Mesut Ozil on a free? | Orn: Ozil signs new contract worth 350k

Do you want Ozil at Manchester United?


  • Total voters
    1,027
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Could be great for the short term. As of now he'd a terrific addition. Only worry would be the long term. That he shouldn't become an expensive burden a year or two from now. Also our signings always sound great on paper but the attackers in particular always tend to play worse than they did for their previous clubs.

I'd probably sign him in a short contract if be was willing. He probably wouldn't be.
 
Could be great for the short term. As of now he'd a terrific addition. Only worry would be the long term. That he shouldn't become an expensive burden a year or two from now. Also our signings always sound great on paper but the attackers in particular always tend to play worse than they did for their previous clubs.

I'd probably sign him in a short contract if be was willing. He probably wouldn't be.

2 years plus the usual extension option sounds about right.
 
I’d take him in January but not in the summer. He’d be useful for the second half of the season.
 
MEN says we have not shown interest in Ozil, and the player has not told his team-mates he's leaving for OT
he's just waiting for someone to get married so he can announce it at a wedding.
 
If we signed him, and didn’t sign Griezmann, I wouldn’t mind if it meant we end up going for a RW.
 
Wouldn't mind taking a punt especially if it's for free or for a small fee if signed in January. Just as long as it doesn't prevent us from signing players who are of a better quality IMO like a Griezmann or a Dybala.

Been a massive fan of Ozil since his Bremen days, I remember seeing him play a few times there and also at the World Cup in 2010 and I really wanted him at United back then, even though he probably didn't suit our style at the time. However, he ended up at Madrid and was just sensational under Mourinho. Assist, after assist and even chipped in with a few goals too every season.

The year he signed for Arsenal I was hoping we went for him and if I remember correctly we were heavily linked with him for a day or 2 by Sky Sports before he eventually signed for Arsenal.

Yes he has been a bit up and down while at Arsenal but you can clearly see the quality is there and with the right team and management around him, I believe he would flourish.
 
Basically if we are to go after him, id rather we didnt, its best do it in January to bolster the squad options. Whats the rules with EL and CL and being cup tied?
He'll be available for our CL campaign
 
We will have another Berbatov but is ok to have pass maters.as we dont have any.
 
Think we should make an aggressive play for both him and Sanchez in Jan. Make Wenger an offer he can't refuse. Something like 50million quid plus Mata and Mkhitaryan. I'm sure he'll see reason, he is an economist after all.
 
Personally i think it would be a "how the hell were Arse stupid enough to let him come to us" transfer, same as the Matic signing.
Edit : If it happened, obv
 
I would take him this Jan.

Can play in CL. used to the PL, already worked with Mourinho and would improve us massively.

He would fit well in our team just behind Lukaku and would connect well with Mkhitaryan down the right.

We still need more technics in our team. Mata goes less effective, Mkhitaryam waste too many balls and Rashford just keep running.

We would need this type of player to create not only the assists, but also provide the pass before the assist, he can create spaces with his pass and is clever.

I would take him for 20M with no hesitation
 
I would take him this Jan.

Can play in CL. used to the PL, already worked with Mourinho and would improve us massively.

He would fit well in our team just behind Lukaku and would connect well with Mkhitaryan down the right.

We still need more technics in our team. Mata goes less effective, Mkhitaryam waste too many balls and Rashford just keep running.

We would need this type of player to create not only the assists, but also provide the pass before the assist, he can create spaces with his pass and is clever.

I would take him for 20M with no hesitation

No doubt. Especially with the septic display from Mkh lately.
 
Press Gossip thread has the Daily Star saying Mourinho and Ozil talk regularly about his move to Manchester United next summer. I don't think either want a massive transfer squabble in January. I think both would prefer a settle in period between the WC and the start EPL season.
 
4-3-3

Ozil would set us on the wrong track. As great as he is, I want another midfielder who can step in when Pogba is injured and augment him when he isn't.
 
We should be in for BOTH Ozil and Sanchez tbh,especially if reports are to be believed that Barcelona will be making a move for Griezmann next year!
 
Keep hearing about this from odd sources. NBCSN mentioned it today as if it was likely in the near term.
 
I hope we sign him.

Aside from a couple of great moments, Mkhitaryan really hasn't done enough for my liking. Ozil is class and he is a "Mourinho man"
 
Would be nice to get him in January as I can't take another half season of Mkhi fecking about at #10.

In summer I think we can do better though, but I wouldn't be against going for him anyways since he will be a freebie, and we'll likely need two new playmakers since honestly we should upgrade both the ones we've got.
 
