This thread is all over the place : )
Daydreamer, the most important context is that "3rd least goals in 20/21" was never anything to brag about, because Arsenal conceded 39 goals. That's over a goal per game. This is not a good defensive record. There was never a solid defensive base there, which is why adding new defensive players who were ostensibly better didn't actually do much.
This would be a relevant point if anyone was pointing to our 20/21 defensive record as a reason for sticking with Arteta in 22/23. But nobody was.
On matchday 3 Arsenal played Manchester City away. They only played with 1 player from their first choice defense (Tierney). They conceded 5 goals. That's more than half of the goals they conceded in those first 3 matches.
But on matchday 13 they played Liverpool away. And this time they had 4 of their 5 first choice defenders: Ramsdale, White, Tomiyasu, and Gabriel. And they conceded 4 goals. That is pretty good evidence that having the best defenders unavailable is not the reason why they conceded so many goals in those first matches.
Leaving aside the fact that Salah tore Tavares apart that day - this would be relevant if anybody said we only concede goals when our best defenders are unavailable. But nobody did.
The issue here is people keep defending Arteta by saying he had to rebuild a shit squad. But that defense stops being serious when you're also blaming poor results on players he's signed and renewed. It's his squad, and it's very silly to try to blame the squad deficiencies on Arsenal not having enough money.
This would be relevant if anyone said that this isn't his squad and that our deficiencies are due to a lack of money. But nobody did.
Arteta didn't sign Holding or El Neny. He extended their contracts because that was a sensible thing to do. They're on reasonable wages. Tavares and Cedric cost £7m combined. That's two squad players from previous managers (Holding / El Neny), one raw prospect (Tavares) and a free transfer stop-gap (Cedric). The addition of Zinchenko and the return of Saliba means we shouldn't have to rely on them anymore.
During the run-in we suffered injuries to the areas of our squad where the drop off in quality was the most steep. Had Spurs lost Kane or Son for any amount of time, the wheels would have come off for them because their system relies on them and their replacements are of nowhere near the same quality.
Teams like Real Madrid can both avoid and mitigate the effects of injuries due to the quality of their squad. Holding, Cedric, Tavares and El Neny would not get anywhere near your squad. Me saying you're unfamiliar with the concept of having to "make due with what you've got"
was a compliment. Stating that even your time-wasting injury-time subs have 11 caps for Spain proves my point better than I ever could : )
This is a genuine question, why do you care about Arteta so much that you feel compelled to (unsuccessfully) downplay the quality of your squad? I'm an Arsenal fan - I know why I care. But I can't imagine being a Real Madrid fan and being interested enough in Arteta to try and use a late Ceballos substitute appearance as a stick to beat him with. For me, that would be like hanging around in a Brendan Rogers thread. I don't particularly rate Rogers... but I don't care about him either. For real, I'm just interested - I'm seriously not trying to antagonise.