Media absolutely love the guy. But I'm starting to wonder how long that will last. His tactics are killing his main striker and best player. He's been backed by the board in the summer and I can't see them being any more successful than last season.
But atleast with wenger and even emery you were creating chances and dominating games. Now you are not even creating anything. Partey wouldn't help you create. Also it's not like willock is playing bad then ok maybe one may say yes get a proper 10 and you will dominate but it's not like that. The issue comes with the manager for me in this case.It's tough 1 to judge. In a way, Arteta will feel justified at going defensively early on his reign as he realised he hadn't the midfield strong enough & athletic enough to open the game up.
He's tried to be more open the last couple of games at home, & we've seen the midfield get bypassed time & time again, especially tonight first half.
So, until we either get Partey fit & more suitable players in, we have no idea if Arteta can really coach or if it really is just a player issue. The fact similar happened with these players under Wenger & Emery suggest it's the players.
What is with the media love in with him? Hargreaves just said he’s doing a good job. Arsenal have the same points as us with a game in hand, yet Ole is put under constant pressure.
Under Wenger top 4 wasn’t good enough. Since then Arsenal have been on a downwards trajectory, yet the media perception on what they achieve is completely different.
But atleast with wenger and even emery you were creating chances and dominating games. Now you are not even creating anything. Partey wouldn't help you create. Also it's not like willock is playing bad then ok maybe one may say yes get a proper 10 and you will dominate but it's not like that. The issue comes with the manager for me in this case.
I am not even making this up but Wolves looked more entertaining to watch than you lots today and that is not good for a club like arsenal.
At times we were, at other times like near the end under Wenger & big parts under Emery we were getting dominated by the likes of Palace & Watford.
Todays team was basically the same team Emery had, but with Gabriel & Willian. Do we honestly think that's enough of an improvement to elevate the team?
Partey wouldn't help us create, but the hope would be that he could offer better protection to the back line & at least offer us a bit of pace & athleticism in midfield. Just seen tonight he's out for a few more games, so that's a massive loss. Basically he'll have played about 3 games since signing & we'll be well into December before he's fit enough. We're just not good enough to cover that loss.
You say Wolves looked more entertaining, and I agree, because they had players that fit what they are trying to do today. Theres about 4 or 5 players I'd take at Arsenal. Same with Leicester. That's pretty damning of where we are.
Ridiculous. He seems like he doesn’t know how to get them playing in a way that allows them to create chances/control games.
They’re second best most of the time.
This is hardly a vintage Arsenal side, but there are some good attacking players there. Lacazaette, Willian, Auba and Pepe range from very decent to quite good. Midfield is also decent. Bellerin, Saka and Eleny are decent players, where as Partey would get into most teams in the league imo.
Auba has shown hes a "30 goals a season striker".If he gets chances he will score. The problem right now is that hes getting zero service. Part of the problem is the lack of create midfielders, but a bigger part is how cautious Arsenal have become under Arteta, both the defense and the midfield are sitting incredibly deep when defending, and when you do win the ball there is a long way forward with very few players to play to
Arsenal have big wages going into older players like Auba and Willian for the next few seasons. I can’t see them altering personnel a great deal.
Arsenal could be in a world of pain going into the new year if they don’t figure things out.
Bearing in mind how much of a doubter you've been re Ole, this is an exceptionally hilarious take.It's skewing the stats. Emery had a strong win 55% win percentage for Arsenal but was far from good enough in the league. It was propped up by 70% win % in Europa League, which he's known for. He was the same with Sevilla, good in Europa League but terribly underperforming domestically.
Arteta scores less and is more passive, but he has turned Arsenal into a far more resolute side than Emery did. As I said Arteta is building foundations at the club and you can see the progress in how much trickier it is to score against them, how more aggressive they are and so on. He walked in and saw what a sorry pile of shit they are by way of aggression, application and set pieces. He's organized them and brought in set piece specialists to work on their defending and offensive returns from those areas (and it shows in the stats too). But to suggest that's all they are when he's barely 1 year into the role is a bit primitive, especially considering he's had little in the way of a budget relative to Ole or Lampard.
