically like Blaise Matuidi or even a watered down version of Vidal - a turbocharged, versatile, primarily box-to-box #8 midfielder who provides a bit of everything, has very few weaknesses to his game, but might not be able to influence the game in which Carrick can. So the thing is, even if we do sign him, Van Gaal will still need someone who can replace Carrick as the subsidiary playmaker of the team for the longer term. Essentially Schneiderlin is more like Van Gaal's alternate to Strootman, someone who could potentially dislodge Fellaini and maybe bring more defensive balance to the team - in the way Owen Hargreaves did for Fergie's European Cup winners. Infact Hargreaves might be the perfect stylistic and functional comparison for Schneiderlin, rather than Carrick.
This. Good post.