Miscellaneous Reserve/Youth News

Based on what?

His players love working with him.

The parents say he is excellent with them.

The club rate him highly.

His results have been exceptional.

It's much more than simply motivation. There is coaching, leadership, tactics, communication, feedback, one-to-one development teamwork amongst other things.

Hard to get that all right by being average or lucky.

What does being likeable have anything to do with his tactics and level of coaching though?

I think he is a brilliant motivator. He makes sure his sides work hard first and foremost. That should be the minimum expected of any team, but it often isn't.

He does well at this level with an excellent infrastructure around him.

I think nearly any decent manager can do a job at this level at United.
 
What does being likeable have anything to do with his tactics and level of coaching though?

I think he is a brilliant motivator. He makes sure his sides work hard first and foremost. That should be the minimum expected of any team, but it often isn't.

He does well at this level with an excellent infrastructure around him.

I think nearly any decent manager can do a job at this level at United.
Mostly agree with this. Joyce is a traditional English coach who grinds out results but I don't think he is particularly outstanding at developing players, especially expansive/technical players. You look at the amount of talent that have come into his teams over the years and his track record is not as good as a simple trophy list would make indicate.
 
We play against poor Lancashire teams and the likes of Chelsea who have already loaned out the majority of their best U23 players. Solksjaer did well in this position also. Now look at him.

Joyce is an old fashioned person. A throwback to the mid 90's. He remind of Nigel Pearson. He's good at what he does at this level, but we often have far more talented players than the opposition.

Nice of you to give your pal a pass on his insights into what Phelan did on the training ground though.
We play against the u23 sides of other premier league teams not just poor Lancashire teams and teams who have loaned out their best players. We also loan out our best u23 players who aren't going to be involved with the first team so saying that about Chelsea was a bit pointless. You say Joyce is an old fashioned person but is that based on any actual knowledge of him as a person or are you just making assumptions since you also said the new generation of players are overpaid and immature and don't react well to that type of person but you could describe under 23s players the same way yet the players he has worked with love working with him and speak about how much he helped them develop as people as well as footballers. He takes naive young players develops them tactically and mentally and makes them ready for first team football which is one of the hardest things to do in football and has provided success year on year despite having a constantly changing and usually completely unbalanced set of players to choose from. He teaches players how to be professional and how to get results even when not at your best which serves players well in senior football so to claim he's just an old fashioned motivator is doing him a huge disservice.
 
We play against the u23 sides of other premier league teams not just poor Lancashire teams and teams who have loaned out their best players. We also loan out our best u23 players who aren't going to be involved with the first team so saying that about Chelsea was a bit pointless. You say Joyce is an old fashioned person but is that based on any actual knowledge of him as a person or are you just making assumptions since you also said the new generation of players are overpaid and immature and don't react well to that type of person but you could describe under 23s players the same way yet the players he has worked with love working with him and speak about how much he helped them develop as people as well as footballers. He takes naive young players develops them tactically and mentally and makes them ready for first team football which is one of the hardest things to do in football and has provided success year on year despite having a constantly changing and usually completely unbalanced set of players to choose from. He teaches players how to be professional and how to get results even when not at your best which serves players well in senior football so to claim he's just an old fashioned motivator is doing him a huge disservice.

This

He will be missed if he takes the job at Hull.
 
We play against the u23 sides of other premier league teams not just poor Lancashire teams and teams who have loaned out their best players. We also loan out our best u23 players who aren't going to be involved with the first team so saying that about Chelsea was a bit pointless. You say Joyce is an old fashioned person but is that based on any actual knowledge of him as a person or are you just making assumptions since you also said the new generation of players are overpaid and immature and don't react well to that type of person but you could describe under 23s players the same way yet the players he has worked with love working with him and speak about how much he helped them develop as people as well as footballers. He takes naive young players develops them tactically and mentally and makes them ready for first team football which is one of the hardest things to do in football and has provided success year on year despite having a constantly changing and usually completely unbalanced set of players to choose from. He teaches players how to be professional and how to get results even when not at your best which serves players well in senior football so to claim he's just an old fashioned motivator is doing him a huge disservice.

