Kapardin
New Member
Most people are underrating him, but I am willing to bet he will be better for us than Sanchez will be for City or whatever big club he goes to next. Out of the two, I actually prefer Ozil.
No one takes any of your posts seriously and rightly so.He had a decent 10 minute spell where he scored tonight, but other than that he was sloppy and lethargic and just like Mata and Mkhi has no ability to protect the ball when pressed, not to mention the huge space he leaves for players to just run into as he doesn't help out his CM's. He's not what this team is missing, we have plenty of big game no shows who are weak against the press, we need someone that will allow Pogba freedom and help Matic, not another luxury that is easily bullied out of a game.
No one takes any of your posts seriously and rightly so.
Precisely. You just lost all credibility. You may as well delete your account and start again.When you say you're gonna stop watching United because we bought Lukaku, you know your opinion can't be taken seriously
But when the team isn't playing well the vast majority of time no players will be playing well either. Look at our poor games and Pogba, Martial, Rashford or whoever also play poor when we play poor. If they were playing good then the team wouldn't really be playing poor would they. How often do you see players having a good game when the team is playing poor? Rarely. Especially for a passing playmaker type.I think we need to sign Ozil because he wouldn't get away with drifting in and out of games here at United. Tonight Liverpool couldn't handle him for a short spell and its clear you need someone to do the dirty work for Ozil because if you give him a free role he will do serious damage. I've also noticed that when the team is playing well Ozil plays well and everything good goes through him. However when the team is playing bad he dissappears. If Mourinho can motivate him to play for the whole 90 minutes with the same intensity then I have no doubt we should sign because he is much better than any of our options at Number 10.
No one takes any of your posts seriously and rightly so.
Troll? You stated when we signed Lukaku that you weren't going to watch us anymore because we weren't going to play the kind of football that you like (the videogame kind). Are you denying it?Oh little trolls out of their basement I see.
Troll? You stated when we signed Lukaku that you weren't going to watch us anymore because we weren't going to play the kind of football that you like (the videogame kind). Are you denying it?
That's all you needed to say. I repeat, you can't be taken seriously.
We could allow a player like Ozil to be “lazy” in our team. He’s definitely a luxury player but if any team can afford a luxury player, it’s us. Don’t get me wry, I’m not saying he shouldn’t defend etc etc however, he’d be to us, what Ronaldo is for Real.
Pogba's our luxury though, often massively out of position leaving Matic with all of the work to do, it's why teams run through the center of us so easily, and you can afford a luxury like Ronaldo as he plays wide and scores 50 goals a season to offset his lack of work for the team.
Pogba's our luxury though, often massively out of position leaving Matic with all of the work to do, it's why teams run through the center of us so easily, and you can afford a luxury like Ronaldo as he plays wide and scores 50 goals a season to offset his lack of work for the team.
Kin ell.
I didn't say anything untrue, Pogba is a free roaming player.
This season, Pogba has registered 1.04 touches per minute; nobody else at Old Trafford breaks the 1.00 barrier. His 0.81 passes per minute is also the highest of any United player. These are both to be expected, but Pogba has also attempted shots at a rate virtually identical (one every 27.9 mins vs 28.5 mins) to Romelu Lukaku. He has completed dribbles at a virtually identical rate (one per 31.1 mins vs 31.0 mins) to Anthony Martial too. Pogba does not just bridge the gap between midfield and attack; he is the midfield and attack.
Pogba's our luxury though, often massively out of position leaving Matic with all of the work to do, it's why teams run through the center of us so easily, and you can afford a luxury like Ronaldo as he plays wide and scores 50 goals a season to offset his lack of work for the team.
Pogba's our luxury though, often massively out of position leaving Matic with all of the work to do, it's why teams run through the center of us so easily, and you can afford a luxury like Ronaldo as he plays wide and scores 50 goals a season to offset his lack of work for the team.
Ozil isn’t lazy.
He’s lazy under Wenger. But if anyone watched him for Madrid he was far from lazy because Mourinho pushes him to work hard.
Precisely. You just lost all credibility. You may as well delete your account and start again.
You compared him to Ronaldo levels of not working for the team and called him a "luxury player" rather than a more "free roaming player" so yeah, you said stuff that is clearly untrue.
Let's just think about that again @Devil may care whilst reading the following:
Does that sound like a "luxury player" to you?
I don't think luxury is the right word to describe Pogba as he's the most important player in the team but I do get your point about him and Ozil playing together.
I rate Ozil but I rate Pogba higher...and if we want to get the best of Pogba, we don't need Ozil ( or any other #10 ) but 1 or 2 CM to play in a midfield 3.
Nonsense.Throughout his career? Yes. At Real? Easily. At Arsenal? No way. Even in this match where people are saying he played well, he gave the ball away countless times and had probably 4-5 good moments. It's unfair to compare Ozil's past self when he hasn't been at that level consistently for years, and then forgetting what Mikhi was like at Dortmund at the same time.