If he can keep producing those through passes, the forwards like Rom and Rashford would have a field day. At the moment, Miki is not playing like the AM or no. 10 for this United team. He performed better when playing on the right than the center.
 
The Mkhi giving his all is more against him than helping. I meant if these past games were supposed to Mkhi giving his all then Lingard has been outperforming him just by mere effort. The contrast of Lingard being subbed on vs L'pool and this Tottenham game and Mkhi's effort is astonishing. As I put it in my previous post in response to other poster trying downplay Lingard today, Mkhi ghosted most of his minutes on the pitch and we played almost like a man down, while Lingard introduction actually gave us a balance in midfield battle and that connection between the forwards with the rest of the team

As I put it, no 10 role in counter attack play is to be present to help the forward. Failed to do just that despite not providing the workrate of Lingard's short quality, then that no 10 is worthless.

I meant in my previous post that I wouldn't expect Madrid Ozil all the time, but even his worst is not that useless aka not crap bottom level as it is exegerated by unrealistic expectation.

I agree that Ozil would be short term planning, but realistically it is needed to gain every possible edge. We're to fix the long term failure in immediate finding competent coach to succeed SAF. While we might have undone the damage, we are still building up to get back to that level. You need short term flexibilities for this type of situation.
I moved this to the Ozil thread as we were clogging up Mkhi's. :D

I can't disagree with most of that. Though I do see what you mean about Mkhi giving his all being more against him than for, I prefer it to Ozil's lazy showings as it gets on my nerves now despite not even liking Arsenal. He's no so much giving his all in terms of showcasing his full talent; he's just working hard for the team, which, even though I agree isn't enough from a #10, shows he at least cares.

Still, I agree with most of what you say. I'm not too keen on the player but I can see why a lot of fans are in favour of signing him and if José wants him then we'll have to trust his judgement. It's working so far with Matic.
 
I moved this to the Ozil thread as we were clogging up Mkhi's. :D

I can't disagree with most of that. Though I do see what you mean about Mkhi giving his all being more against him than for, I prefer it to Ozil's lazy showings as it gets on my nerves now despite not even liking Arsenal. He's no so much giving his all in terms of showcasing his full talent; he's just working hard for the team, which, even though I agree isn't enough from a #10, shows he at least cares.

Still, I agree with most of what you say. I'm not too keen on the player but I can see why a lot of fans are in favour of signing him and if José wants him then we'll have to trust his judgement. It's working so far with Matic.

Signing Ozil isn't excluding any other acquisition at #10\playmaker role. We need to upgrade both our options there in Mata and Mkhi, neither of them are good enough for where we want to be.

Getting Ozil on a free when we are likely to spend something like 100m euros on Griezmann would be good business. Both will be significant upgrades on what we currently have.
 
Mkhitaryan was bought as a winger (judging by his early games) and only moved to #10 after failing to impose himself out-wide. The best players in the squad are all suited to playing 4-3-3 but are only being fielded in a 4-2-3-1 because Jose seems to like having Mkhitaryan's incisiveness somewhere in the lineup.

If we going to replace Mkhitaryan, I'd rather it were with a similarly incisive midfielder rather than another #10 like Ozil. Pogba, Rashford and Martial would all have a lot more freedom to get into central attacking areas - which is exactly what's been holding them back from going to the next level.

As much as I like Ozil, I'll be disappointed if we go down that route. He'd be an upgrade within an imperfect system rather than a solution to the underlying issues with our personnel.
 
Signing Ozil isn't excluding any other acquisition at #10\playmaker role. We need to upgrade both our options there in Mata and Mkhi, neither of them are good enough for where we want to be.
We do need an upgrade on Mata and Mkhi and whilst signing Ozil doesn't necessarily mean we won't sign another attacker, it does make it less likely. Still, Ozil (if he performs like José thinks he can) alone could help boost the team.
Getting Ozil on a free when we are likely to spend something like 100m euros on Griezmann would be good business. Both will be significant upgrades on what we currently have.
It's definitely worth a shot but I'm not the biggest fan of either player. They are indeed an upgrade on both Mata and Mkhi so I won't complain if that's the route José chooses to go down, though.
 
4-3-3

Ozil would set us on the wrong track. As great as he is, I want another midfielder who can step in when Pogba is injured and augment him when he isn't.
That's pretty much where I stand. Someone like Carlos Soler to carry the ball forward, and someone like Malcom for RF, a bit of dash and skill, and I'd be sorted.
 

Somehow ozil's stats stay so high, i still think he would be a great improvement on mkhi without breaking the bank.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.