He wears shorts in the freezing cold to emphasise his manliness. He is old school; cover your bases and then build from there. I don't know why people see that as a criticism. It's one of his best traits.

Again, who said he wasn't likeable? I'm talking about from a tactical and technical level.

There's a big difference between giving an 18 year old apprentice stern advice and applying the same method with a player like Demarai Gray at Leicester, for example. Not that he's bad lad, I'm just using him as an example because he's been playing and likely earning good money from a very early age.

Our players learn about professionalism in The Academy setup before he gets to manage most of them. They are taught about the history of United quite young and travel + prepare for FA Youth Cup games like the first team would. Players should be disciplined from an early age. I think it's wrong to credit Joyce as the main reason for our lads having a good attitude most of the time. We were producing players before Joyce and will continue to do so after he's gone.

Why are you painting them as naive? A lot of them get a good education in the classroom before graduating as scholars. Didn't Welbeck receive exempalry GCSE results during his time here? They have good people around them in their own homes too.

My point is that I think we can replace Joyce when he does decide to leave for a new adventure. It's not as if it will be like losing a character like Eric Harrison.
 
He wears shorts in the freezing cold to emphasise his manliness. He is old school; cover your bases and then build from there. I don't know why people see that as a criticism. It's one of his best traits.

Again, who said he wasn't likeable? I'm talking about from a tactical and technical level.

There's a big difference between giving an 18 year old apprentice stern advice and applying the same method with a player like Demarai Gray at Leicester, for example. Not that he's bad lad, I'm just using him as an example because he's been playing and likely earning good money from a very early age.

Our players learn about professionalism in The Academy setup before he gets to manage most of them. They are taught about the history of United quite young and travel + prepare for FA Youth Cup games like the first team would. Players should be disciplined from an early age. I think it's wrong to credit Joyce as the main reason for our lads having a good attitude most of the time. We were producing players before Joyce and will continue to do so after he's gone.

Why are you painting them as naive? A lot of them get a good education in the classroom before graduating as scholars. Didn't Welbeck receive exempalry GCSE results during his time here? They have good people around them in their own homes too.

My point is that I think we can replace Joyce when he does decide to leave for a new adventure. It's not as if it will be like losing a character like Eric Harrison.
So you complained about someone making assumptions then do exactly that yourself while also ignoring what people who actually know Joyce and have worked with him on a daily basis say.

If Joyce had only ever worked with 18 year old apprentices you might have a point but he has worked with plenty of players who have been on big contracts and have been in or around the first team just as Gray is and most have given him a lot of credit for helping them develop and making them ready for first team football.

There's a big difference between being disciplined and learning how to actually make it as a professional player and Joyce does a good job of preparing players for what it takes to actually be a senior footballer.

I'm not painting them as naive it's a fact that many of the players who have come up from the under 18's are naive from both a tactical and mental standpoint with many having gotten that far mainly on talent and many thinking they've already made it or are guaranteed to be Premier League players because they play for United. I don't see how GCSE results have anything to do with what I said.

I never said he's irreplaceable but the idea that any half decent manager could do the job that he does shows a lack of knowledge of how much he actually does and how difficult the role can be at times.
 
With all respect to people who have more insights in our academy football than me, I think anyone is replacable, we replaced McGuiness with McKenna and we are doing extremely well lately in that cathegory, yes of course we now have extremely talented crop of players there but the brand of football is more pleasing for me too but we will see about this later...

Joyce is a great old school coach and motivator, but don't think he's anything special in terms of tactics, he also has his other cons like when he tends to play players out of position and sticking to too much deadwood like el futuri, weir etc. but I guess we cant always have special talents in every positions and it's not his fault to have players he has but I think out there there might. Anyway I am generally in agreement with @WhoDaGOAT

And I am not calling for Joyce's head but I think he can be replaced with a coach with good or even better traits too, we will see what Nicky Butt thinks about this soon imo..
 
