Interesting responses - and all pretty fair...
I think this is fascinating because RedCafe is the only rival forum I visit. I grew up in the 90s, so the Arsenal vs United was
the rivalry for me.
I don't think this is controversial at all, I very much agree. Lacazette had a purple patch of assisting for a few games, but then was very poor. Had Arteta either kept Auba or replaced Laczette with Nketiah earlier, we would likely have made the CL.
For the record, I'm broadly speaking Wenger IN / Emery OUT / Arteta IN. An oversimplification - but a useful one. The goalpost have definitely moved for those who hounded Wenger out. I think it's deplorable. But a lot of those fans are no longer at the stadium. Many of them are probably gone altogether. There is quite a different vibe among fans now.
As for Emery, he wasn't fired for finishing 5th, he kept his job. We were tanking the season he was sacked. Arteta started with us in 12th. If Emery had us in 5th there would have been no pressing reason to look for a replacement. There were a lot of issues with Emery beyond our league position. He's a good Manager and an honourable man, but he found it difficult to get his ideas across (no doubt exacerbated by his struggles with the language).
I subscribe to The Athletic and watch quite a few Guillem Balagué videos... and even I find some of the analysis of Arteta to be overly fawning - so that's definitely fair. I think Arteta has had an easier ride than Ole because:
- He's a complete rookie so there may be potential vs Ole as a known quantity
- He won a trophy in England months into his career beating City and Chelsea on the way
- United have higher current expectations in line with their transfer spend, wage bill and club reputation