Not true, why post without checking the facts first?
No context? You are ignoring context and base your opinion mostly on the "eye-test". First, Suarez' Liverpool were more attack-minded, maybe because they could not defend and had to score goals. They scored 101 goals in the league season 13/14 vs 84 goals season 17/18. Was it because Suarez was more influential than Salah? Numbers don't support such a theory.
Suarez contributed directly to 43% of the goals whereas Salah did it for 50% of all goals.
And it's quite important that Salah was doing it while playing more games than Suarez. It's one thing to play once a week in the domestic league alone, it's another to play both in the league and the CL. What's more, Salah didn't score in spurts like Suarez who scored many goals against relegation fodder and hardly scored against the top teams. In contrast, Salah was scoring on a regular basis both against small and big teams. That's context for you.
Suarez scored only 5 goals in the last 10-12 games when the title was decided and lost, Salah was freely scoring and assisting in the final stages of the CL. That adds to context too.
It's notoriosly problematic to rely only on one's perception ("eye-test") and ignore stats because perception is dependent on various cognitive biases. There are no cold numbers showing that Suarez did significantly better than Salah. If anything, the opposite is true.
at you playing the racist card with Salah. He gets such a kid glove treatment from the media and you're here making excuses for him and crying about racism.