So you complained about someone making assumptions then do exactly that yourself while also ignoring what people who actually know Joyce and have worked with him on a daily basis say.

I didn't assume anything about Phelan. You are trying to hype Joyce based on some parents and players being happy with his ability to ground them and instill good habits, which I never disputed.



If Joyce had only ever worked with 18 year old apprentices you might have a point but he has worked with plenty of players who have been on big contracts and have been in or around the first team just as Gray is and most have given him a lot of credit for helping them develop and making them ready for first team football.

Right, but has he improved them technically or tactically? I haven't seen any evidence of players improving drastically in these areas. Maybe others weren't impressed with the likes of Weir and Willock at U18 level, but I personally was.

There's a big difference between being disciplined and learning how to actually make it as a professional player and Joyce does a good job of preparing players for what it takes to actually be a senior footballer.


What do you think he does with them that prepares them better than say an Arsenal, Liverpool or City coach?

I'm not painting them as naive it's a fact that many of the players who have come up from the under 18's are naive from both a tactical and mental standpoint with many having gotten that far mainly on talent and many thinking they've already made it or are guaranteed to be Premier League players because they play for United. I don't see how GCSE results have anything to do with what I said.

Well, footballers are cocky in general. One of the reasons why we attract young players is because they are told that while they might not necessarily make it here at United, we will do our best to get them to a level that's good enough for a career in the game. And we do it well.

It sounds like you are painting them as naive kids with little discipline or realistic goals, but that's incorrect because the attention to school education is teaching them knowledge outside of the game, so that they are well rounded young men. The parents play a part as well. If they set a bad example, the player will likely follow their lead. Some of them plan for life after United. Some have higher ambitions than others.


I never said he's irreplaceable but the idea that any half decent manager could do the job that he does shows a lack of knowledge of how much he actually does and how difficult the role can be at times.

Managing some of the most talented prospects in the country, with state of the art training facilities and equipment, as well as access to expert fitness coaches and sports scientists, is pretty easy compared to 90% of the other Reseve team manager positions. Do you think he's superior to those before him? It's a dream job for any enthusiastic coach who enjoys working with young people.

Think of the coaches at less glamorous clubs who are still expected to produce first team players. Crewe and Fulham, for example. At least our coaches rarely have to worry about players being poached from U18 level upwards.
 
People just need to look at City to see how hard it is to get a good manager at Reserves level. It's not a coincidence that most of the fans of the top clubs complain about their Reserves manager, every decent manager can do the job well is a stretch since it contains difference sets of challenge than managing a first team squad and I do think some of the top clubs underrated the importance of this role, for example Barca when they gave it to Eusebio. If you have watched the U18s and U23s over the years you can easily see that U23s players are much more well-drilled tactically than when they were at U18s level and that's a clear evidence of Joyce's work, in fact that's the most important thing at this level to prepare them for first team football at any club. It's not just us but opponent fans also praised about how well-drilled Joyce's teams are. My only complain is his selection could be very favoured to the older lads at times and he gave too many instructions on the sideline which is not how it works at first team level. The likes of McKenna works well at U18s level but give him an unbalanced squad and he will struggle as well, just need to look at last week when they don't have Buffonge and Chong. Who're the technical players that didn't improve under Joyce? Januzaj, Pereira, Wilson, Harrop, Willock, Tuanzebe etc all improved under him. At this age you can't teach them new tricks and it's all about how they apply what they already have and improve their mental attributes, tactical awareness and work ethics. Most of the players promoted to the first team last season responded very well to the demand at top level and I think it's fair to say Joyce should take massive credits alongside other Reserves staffs.

He's hardly irreplacable as he's not Fergie or Pep in fact I doubt he will set the world alight at PL level but don't pretend it's easy to find a more suitable candidate that would choose this job instead of first team manager somewhere.
 