I think one seriously odd move he made was insisting on Aubameyang wide. But as I say the level of criticism his way is overcooked.
Amazing how you don't see why that's the case. Ole spent almost 200m in year 1, and then another 50-70m in season 2. He also has 2 years completed in the role compared to just 1 with Arteta. Jesus christ.
Whats hilarious is your lazy comparison If Arteta spent 250m and was in his 3rd season then sure.Bearing in mind how much of a doubter you've been re Ole, this is an exceptionally hilarious take.
We’ve been trying to get rid of loads of players every year for some reason we’ve struggled - hopefully your transition will be smoother.Ozil, Mustafi, Luiz, Sokratis all out of contract in the summer, Kolasinac, Lacazette, Torriera, Guendouzi, Chambers, Maitland-Niles bare minimum all likely to be available for transfer. We should be able to trade if we are brave enough to embrace change.
Whats hilarious is your lazy comparison If Arteta spent 250m and was in his 3rd season then sure.
Not to mention like with Ole, I've said Arteta needs to pick up too.
Net spend is relevant when judging transfer business by executives but it's not as relevant when looking at new managers is it? Is it Arteta's fault that Arsenal fecked up on Pepe who is not remotely as marketable as Lukaku was for Ole?Over the past two seasons, our net spend has been more than Arsenal by a mighty 30m, and if we're to consider this season only, then it's a difference of 3m
The replies are actually superb
only for description, made me laugh
I'm sure there are issues behind the scenes that are beyond pointing to Arteta. Saliba, the decision for Ozil (might well be related to his social media outburst against China). Even on Pepe they launched an investigation and sacked a senior member of the board.Quite curious why is he not playing Saliba? Yes he is 19 but he was a regular for St. Etienne so he can start ahead of Holding or Mustafi.
Whats hilarious is your lazy comparison If Arteta spent 250m and was in his 3rd season then sure.
Not to mention like with Ole, I've said Arteta needs to pick up too.
No one is blindly talking about money and a budget. Ole has been in the role 6 months longer, has spent more and is held to the same level of evaluation, i.e. pick up consistency relative to the quality of your squad or risk the sack. I've said the same in Arteta.Klopp spent more than 350m to win CL & the league. Mourinho spent more than 350m for only for short term one year 2nd place and collapsed like a building that can’t stand anymore after being built for a year. The season when Poch was backed with lot of money was the season when he failed and lost his job.
No point just blindly talking about money and budget if you can’t spend on the right players. Is Arteta even capable to do that? Not easy to spend bigger money. But Ole is doing good job in that aspect.
Somewhat understandable with Ozil's situation although arteta said he was left out for footballing reason. But Saliba one is strange. He was highly rated and even termed Mbappe of centre backs so why is he not picked and groomed. He was playing first team football in French league so he can definitely be in the senior squad. Weird one to say the least.I'm sure there are issues behind the scenes that are beyond pointing to Arteta. Saliba, the decision for Ozil (might well be related to his social media outburst against China). Even on Pepe they launched an investigation and sacked a senior member of the board.
No one is blindly talking about money and a budget. Ole has been in the role 6 months longer, has spent more and is held to the same level of evaluation, i.e. pick up consistency relative to the quality of your squad or risk the sack. I've said the same in Arteta.
It's more blind to just bring in Klopp and Mourinho into it as you have, Jose spent his money and took United 2nd in their highest points total since SAF. He got sacked after failing to sustain his consistency thereafter and alienating the dressing room.
Klopp spent his money and challenged for the title and reaching a CL Final, then he won the title + Champions League. Poch reached the end of a cycle and got sacked, I don't think the summer Poch was suddenly packed was one where he spent similar outlays to Klopp or Mou or Ole though. He had what, £50m on Ndombeleas his biggest breakthrough transfer and that was roughly that for the summer.