Devil may care
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2010
- Messages
- 35,976
My one nagging worry is that LvG will think Schweinsteiger is enough for one season while he waits to see how his boy Strootman recovers.
Schneiderlin is the future for us (10 years possibly), while Schweinsteiger is a couple / few seasons at best & his injury record doesnt give confidence that he'll be available all the time either.
My one nagging worry is that LvG will think Schweinsteiger is enough for one season while he waits to see how his boy Strootman recovers.
It's exactly opposite but I believe Schweini could be shifted to deep playmaking role and Schneidy's very comfortable as b2b. Fellaini is unique player, in fact irreplacable.. Witch Schneiderlin as 6 we are going to play wonderful dynamic football again. Witch Schweinsteiger it's a big question where he eventually fits for VGThe fact that they are not playing the same roles lead me to believe that it's not one or the other but both. I have seen people place Schweinsteiger next to Herrera with Carrick behind them, but that's where Guardiola used him and that's where he isn't perfectly comfortable.
In my opinion Schweinsteiger and Carrick are options for the same position and Schneiderlin is Fellaini replacement, while Fellaini might be a striking option.
It's exactly opposite but I believe Schweini could be shifted to deep playmaking role and Schneidy's very comfortable as b2b. Fellaini is unique player, in fact irreplacable.. Witch Schneiderlin as 6 we are going to play wonderful dynamic football again. Witch Schweinsteiger it's a big question where he eventually fits for VG
Just to offer another perspective to the thread.Everyone seems to believe it's such an easy and obvious deal but we're going 3 weeks since our last offer to him.Something is happening that we don't know.Mind you we might finally fulfill our little wet dream of signing De Jong...
Schneiderlin is 5 years younger than Schweinsteiger and nowhere near the same class.
urm ... errr ..... actually ..... now it's confirmed on for Monday next week ....
If it was the case the club wouldn't have made an offer for Schneiderlin.
when did Fellaini play as no6 for us last season? he was used as no10-ish where he's the most useful by far, even you must see that. Schneiderlin would be replacement for Carrick while capable of playing with him in the side too.Opposite? Schneiderlin will be Fellaini numerical replacement with Herrera playing higher.
when did Fellaini play as no6 for us last season? he was used as no10-ish where he's the most useful by far, even you must see that. Schneiderlin would be replacement for Carrick while capable of playing with him in the side too.
We need Schneiderlin much more than Steiger that's almost holly fact, I don't think you've seen them play enough games to throw such statements if you think otherwise. Schneiderlin is almost like more defensive and better version of Strootman.. I agree with Herrera playing higher though
You didn't understood what I said, I mean that:
Schneiderlin--Herrera
----Schweinsteiger
And Schneiderlin isn't a n°6, he is a box to box, a sort of Strootman.
sorry but you should be more clear then, I was never counting with both players, still think it's either one or another even they are different players Van Gaal may want to convert Sweinsteigger more if we are interested at all but we will see, we must wait on it. Schneiderlin sit back a lot last season and he proved he can paly as no6 when he played without Wanyama, he's perfect player to break up play and set up counterattacks..
Schneiderlin
Herrera - DiMaría
is my personal dream, we are not far away from it I guess unlike from signing both players..
The fact that they are not playing the same roles lead me to believe that it's not one or the other but both.
So I was going to make a Schneiderlin gif but got rick roll'd today and this was the outcome:
Huh?
re the Schneiderlin saga, it wouldn't be the first time two clubs have pushed negotations of a transfer fee close to the end of the window and it won't be the last. If it wasn't for the relentless scrutiny of this thread and online media in general, nobody would give a toss about the dates of the various offers being made. It's certainly a terrible way to decide whether or not a manger really wants to sign the player concerned.
must have skipped that, sorry about that.. anyway it's very far away to acquire both I guess so I think the predicting btoh players in the lineup is kinda waste of time I feel. Both are strong midfielders with different style and abilities but for someone like Van Gaal it can be enough..I said both players, try to read a little bit.
I agree with all that but the only thing I don't get is if we know a deal can be done then why wait? The most ideal scenario would be to have signed Scheiderlin this week and him go on tour with us and have his full preseason here.
This reminds me a lot of us signing Blind last summer, and I'm still not entirely sure why we waited until the last possible second to do that.
Which makes perfect sense if you know it's a one horse race.To try and save a few million quid? It seems like feck all, in the context of transfer fees but it's still a lot of money. Could add 20-40k to the weekly salary we can offer Schweinsteiger, for example.
My only explanation is that we're trying to move into the 21st century by becoming sustainability warriors.This is abit depressing. So what happened to the United rep that was sent to the South Coast? Has he arrived yet?
I know but sadly, it seems as if we've gone off the boil with trying to sign Schneiderlin. Maybe we used the Schneiderlin bid, to put pressure on Schweinsteiger to join us.This would be a big mistake given his injury record in the past couple of years and our injury luck.
I'm baffled by all Schweinsteiger is too old stuff. At the end he's established player who only last year had one more serious injury otherwise I don't think he can be called injury prone.I'm baffled by this post!
Different types of players, but Schneiderlin is the type we need most & he can be developed into a better player with us - that's what we do..
Its clear we are not pursuing Schneiderli,and i guess we are making a major blunder by not doing that.
I'm baffled by all Schweinsteiger is too old stuff. At the end he's established player who only last year had one more serious injury otherwise I don't think he can be called injury prone.
Schneiderlin is 5 years younger. If we go by the same logic and we have 10 years off him, while we can get 5 good from Schweinsteiger I'd happily take the latter.
Schneiderlin has the potential and can become better, but I pretty much doubt he can be good as Schweinsteiger(I know they are different players). I think a midfield of Herrera/Schweinsteiger/Mata(or Carrick/Blind if it needs to be more defensive) is much better now than whatever formation we use Schneiderlin in.
Yes Schweinsteiger doesn't have 10 years ahead of him, but we can bring another midfielder in after 3-4 I don't see the issue in there.