Could be great for the short term. As of now he'd a terrific addition. Only worry would be the long term. That he shouldn't become an expensive burden a year or two from now. Also our signings always sound great on paper but the attackers in particular always tend to play worse than they did for their previous clubs.
I'd probably sign him in a short contract if be was willing. He probably wouldn't be.
he's just waiting for someone to get married so he can announce it at a wedding.MEN says we have not shown interest in Ozil, and the player has not told his team-mates he's leaving for OT
I’d take him in January but not in the summer. He’d be useful for the second half of the season.
He'll be available for our CL campaignBasically if we are to go after him, id rather we didnt, its best do it in January to bolster the squad options. Whats the rules with EL and CL and being cup tied?
He'll be available for our CL campaign
I would take him this Jan.
Can play in CL. used to the PL, already worked with Mourinho and would improve us massively.
He would fit well in our team just behind Lukaku and would connect well with Mkhitaryan down the right.
We still need more technics in our team. Mata goes less effective, Mkhitaryam waste too many balls and Rashford just keep running.
We would need this type of player to create not only the assists, but also provide the pass before the assist, he can create spaces with his pass and is clever.
I would take him for 20M with no hesitation
I moved this to the Ozil thread as we were clogging up Mkhi's.The Mkhi giving his all is more against him than helping. I meant if these past games were supposed to Mkhi giving his all then Lingard has been outperforming him just by mere effort. The contrast of Lingard being subbed on vs L'pool and this Tottenham game and Mkhi's effort is astonishing. As I put it in my previous post in response to other poster trying downplay Lingard today, Mkhi ghosted most of his minutes on the pitch and we played almost like a man down, while Lingard introduction actually gave us a balance in midfield battle and that connection between the forwards with the rest of the team
As I put it, no 10 role in counter attack play is to be present to help the forward. Failed to do just that despite not providing the workrate of Lingard's short quality, then that no 10 is worthless.
I meant in my previous post that I wouldn't expect Madrid Ozil all the time, but even his worst is not that useless aka not crap bottom level as it is exegerated by unrealistic expectation.
I agree that Ozil would be short term planning, but realistically it is needed to gain every possible edge. We're to fix the long term failure in immediate finding competent coach to succeed SAF. While we might have undone the damage, we are still building up to get back to that level. You need short term flexibilities for this type of situation.
I moved this to the Ozil thread as we were clogging up Mkhi's.
I can't disagree with most of that. Though I do see what you mean about Mkhi giving his all being more against him than for, I prefer it to Ozil's lazy showings as it gets on my nerves now despite not even liking Arsenal. He's no so much giving his all in terms of showcasing his full talent; he's just working hard for the team, which, even though I agree isn't enough from a #10, shows he at least cares.
Still, I agree with most of what you say. I'm not too keen on the player but I can see why a lot of fans are in favour of signing him and if José wants him then we'll have to trust his judgement. It's working so far with Matic.
We do need an upgrade on Mata and Mkhi and whilst signing Ozil doesn't necessarily mean we won't sign another attacker, it does make it less likely. Still, Ozil (if he performs like José thinks he can) alone could help boost the team.Signing Ozil isn't excluding any other acquisition at #10\playmaker role. We need to upgrade both our options there in Mata and Mkhi, neither of them are good enough for where we want to be.
It's definitely worth a shot but I'm not the biggest fan of either player. They are indeed an upgrade on both Mata and Mkhi so I won't complain if that's the route José chooses to go down, though.Getting Ozil on a free when we are likely to spend something like 100m euros on Griezmann would be good business. Both will be significant upgrades on what we currently have.
That's pretty much where I stand. Someone like Carlos Soler to carry the ball forward, and someone like Malcom for RF, a bit of dash and skill, and I'd be sorted.4-3-3
Ozil would set us on the wrong track. As great as he is, I want another midfielder who can step in when Pogba is injured and augment him when he isn't.