Last edited:
There is a lot of assumption within your post. The players who make it at Championship level and above have done so mainly because of their talent He's not teaching them any revolutionary tactics; he's a good motivator and disciplinarian.

It's one thing to motivate a bunch of kids, it's another to motivate well paid men. Players don't react well to a hard-ass in this modern age. They're immature and overpaid. They do what they want within reason. He has a good gig here at United. I think he might be better suited to managing young players over men.

As for Phelan, we don't know what he did or didn't do. I rate Meulensteen highly. I credit both him and Queiroz for our tactical improvement in European competition.

This is a myth, there are a bunch of other reasons why players dont react well to a hard ass today. This sort of belief is lazy thinking and far removed from the actual reasons.
 
What does being likeable have anything to do with his tactics and level of coaching though?

I think he is a brilliant motivator. He makes sure his sides work hard first and foremost. That should be the minimum expected of any team, but it often isn't.

He does well at this level with an excellent infrastructure around him.

I think nearly any decent manager can do a job at this level at United.

Players like managers who help them progress...are good coaches and prepare then for first team football.

Players won't play for a manager/coach they don't like. It's the basics of leadership.

Whether he is 'likeable' or not may not be an issue but the players respond to him. So clearly they appreciate something that you don't. And they train with him every day.

I still don't see any evidence from you about his supposed lack of tactical coaching or individual player development.
 
Can any of Joyce's ardent supporters here (having watched the reserves for the last few years) honestly say you think he is an expansive attacking coach that fits in with the "United way" we like to emphasise all the time? Joyce always sets his teams up with men behind the ball to defend first and attack second and although we may have the upper hand against the smaller teams, when we play the likes of city and Chelsea they nearly always create the better chances and have more of the ball. We need a new era of expansive football, McKenna is a good start but more coaches like him need to come in.
 
We play against poor Lancashire teams and the likes of Chelsea who have already loaned out the majority of their best U23 players. Solksjaer did well in this position also. Now look at him.

Joyce is an old fashioned person. A throwback to the mid 90's. He remind of Nigel Pearson. He's good at what he does at this level, but we often have far more talented players than the opposition.

Nice of you to give your pal a pass on his insights into what Phelan did on the training ground though.

Great comparison with Ole who also won the Norwegian League.

You seem to be basing a managers ability to manage on the basis that he wears rather than the results and development of players under him. No point in arguing with that logic.
 
Can any of Joyce's ardent supporters here (having watched the reserves for the last few years) honestly say you think he is an expansive attacking coach that fits in with the "United way" we like to emphasise all the time? Joyce always sets his teams up with men behind the ball to defend first and attack second and although we may have the upper hand against the smaller teams, when we play the likes of city and Chelsea they nearly always create the better chances and have more of the ball. We need a new era of expansive football, McKenna is a good start but more coaches like him need to come in.
Apart from conceding the least goals in the league last season we were also the top scorers in the league despite not having a striker for much of the 2nd half of the season. In the past 2 seasons we've beaten Chelsea twice and drawn against them 3 times and haven't been beaten and have beaten City 3 times including a 4-0 and a 4-1 win. When Joyce has attacking players he plays a more attacking style like in the run of 4 or 5 games last January where we had at least 20 attempts on goal but for the past while he hasn't had many attackers so has focused more on making the side hard to beat which I think is an important think for young players to learn and serves them well as professionals.
 
Last edited:
Apart from conceding the least goals in the league last season we were also the top scorers in the league despite not having a striker for much of the 2nd half of the season. In the past 2 seasons we've beaten Chelsea twice and drawn against them 3 times and haven't been beaten and have beaten City 3 times including a 4-0 and a 4-1 win. When Joyce has attacking players he plays a more attacking style like in the run of 4 or 5 games last January where we had at least 20 attempts on goal but for the past while he hasn't had many attackers so has focused more on making the side hard to beat which I think is an important think for young players to learn and serves them well as professionals.

Yep. He's always been a pragmatist, tactically, in that he plays whatever sort of football suits the players available. We've had some very free-scoring sides under him. How many times have Wilson and Keane scored 4 or 5 in a single game under Joyce?
 
Great comparison with Ole who also won the Norwegian League.

You seem to be basing a managers ability to manage on the basis that he wears rather than the results and development of players under him. No point in arguing with that logic.

4 years ago. Norwegian football is in a bad way at present. He was incredibly naive during his time at Cardiff. Now he's pretty much irrelevant.

You, like others, seem to take offence to anyone's opinion of Joyce that doesn't fit with your interpretation of him.

I think Joyce does a good job for us. I just thought the dig at Phelan was ridiculous considering that Joyce is managing one of the best U23 teams in the country.
 
Can any of Joyce's ardent supporters here (having watched the reserves for the last few years) honestly say you think he is an expansive attacking coach that fits in with the "United way" we like to emphasise all the time? Joyce always sets his teams up with men behind the ball to defend first and attack second and although we may have the upper hand against the smaller teams, when we play the likes of city and Chelsea they nearly always create the better chances and have more of the ball. We need a new era of expansive football, McKenna is a good start but more coaches like him need to come in.

Even if what you were saying were true, that he's a dour, boring coach whose teams never attack (absolute bollocks but I'll humour you), surely that's quite a good thing to have after they leave the u18 side of a guy who plays free flowing attacking football? One develops their technique and helps them to enjoy the game, the other teaches them tactics, how to defend, how to be professional and do the ugly side of the game in order to win.
 
Even if what you were saying were true, that he's a dour, boring coach whose teams never attack (absolute bollocks but I'll humour you), surely that's quite a good thing to have after they leave the u18 side of a guy who plays free flowing attacking football? One develops their technique and helps them to enjoy the game, the other teaches them tactics, how to defend, how to be professional and do the ugly side of the game in order to win.
I note this post and the results quoted by jb but it doesn't change my opinion. His mantra for me has always been men behind the ball first and attack second. With top young players like Januzaj, Wilson, Pereira etc the goals will inevitably come, but he is not an attacking coach by any means. I want an attacking philosophy throughout all levels at the club and a consistent attacking mindset ingrained in our young players.

It's funny how whenever we loose people are happy to say it's all about individual player development and coaching, yet if someone critiqued the style of play then results are quoted as a way of showing how good a youth coach is. Joyce nearly always concedes the impetus to the other big teams when we play them and tries to hit them on the break/capitalise on their mistakes. It can yield results but it's not the mindset I want for a Manchester United team.
 
I note this post and the results quoted by jb but it doesn't change my opinion. His mantra for me has always been men behind the ball first and attack second. With top young players like Januzaj, Wilson, Pereira etc the goals will inevitably come, but he is not an attacking coach by any means. I want an attacking philosophy throughout all levels at the club and a consistent attacking mindset ingrained in our young players.

It's funny how whenever we loose people are happy to say it's all about individual player development and coaching, yet if someone critiqued the style of play then results are quoted as a way of showing how good a youth coach is. Joyce nearly always concedes the impetus to the other big teams when we play them and tries to hit them on the break/capitalise on their mistakes. It can yield results but it's not the mindset I want for a Manchester United team.

Erm, not really. U18s winning is important but not as much as the reserves. Pretty much every premier league setup agrees on that. And I don't think you'll ever catch me saying it doesn't matter at all that any Man United side from u18s up loses.
 
U15s lost 3-5 against Liverpool in the final of the Blades Cup yesterday after leading 3-1 at HT. Liverpool's Bright Amagotheng gone freak in the second half and scored 4 goals. Our goals were scored by Greenwood, Elanga and Abdul Djalo (not Dyalo).

Here is the teamsheet (a lot of wrong spellings though). Michael Elechi and Ayodeji Sotona are new signings.

CvJzVLHWcAErXHh.jpg
 
4 years ago. Norwegian football is in a bad way at present. He was incredibly naive during his time at Cardiff. Now he's pretty much irrelevant.

You, like others, seem to take offence to anyone's opinion of Joyce that doesn't fit with your interpretation of him.

I think Joyce does a good job for us. I just thought the dig at Phelan was ridiculous considering that Joyce is managing one of the best U23 teams in the country.

I wasnt taking a dig at Phelan though? I think he's a perfectly decent coach who is doing an okayish job at Hull right now.
 
Looks like Luis Campos could be staying with us, his talks with Marseille are said to have broken down/in danger of breaking down.
 
Looks like Luis Campos could be staying with us, his talks with Marseille are said to have broken down/in danger of breaking down.

The discussion started over someone thinking that Joyce would be a better option than Phelan, so it wouldn't be a good idea to have him as his assistant.
 
The discussion started over someone thinking that Joyce would be a better option than Phelan, so it wouldn't be a good idea to have him as his assistant.

This is completely seperate to that? I was the one who said that Joyce would be a better option than Phelan, by the way.
 
This is completely seperate to that? I was the one who said that Joyce would be a better option than Phelan, by the way.

You started a debate about the credentials of Phelan and Joyce with your comment. What's not to get?
 
You started a debate about the credentials of Phelan and Joyce with your comment. What's not to get?
If you're going to try to act superior to other people you should probably at least make sure your comment has some relevance to the post you quoted. It's a pretty big thread so not everything posted in it is related so maybe you should stop arguing for arguments sake and trying to keep it going when people can't be bothered replying to you anymore
 
If you're going to try to act superior to other people you should probably at least make sure your comment has some relevance to the post you quoted. It's a pretty big thread so not everything posted in it is related so maybe you should stop arguing for arguments sake and trying to keep it going when people can't be bothered replying to you anymore

Haha. Says the guy who rode in on his high horse and then didn't have it in him to stand your ground. Maybe you should leave the moderating to the mods.
 
Haha. Says the guy who rode in on his high horse and then didn't have it in him to stand your ground. Maybe you should leave the moderating to the mods.
Nothing to do with not having it in me I was actually trying to have a discussion while you seemed intent on arguing using things such as him wearing shorts and using hypothetical situations with very little reason behind them as the logic behind your opinions while downplaying or just ignoring actual facts because they didn't suit your argument and stating things which were just plain wrong as if they were fact so I thought it was better to just leave it rather than going round in circles. With some of your recent posts in this and other threads and the way you speak to people I'm sure the mods will take note of you soon enough if they haven't already. We've derailed this thread enough so no point in continuing to do so.
 
Last edited:
Erm, not really. U18s winning is important but not as much as the reserves. Pretty much every premier league setup agrees on that. And I don't think you'll ever catch me saying it doesn't matter at all that any Man United side from u18s up loses.
It was a general comment to the thread not directed at you in particular.
I wasn't saying winning at a particular age group was more important than another. All I was saying is that winning is secondary to development and a consistent style of play.
 
It was a general comment to the thread not directed at you in particular.
I wasn't saying winning at a particular age group was more important than another. All I was saying is that winning is secondary to development and a consistent style of play.

Winning is an important component of their development once they start to get to u18 level, and an indicator of it too for that matter.
 
Nothing to do with not having it in me I was actually trying to have a discussion while you seemed intent on arguing using things such as him wearing shorts and using hypothetical situations with very little reason behind them as the logic behind your opinions while downplaying or just ignoring actual facts because they didn't suit your argument and stating things which were just plain wrong as if they were fact so I thought it was better to just leave it rather than going round in circles. With some of your recent posts in this and other threads and the way you speak to people I'm sure the mods will take note of you soon enough if they haven't already. We've derailed this thread enough so no point in continuing to do so.

The key word in the thread title being "miscellaneous". The last time I checked, Joyce was the Reserve team manager.

Just because the points made didn't suit your narrative, you claim your own as facts. Arrogance.

I'm happy to jog on though.
 
Neil McDonald appointed assistant manager at Hull, the role Joyce would reportedly be taking!